Skip to main content

News story

June 26, 2017

Time to get excited: Energy Performance Certificates (EPCs)

Time to get excited?

“Can I see your EPC?” said the Actress to the Bishop.”Only if I can see yours first!” came the reply.

Excitement or energy performance levels might have a place in their relationship but they may have to content themselves with exchanging certificates regarding their buildings. An Energy Performance Certificate (EPC) is a measure of the energy efficiency of a building or part of it, often a dwelling or commercial space.

An EPC is intended to influence the decision made by a prospective tenant or buyer. The performance rating is from a green ‘A’ to a red ‘G’. The better the rating, the less the electricity and gas bills for heating the relevant building. More importantly, a good rating means the building is less likely to pollute the air we breathe.

This second factor is hugely important. London and our other major cities are polluted. Our buildings are a major contributor to that pollution, coming second only to vehicles. However, vehicles are raising their game as a result of the increasing move to electric powered cars, taxis and buses. Everybody who lives or works in the city should be energised to look at a building’s EPC more critically and to consider what can be done to improve it.

Energy Performance Certificates are seen as a box-ticking item. The law (courtesy of European Union Directives) requires one to be obtained before a building is marketed for sale or letting. They are passed along from one professional adviser to another and are dutifully supplied to buyers and tenants but I have not come across a case in which an EPC has influenced a letting or buying decision.

The law is being used to raise the ante. Property owners are now under more legislative pressure to make their buildings energy efficient.

Under the Minimum Energy Efficiency Standards Regulations (‘MEES Regulations’)*, it will in many cases be unlawful to grant a new tenancy, which does not have minimum energy efficiency standards. At the moment this equates to an EPC rating better than an ‘F’ or ‘G’ rating. So, if the EPC rating for the relevant building is F or G it may be unlawful to let it.

Currently, the MEES Regulations are targeted at private sector landlords and do not impact on sellers. Enforcement is to be in the hands of local authorities and trading standards officers.

There are many exceptions and if you have a building which is inherently energy inefficient you may be exempt or able to seek an exemption.

The letting landscape for energy inefficient space is getting increasingly complicated. Indifference to an ‘F’ or ‘G’ rating is no longer an option. We should all be motivated to make our cities less polluted and healthier places in which to live and work. EPCs are a good thing. Let’s take note and get excited by them.

Speak to head of residential property today for more information on EPCs.

*Energy Efficiency (private rented property) (England and Wales) regulations 2015 (SI 2015/962)

Note: This is not legal advice; it provides information of general interest about current legal issues.

Stay in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter

Stay in touch

By completing your details and submitting this form you confirm you are happy for us to send you marketing communications and that you agree to our Website Privacy Policy and Legal Notice and to us using Mailchimp to process your data.


Sending

News/Insight

  • Converting commercial property into homes: what the latest planning changes mean
    Converting offices and other commercial buildings into homes can create opportunities, but planning rules are only part of the picture. We explain the latest changes and the legal issues property owners, developers and buyers should consider before p


    Read more
  • Closing the AI skills gap
    Learn how SMEs can close the AI skills gap through practical staff training, checking AI outputs, protecting sensitive data and setting clear policies.


    Read more
  • What’s in a letter: Why one small change can spell big trouble for your brand
    Can changing one letter really protect your business name? Peter Moody examines recent trade mark disputes involving FLOWERBX and Vogue, and what businesses can learn about protecting their brands.


    Read more
  • Service charge disputes in mixed-use properties: who is responsible for what?
    Service charges in mixed-use properties can lead to disagreements between landlords, residential leaseholders and commercial tenants. We explore their legal rights, a recent Court of Appeal decision and how disputes can be resolved.


    Read more
  • The do’s and don’ts of using AI in your business
    AI can help businesses improve efficiency and make informed decisions, but it also comes with risks. Explore the key do’s and don’ts of using AI responsibly, including data protection, legal considerations and the importance of human oversight.


    Read more

What they say...

  • Rahul Khanna, October 2026
    Thank you – excellent service “Thank you so much to Qaiser, Vinay and Alex, who were extremely helpful throughout a long-running and complex matter. I really appreciated their clear advice and support.”

  • Client, October 2026
    Feedback “I engaged Karen Cole at RIAA Barker Gillette to support me through a grievance process and help me navigate discussions with my employer. From the outset, Karen provided clear, pragmatic advice and took the time to explain my options,

  • Bryan E, September 2026
    Absolutely outstanding “This firm is super professional, efficient and friendly at the same time. You could not wish for a better service. I have used them for my Will and a range of other matters over many years. I’ve found all the vario

  • Jan Norris, September 2026
    Excellent Service “Charlotte Barbaroussis has prepared our wills, LPAs and a discretionary trust. She was professional, kind and patient throughout. A very fine person to have looking after us.”

  • Brian Nunan, August 2026
    “I dealt with the group for many years, and no matter which solicitor I used, the results were always the same. Excellent!”

Read more
Send this to a friend