Skip to main content

Locking down the legalities when planning ahead

The Law Society says that many firms have reported a 30% increase due to worries about the Coronavirus pandemic. However, the lockdown and self-isolation create new challenges in getting new wills drafted and signed while complying with legal requirements.

There has also been a surge in people looking to set up powers of attorney to enable others to act on their behalf in managing their financial, property and other affairs should they lose capacity. However, this is also proving a challenge during the current crisis.

Private client partner, James McMullan, says:

“It’s important to get it right when dealing with vital documents involving your assets. There are issues around demonstrating that someone has the ability to make such decisions if they are older or unwell, as it is likely to be difficult to get a doctor to verify their capacity with the current pressure on the NHS, which may be needed if new wills or powers of attorney are to stand up in court.

In such situations, the ideal is to sit down with the person face to face to get a sense of how they articulate their choices and to be sure the outcomes are what they really want, whether deciding who will inherit through their will, or appointing attorneys to manage their affairs.”

In today’s climate, such discussions are more likely to be by telephone, email or possibly video conferencing, particularly where someone is ill. Still, if an independent professional is involved, there is a greater chance that new wills and powers of attorney will later stand. They will check if you are leaving yourself open to claims on your estate by excluding anyone and advise on the appointment of attorneys to be sure they are fit for the task and understand their responsibilities and how they will be held accountable.

A professional can also help to ensure that new wills and powers of attorney are legally binding, as the actual signing and witnessing of a will remains an exception to the recent shift towards accepting electronic signatures on contracts and many deeds in England and Wales.

While live video witnessing in such situations is under discussion, the current rule is that anyone making a new will must sign in the presence of two witnesses, who must, in turn, sign in the presence of the person making the will. Physical presence is essential but presents a real challenge given the present regulations requiring social distancing, particularly as anyone who is a beneficiary will lose their gift under a will if they witness it. It means that immediate family members, who are most likely to be available, cannot be a witness if they stand to inherit anything.

Even witnessing from the next room or through a window might be challenged as not being formally in the presence of the person making the will, although in a case that went to court almost 250 years ago, it was agreed to be sufficient to have two witnesses who are in the line of sight even though they were not in the same room (Casson v Dade 1781)

Why make a will?

Research shows that half of all adults in the UK do not have a will in place, with the figure rising to almost 60% among parents.

Many avoid making a will because they imagine their assets will go automatically to their partner or their family will be left to decide how to distribute it. But without a will, the intestacy rules come into play, which govern how a person’s estate is distributed if they die ‘intestate’.

The rules have a strict order of distribution and do not provide for any cohabiting partner, irrespective of the length of the relationship. They also allow children under 18 to receive assets without controlling how the money is spent.

Having a will setting out what you wish to happen if you die before your children are 18 is the only legal way to be sure they will be provided for and brought up in the way you wish, with the guardians you choose.

If you drew up your will before getting married, it is automatically invalidated on marriage unless it was drafted in expectation of the ceremony. And if you are getting divorced, any existing will remains valid until the decree absolute is confirmed, even if you have separated or received your decree nisi, meaning the spouse you are divorcing would benefit if those are the terms of your existing will.

Equally, if you do not have a will and something were to happen to you before the divorce is completed, then the intestacy rules would apply and, again, it would be the spouse you are divorcing who would benefit, not your children or a new partner, parents or siblings. This may be the outcome you wish to happen, but if not, the only way to ensure that your wishes are carried out is to make a new will to cover your current situation, and this can be done at any stage of the separation and divorce process.

Call private client partner James McMullan today.

Note: This is not legal advice; it provides information of general interest about current legal issues.


Lockdown family breakdown toolkit

For couples who are struggling in their relationship or as co-parents, anxiety levels are likely to be heightened during lockdown. Meanwhile, it seems there is nowhere to turn, with personal movements restricted and the family courts working remotely and on limited schedules.

Being a family lawyer means being there for all the challenges, not just the day in court. It is more important than ever that family lawyers are available to advise, encourage and support their clients. At RIAA Barker Gillette, we use the latest technology to host face-to-face meetings with our clients, keep the doors open, and support families through this crisis.

In China, which was first into lockdown following the discovery of the virus, there have been reports of a huge surge in divorce petitions as couples emerge from the country’s stringent restrictions, with one city official in Hunan province quoted as saying that what may have seemed trivial in normal life had escalated for many couples struggling to deal with these exceptional circumstances.

For those in the UK who were considering or had already started divorce proceedings, many will still be living together, adding to the pressures of lockdown. For those struggling under the relentless strain of being in each other’s company 24/7, it will be hard to find a way to release the pressure to see clearly whether the relationship has run its course, such as through couples counselling or simply taking a break from each other.

While no-fault divorce is likely to become law once the legislation resumes its progress through Parliament, for now, couples must continue to deal with one party being ‘blamed’ for the breakup or wait for the change in the law.

Under the existing Matrimonial Causes Act 1973, one party must prove that their partner is at fault through either adultery or unreasonable behaviour. Alternatively, and only if both sides agree, they can part after two years of separation. If no fault is given, and one party does not consent to the divorce, then the period of separation is extended to living apart for five years.

For those who feel compelled to act now or as soon as we come out of lockdown, it is likely that we will see unreasonable behaviour cited as the most common ground for such divorces. The most recent ONS statistics (for opposite-sex couples) show 36.8% of all husbands and 51.9% of all wives petitioning for divorce on this ground.

But petitioning is only the start of what may be a long journey, with the process of divorce, negotiating over finances and family arrangements, becoming ever more complex. That is partly because there is more at stake, particularly for middle-aged couples when couples hammer out a fair division after a marriage breakdown. ONS wealth statistics show that by 2014, half of all households had a total wealth of £225,100 or more.

The Children and Families Act 2014 requires a couple who are separating to consider using mediation or other alternative dispute resolution options before they can ask a court to resolve their dispute, so it’s best to approach things with an open attitude. We always encourage couples, where safe, to talk and to try and come to an agreement. This has become even more important in the current situation.

Toolkit: Things to think about, depending on where you are

Deciding whether your relationship has run its course

If you’re going through a bad patch, you may have decided to try and reconcile your differences or else wait until the lockdown ends. Assuming there are no personal safety issues, the decision will likely be dictated by financial circumstances. Funding two homes is daunting when job security is under threat and investments have crashed, and that’s before considering how to identify and move into alternative accommodation under lockdown.

If the result is that you are going to try and live apart while still in the same house, in anticipation of separation later, it’s worth approaching it in a structured way and tackling the bigger issues, such as agreeing on who gets which rooms or areas, how you will share the household expenses and how you will present the situation to any children living with you.

It is a good idea to put such arrangements in writing. You can do this yourself or with the help of a mediator or one of our family lawyers. Involving them early can help avoid the obvious pitfalls while giving you some moral support. Such assistance becomes vital when deciding to start divorce proceedings when legal and financial advice is important from the very beginning.

Regarding administration, the courts have confirmed that online applications will continue, with the divorce petition processed from application through to decree absolute without any need for face-to-face contact.

Similarly, applications for orders relating to children can be made urgently or online (in certain postcodes).

Progressing divorce

The current financial uncertainty is making decision-making difficult. Any financial arrangements made in usual circumstances will have a degree of flex built in, but we are in extraordinary times where both assets and job security will be uncertain.

The starting point for any settlement is to look at assets in the marriage, with shared financial information for bank accounts, investments and other assets. For those who are part of the way through the process, such figures may have been collected some time ago and already form the basis for a settlement figure. The impact of the Coronavirus on all aspects of the economy, the stock market and the likely downturn in the property market make it essential that these are reviewed in the context of any settlement negotiations.

If a court date has already been set, the hearing may be moved and will be held remotely. Where cases are complex, the courts are expected to use video links for hearings, although in-person hearings may still be held subject to individual circumstances and the demands of the case.

It is usual in any divorce settlement to balance risk with absolute value, and we work to ensure no individual ends up with all the riskier or illiquid assets. Still, some may have already reached a settlement that no longer seems fair. It is important to seek legal advice and guidance as soon as possible, as the speed of action is one of the factors considered by the courts. There is no guarantee that orders may be amended, even in the current circumstances. The capital elements of any settlement will be amended only where an unforeseen event invalidates the assumption on which the order was based, and following the 2008 market crash, the Court of Appeal ruled the financial disruption was not an unforeseen event.

Maintenance arrangements

Unlike the capital element, if you earn less money during the crisis or have lost your job, it may be possible to ask the court for a payment variation under a maintenance order. Going back to court can be costly; the best starting point would be to see if you can reach an agreement yourself while exploring other sources of income and benefits.

It’s worth appreciating that a fall in income may not justify a change in arrangements, as maintenance is needs-based, and the needs of both parties and any dependent children will be evaluated.

Suppose you are the one receiving maintenance payments, and you lose other sources of income during the current crisis, such as your job. In that case, you can ask for a variation due to changed circumstances. Still, the court will first expect you to take reasonable steps to secure other sources of income, such as applying for relevant Government Coronavirus schemes. If it’s likely to be just a temporary situation, then try to have a conversation and put everything in writing.

Whether you are paying or receiving, take legal advice and avoid getting into a situation where you breach a court order without trying to resolve the problem.

Co-parenting

Where parents live in different households, the Government has clarified the advice on how to approach co-parenting.

Children under 18 whose parents are living apart can move between the homes of their parents, in an exception to the mandatory stay-at-home rule for us all. But this does not mean children should move around without weighing up what is best – such as the health of all concerned, the risk of infection and how and where any handover occurs. If one parent is a key worker, then it may be sensible for the other parent to look after the children to reduce infection risks.

If, for any reason, a child will not spend their scheduled time with one parent, the courts expect regular contact to be maintained through other means, such as FaceTime or Skype.

Importantly, any variation to current arrangements should be agreed between you and put in writing wherever possible. The guidance says that:

“…the court is likely to look to see whether each parent acted reasonably and sensibly in the light of the official advice and the stay-at-home rules in place at that time, together with any specific evidence relating to the child or family.”

Where there is a disagreement on arrangements, seek legal advice. Whether for enforcement or applying for a change to the contact arrangements, court hearings continue, although the default is via phone or video link.

The most important thing for children is that parents avoid conflict. Movie stars Bruce Willis and Demi Moore may have divorced 20 years ago, but they are exemplary co-parents – even sharing lockdown time together with their adult children in California.

In her recent autobiography, Moore wrote that it wasn’t easy at first, “but we managed to move the heart of our relationship, the heart of what created our family, into something new that gave the girls a loving, supportive environment with both parents. We felt more connected than we did before the divorce.”

That’s a great position to be in. Still, for those who struggle to emulate such an example while going through a relationship breakdown, it’s important that you do all you can to avoid heated disputes and keep arguments away from any children.

For more information, read our article “Co-parenting during COVID-19”.

Domestic abuse

China experienced a surge in reported domestic abuse during the lockdown, a factor, unfortunately, being replicated in the UK according to early reports, so while it may be a hard call to make, in the current situation, it’s more important than ever that you seek legal advice and/or contact the police if abuse is taking place.

For those without physical risk, acting if you need help is still important. Reaching out to a family lawyer and receiving impartial support may be enough to keep things on a more even keel during a lockdown.

If things have gone too far to be resolved, then receiving legal advice on what is feasible and how to approach conflict could make all the difference. If you are in lockdown with your partner, you may not be able to speak on the phone or video conference, but having an email exchange with a lawyer can bridge the gap. Our family lawyers are making themselves available in whatever way they can to help with the current crisis.

Contact family solicitor Pippa Marshall today for more information.

Note: This is not legal advice; it provides information of general interest about current legal issues.


Suspension of rent because of a lockdown

The most common question has been, “Do I have to carry on paying my rent?” or conversely “Must my tenant still pay the rent?” Typically, the answer is yes. The rent is still payable, as nobody in the real estate world foresaw the lockdown.

Such has been its severity that lawyers will be expected to address the possibility of repetition in future lease negotiations.

For many years it has been customary in leases to stipulate that rent will be suspended and not payable if the property is damaged by fire or another insured risk. Note that a precursor to the usual relief application is physical damage or destruction of the bricks and mortar, and the virus has not caused such damage.

Tenants will likely try to negotiate the inclusion of wording which extends the suspension of rent to the period of any lockdown resulting from a future pandemic or similar event. Landlords may or may not resist successfully. The leap in mindset has already been done in respect of what lawyers commonly call ‘uninsured risks’, but this has been relatively easy to concede because of the rarity of its application. Fears regarding the virus have spilt over into fear of a second pandemic once the current one is over. It is likely to be regarded as a clear and present risk.

Landlords may look to offset the risk against insurance cover, as they do with a loss of rent insurance in case of damage by fire (mostly paid for by tenants).

Doubtless, insurers are already reflecting on new products and extensions to business interruption policies due to the pandemic. Press stories on the reliability of claims on such policies for the current virus leave one with the impression that the endeavours of the insurance industry may continue to exploit the fine line which sells policies but does not necessarily pay out on them.

Insurers have to make profits, and the hard truth may be that the effect of the pandemic is so huge that its widest effects are uninsurable. It falls to the government to be an insurer of last resort (a role that it undertook as a reaction and not by design regarding COVID-19). It may not be beyond the limits of the insurance industry to develop a loss of rent policy for the real estate world, which complements a clause for suspension of rent in case of a pandemic lockdown. Time will tell.

What will become normal practice, in respect of the sharing or bearing of risk between landlord and tenants for rent payment for properties that are not useable because of the pandemic lockdown, is uncertain. It will surely be the subject of active discussion in future lease negotiations.

Call John Gillette today if you have a question about the terms of your lease of commercial premises or any future lease.

Note: This is not legal advice; it provides information of general interest about current legal issues.


Make your will the top of your list

This global pandemic may be a major life event for everyone and something we will discuss in years to come. It may change our approach to many aspects of our lives.

The Law Society has reported that many people have used this time to create or update their wills. However, many people in the UK still do not have a will, and with most hospital visitation rights being suspended, should you fall fatally ill, a last-minute will may not be possible.

If you do not have a will, your estate (all the assets you own at the date of your death) are distributed in accordance with the Intestacy Rules. Here you can find a useful flow chart to see where your assets will go under the Intestacy Rules.

If the Intestacy Rules do not distribute your assets as you would like, you must create a will. This will give both you and your loved ones peace of mind. Losing a loved one can be difficult enough. A will helps provide your loved ones with security and assurance that they will be supported even after you are gone.

Beyond distributing your assets, you can appoint guardians for your children or even create a trust fund for minor children or a disabled member of your family to ensure they receive the support they need after you have gone – this can even include your pets! We can ensure that your will is tax-efficient, using all available reliefs and allowances from inheritance tax.

Call private client partner James McMullan today.

Note: This is not legal advice; it provides information of general interest about current legal issues.


Relying on legal advice can provide a defence

In the recent Court of Appeal case David Allen t/a David Allen Chartered Accountants v Dodd & Co Limited, Dodd & Co escaped liability for inducing a breach of contract because they had sought legal advice on their intentions before acting which provided them with a defence. They successfully demonstrated that they had honestly relied upon the legal advice they were given, even though that advice was incorrect.

Facts

Mr Pollock worked at David Allen Chartered Accountants (David Allen). His employment contract contained non-compete and non-solicitation clauses, commonly known as post-termination restrictions or restrictive covenants. Dodd & Co wished to employ Mr Pollock and were aware of his restrictive covenants. Before employing him, Dodd & Co sought legal advice on the enforceability of Mr Pollock’s restrictive covenants and were advised:

“…the restrictive covenant hasn’t got a lot going for it. You could, therefore, act and allow [Mr Pollock] to act on the basis that it isn’t enforceable and contact David Allen’s clients. This is almost certain to provoke a strong reaction. He will probably write to [Mr Pollock] setting out why he believes [Mr Pollock] is in breach…”

As a result of that advice, Dodd & Co employed Mr Pollock, as whilst not entirely without risk, it was more likely than not that the restrictive covenants were unenforceable. In fact, the court held that the covenants were enforceable, and by working for Dodd & Co, Mr Pollock was in breach. Nonetheless, the court rejected the claim against Dodd & Co, brought by David Allen, for inducing the breach by Mr Pollock on the basis that they had relied honestly on the legal advice they had obtained.

The Court of Appeal’s decision

The decision was subject to appeal, and the Court of Appeal upheld the High Court’s decision. It found that Dodd & Co were not ignorant of Mr Pollock’s contractual obligations and had gone to the trouble of obtaining legal advice before offering him employment. The fact that the legal advice turned out to be wrong was not enough for David Allen to be successful in his claim against Dodd & Co. During the appeal, David Allen argued that there should be liability whenever a defendant believes there is a risk that its conduct, in this case employing Mr Pollock, would cause a breach. The court rejected the argument:

“As everyone knows, lawyers rarely give unequivocal advice; and even if they do the client must appreciate that there is always a risk …that the advice will turn out to be wrong.”

Although this case focuses on restrictive covenants in an employment setting, it is important to remember that the tort of inducing a breach of contract applies to all manner of contracts, and it is best practice to seek legal advice early on. Where a party honestly relies on such advice, it may prove to be a defence to the tort of inducing a breach of contract.

The courts accept that a solicitor’s advice is rarely definitive and will inherently attach an element of risk. Generally, the party seeking that advice must weigh up any risks identified within the advice before acting upon it – even if, in some circumstances, it may still provide a suitable defence.

The message is clear; always consult a solicitor before acting!

Call Karen Cole today for advice and information.

Note: This is not legal advice; it provides information of general interest about current legal issues.


Lockdown your data whilst remote working

Staff are likely to be working remotely or in different circumstances, which could make customer and client details more vulnerable to data breaches, and cyber-criminals are ratcheting up their fraudulent scams. It is also worth bearing in mind that data relating to employee health will likely increase given the pandemic, and extra security measures must be given to this special category of personal data.

Businesses are implementing contingency planning, with staff working from home and using domestic internet and possibly personal devices to access cloud-based software and systems, making keeping data safe and secure more important than ever, as fines for data breaches will still apply.

Whilst it’s not quite “Stop all the clocks, cut off the telephone”, the Data Protection Act 2018 (DPA) does provide strict operating boundaries for businesses processing personally identifiable information about individuals with a statutory obligation to notify the regulator of any breach which places an individual’s personally identifiable information at risk. It also gives wide-ranging power to the UK’s data regulator, the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO), which can impose high penalties for breaches.

Karen Cole, our Deputy Data Protection Leader and Employment Partner, explains:

“Tackling the threat of the Coronavirus is taking businesses into unchartered territory, and while data protection law doesn’t stand in the way of homeworking, or the use of personal devices, it demands even greater attention to security measures, as the ones that you use in the office will need to be tailored to suit these new circumstances.

The human element is often the reason for data breaches and without direct supervision and colleagues to consult, these may be more likely to happen. Certainly, there are reports of a steep rise in attempted cyber fraud, with many more phishing emails, malware and social engineering, where fraudsters dupe staff into revealing information or making money transfers.”

The other major threat to data security during the crisis is handling individual information about staff and visitors who have travelled to high-risk areas, symptoms, test results and when self-isolation has taken place. This is personal data protected by the DPA, but where it concerns health, it may be special category data under the DPA, which requires special security measures.

Such information should be collected and used only as absolutely necessary in managing risk and should not be retained unless essential, such as for an insurance claim.

Karen added:

“Ideally the management and sharing of information is set out in a policy so you know who to tell and what information is shared with whom. So, for example, the ICO has said that it is ok to inform other staff if someone tests positive, or is suspected of having contracted the virus, so as to protect the health and safety of all, but to avoid naming those individuals.

Organisations will be struggling to keep pace in this fast-changing environment, it’s important to make sure you don’t drop the ball when it comes to personal data. If you end up with a breach and compromised data when you come out the other end it will be a serious issue. The ICO has the power to impose fines of up to €20m or 4% of total worldwide turnover and the damage to corporate reputation can be immense.”

While the ICO say they will be pragmatic about matters such as speed of response to information requests during the crisis, there is no suggestion that they will accept reduced data security standards.

Give yourself peace of mind. Call Karen Cole today.

Note: This is not legal advice; it provides information of general interest about current legal issues.


Co-parenting during COVID-19

Our family lawyers are seeing an increase in cases where COVID-19 is used as an illegitimate excuse to defy child arrangements orders or alter previously agreed routines. Whilst additional thought must be given to ensure that both children and parents remain safe, that should not be at the expense of quality time with each parent.

We urge all separated parents to read the helpful Cafcass guidance “Co-parenting and child arrangements in a global pandemic – advice for families” and seize upon these difficult times as a positive opportunity to improve communication with your co-parent.

Home-schooling parents should use this time to understand their children’s educational development and safely harness the advantages of sharing quality family time together. Technology can also greatly assist children with their schooling needs, exercise classes and staying in touch with friends and family. Indeed, social media sites have seen an influx of families coming together to make videos and “shorts” to entertain us all.

Thankfully, in the last two weeks, our lawyers have also seen many cases where these unprecedented times, coupled with the right guidance, have persuaded parents to set aside their differences and really prioritise their children’s needs. We can only hope parents will continue with the same spirit once we’ve overcome the Coronavirus pandemic.

Pippa Marshall is a Resolution member. Resolution is a community of family justice professionals who work with families and individuals to resolve their issues in a considered and constructive way.

If you’re struggling to maintain the status quo, our family team can help and assist you with any disputes over children. Call Pippa today.

Note: This is not legal advice; it provides information of general interest about current legal issues.


Don’t put your footer in it when it comes to contracts

Although legislation to align e-signature standards across the EU was introduced by the Electronic Identification Regulation in 2016 and the Electronic Communications Act 2000, there remains confusion.

Head of Corporate and Commercial Victoria Holland explains:

“As a general rule, no contract made under English law needs to be signed, or even be in writing, unless the contract is a guarantee for payment by someone else, or it relates to land or is made by deed. People often think they must sign on the dotted line to seal a deal but in many situations all that is needed is a clear agreement and intention.

With the increased use of electronic communications in contractual negotiations, it is important for companies to understand all the different circumstances in which an exchange may form a binding contract.”

Last year, the Law Commission published a report on the electronic execution of documents to tackle this uncertainty. The Law Commission confirmed that e-signatures could be used to execute documents as an alternative to wet ink signatures in most circumstances and relied upon as evidence.

The recent case of Neocleous v Rees signals a further shift in the approach to e-signatures with implications for anyone involved in electronic, contractual negotiations.

The court ruled that including the writer’s name in the automatic email footer amounted to an electronic signature and was sufficient to conclude a binding contract for transferring an interest in land.

The judge said that the email sender knew that his name would be added as a footer and, although it was an automatic process, it represented a conscious decision, combined with the name and contact details being in the conventional style of a signature, at the end of the document.

Head of Dispute Resolution, M. Qaiser Khanzada, explains:

“This case related to a fairly rare type of property transaction but has an important message for day-to-day communications. If companies are to avoid inadvertently entering into a contract with suppliers or customers, they should incorporate a clear disclaimer designed to prevent the accidental formation of a contract and not simply rely on an automatic proviso to their e-signatures.”

It follows that, as well as email footers, other methods that could create a valid signature include:

  • secure passwords
  • tick-boxes
  • PIN numbers

Ink signatures are still required for the execution of deeds, as the signature must be witnessed, and the law does not presently allow for remote witnessing. However, live video witnessing is under discussion.

For contract enquiries, speak to Victoria Holland today. For contract disputes, call M. Qaiser Khanzada today.

Note: This is not legal advice; it provides information of general interest about current legal issues.


Trial periods in a redundancy scenario

It is advisable, in any redundancy consultation, for an employer to make a reasonable search for suitable alternative employment, which employees at risk of redundancy could perform to avoid being made redundant.

Where alternative employment is offered, both the employer and the employee benefit from a trial period to assess the suitability of that role. Under the Employment Rights Act, the trial period starts when the employee’s employment under their existing contract ends and lasts for a period of four weeks.

In the recent case of East London NHS Foundation Trust v Mr David O’Connor, Mr O’Connor worked for the NHS. In 2017 he was made aware that he was at risk of redundancy. He was told that due to a reorganisation, his current role would be “deleted” on 3 July 2017 and he began a trial for a different role on that date.

The parties subsequently disagreed about whether this role was suitable and Mr O’Connor pursued a grievance which was unsuccessful. The NHS again offered Mr O’Connor the alternative role which he declined, and he was therefore dismissed in December 2017.

In dismissing Mr O’Connor, the NHS refused to make a redundancy payment to him, as it argued that the trial period had ended on 9 August 2017.

One of the first issues the Employment Tribunal had to consider was whether Mr O’Connor had been dismissed on 3 July 2017, prior to starting the trial of his new role. They concluded that he had not and, therefore, 3 July was not the start date of his trial period.

In a scenario such as this, legislation provides that an employee shall be taken to be dismissed by his employer if, amongst other things, the employer gives notice to the employee to terminate his existing contract of employment.

Whilst the NHS had informed Mr O’Connor that he was at risk of redundancy and made him aware that his role was being “deleted”, it did not, in law, constitute a notice of dismissal.

An employer must communicate to an employee that their employment is terminating and whilst Mr O’Connor knew that his then role was being “deleted”, the Employment Tribunal held that it was ambiguous as to whether Mr O’Connor would consequently know that his employment contract was being terminated.

Employers need to have a sound working knowledge of the redundancy process and the recommended practices surrounding it, so as not to fall foul of procedure. Employers that do not carry out a full and fair redundancy process could face claims for unfair dismissal.

For advice and information on any redundancy process, Karen Cole today.

Note: This is not legal advice; it provides information of general interest about current legal issues.


Human rights, employment and social media

In the case of Herbai v Hungary, an HR manager, Mr Herbai, was dismissed following his two blog posts on HR strategy and tax rates. In his blog, Mr Herbai described himself as an HR expert in management at a large bank. When this came to his employer’s attention, he was dismissed on the grounds that his conduct had damaged the bank’s economic interests and breached its confidentiality standards.

The Hungarian Supreme Court upheld the bank’s decision to dismiss Mr Herbai on the grounds that his conduct had endangered the bank’s business interests.

Mr Herbai appealed the decision because the termination of his employment had breached his freedom of expression rights under Article 10 of the Human Rights Act.

Article 10 confirms an individual’s right to freedom of expression and information, subject to certain restrictions that are “in accordance with law” and “necessary in a democratic society”. This right includes the freedom to hold opinions and to receive and impart information and ideas.

The court considered four elements relevant to the restriction of free speech in the context of an employment relationship:

  1. The nature of the speech
    The court rejected the bank’s argument that Article 10 did not apply as the published comments were addressed to HR professionals rather than the public.
  2. The motives of the author
    The motive was simply to share knowledge with a professional readership.
  3. The damage caused by the speech to the employer
    The bank made no attempt to demonstrate how the speech could have adversely affected its interests.
  4. The severity of the sanction imposed.
    Clearly, Mr Herbai had suffered a severe penalty, as he had been dismissed without any lesser sanction being considered.

The European Court of Human Rights found that the Hungarian courts had failed to balance an individual’s right to freedom of expression and an employer’s right to protect its legitimate business interests. They, therefore, did not discharge their positive obligations under Article 10.

Employers need to be vigilant so as not to violate employees’ rights in relation to freedom of expression. It is always advisable to take legal advice before dismissing an employee.

If you have a query about the dismissal of an employee or any other employment enquiries, call Karen Cole today.

Note: This is not legal advice; it provides information of general interest about current legal issues.


Stay in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter

Stay in touch

By completing your details and submitting this form you confirm you are happy for us to send you marketing communications and that you agree to our Website Privacy Policy and Legal Notice and to us using Mailchimp to process your data.


Sending

News/Insight

  • Deal or no deal? Keeping negotiations on track
    How to keep commercial deals on track with Heads of Terms, NDAs and exclusivity, improving efficiency, reducing risk and avoiding delays.


    Read more
  • Rights and wrongs: How AI is reshaping Employment Tribunal claims
    AI may be a familiar presence in the workplace, but it’s now starting to appear somewhere less expected: the Employment Tribunal (ET). Grayson Stuckey explores this trend – and what it means for employers.


    Read more
  • Renters’ Rights Act: why process and paperwork matter more than ever for landlords
    The Renters’ Rights Act has now passed into law, marking one of the most significant shifts in the private rented sector in a generation. Most of the new measures will take effect in May 2026, with a national landlord database to follow later in th


    Read more
  • Understanding the Roles of Executors and Trustees
    When making a will, you place significant trust in those appointed to carry out your wishes. Executors and trustees are key roles, often held by the same people, but their responsibilities differ. Understanding these roles and their obligations helps


    Read more
  • Assigning or Subletting a Commercial Lease: What Tenants Need to Know
    This article explains the key differences between assignment and subletting, outlines the legal framework in England and Wales, and highlights the practical issues tenants should consider before taking action.


    Read more

What they say...

  • Paul Woodman, March 2026
    Will writing “Excellent service from start to finish. Efficient and good value. Charlotte was very professional, knowledgeable and understanding.”

  • Client, March 2026
    Great Service “Contacted RIAA to update my will and other things. Charlotte and James provided an efficient, friendly service, and the process was dealt with quickly. Much appreciated.”

  • Client, March 2026
    Expert knowledge and support “Pippa was invaluable in her insight, knowledge, and support. Through what is a very difficult time, she gave me hope that there is something to be done. Very solutions-oriented!”

  • Eve, March 2026
    Professional, compassionate and seamless legal support “I would like to express my sincere gratitude to Charlotte, Solicitor at RIAA Barker Gillette (UK) LLP, for the outstanding support she provided to my father during the creation of his will

  • Laura Kelly, February 2026
    Review of legal guidance received “I recently worked with Patrick Simpson on my settlement agreement. Patrick guided me through every stage with exceptional care and diligence. He kept the process moving efficiently, always updating me promptly

Read more