Skip to main content

News story

October 16, 2026

What’s in a letter: Why one small change can spell big trouble for your brand

Can changing one letter really protect your business name? Peter Moody examines recent trade mark disputes involving FLOWERBX and Vogue, and what businesses can learn about protecting their brands.

Drop a letter here, swap one there, and you might think you have a name of your own. Two recent disputes, one involving a florist favoured by Victoria Beckham and the other a dog magazine up against Vogue, show that the law doesn’t always agree.

In the UK, luxury florist FLOWERBX has won a trade mark infringement claim against rival Flowers Box London, which traded as FLOWERSBOX. Flowerbx had registered its name as a trade mark in 2017. The Intellectual Property Enterprise Court found that the two names were highly similar and likely to confuse customers. There was evidence that customers had done exactly that: orders, complaints and online reviews had all gone to the wrong business. The court also found that Flowers Box had taken unfair advantage of its rival’s reputation and marketing.

Flowers Box argued that FLOWERBX simply means “flower box” and should never have been registered. The court disagreed and upheld the mark.

“A name may look available because it isn’t identical to an existing brand, but that doesn’t make it safe to use,” said Peter Moody, consultant at RIAA Barker Gillette. “Flowerbx won because it registered early, used the name consistently and could show that customers associated it with its business.”

Across the Atlantic, Condé Nast is suing independent US title Dogue, a fashion magazine for dogs, arguing that its name and branding suggest a connection with Vogue. The twist is that Dogue started in 2019, years before Vogue published its own “Dogue” issue. The case is at an early stage, but the question is a familiar one: how close is too close?

A lesson for hospitality

The point applies with particular force to restaurants, bars and members’ clubs, where the name above the door is often the business’s most valuable asset. Even the biggest names aren’t immune: in 2024 McDonald’s lost part of its BIG MAC registration in the EU, including for some restaurant services, because it couldn’t prove it was using the mark for them.

“Hospitality businesses tend to grow sideways,” said Peter. “One site becomes a group, a bar adds private dining, a club opens a hotel or launches its own products. The name chosen for a single site may become the most valuable thing the group owns, so it’s worth protecting properly from the outset.”

Practical steps

  • Register early, and cover what you actually do now and plan to do next.
  • Search beyond exact matches for names that sound, look or mean something similar.
  • Keep evidence of use and reputation, including bookings, sales, press coverage, reviews and misdirected enquiries.

“Whether you’re opening a restaurant, launching a members’ club or starting any other venture, check the name, logo and branding properly before you sign the lease, order the signage, or start sales” said Peter. “Changing one letter is rarely enough.”

Flowerbx Ltd v Flowers Box London Ltd [2026] EWHC 2233 (IPEC)

About the author

Peter Moody is a Corporate and Commercial Consultant at RIAA Barker Gillette, with extensive experience advising businesses on corporate, commercial and intellectual property matters. He has particular expertise in the hospitality, leisure and arts sectors, providing practical, commercially focused advice to clients in the UK and internationally. Peter also advises on risk management, commercial negotiations and dispute resolution.

Stay in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter

Stay in touch

By completing your details and submitting this form you confirm you are happy for us to send you marketing communications and that you agree to our Website Privacy Policy and Legal Notice and to us using Mailchimp to process your data.


Sending

News/Insight

  • What’s in a letter: Why one small change can spell big trouble for your brand
    Can changing one letter really protect your business name? Peter Moody examines recent trade mark disputes involving FLOWERBX and Vogue, and what businesses can learn about protecting their brands.


    Read more
  • Service charge disputes in mixed-use properties: who is responsible for what?
    Service charges in mixed-use properties can lead to disagreements between landlords, residential leaseholders and commercial tenants. We explore their legal rights, a recent Court of Appeal decision and how disputes can be resolved.


    Read more
  • The do’s and don’ts of using AI in your business
    AI can help businesses improve efficiency and make informed decisions, but it also comes with risks. Explore the key do’s and don’ts of using AI responsibly, including data protection, legal considerations and the importance of human oversight.


    Read more
  • Next equal pay appeal: when can market pressures justify different pay
    When can recruitment and retention pressures justify different pay? Karen Cole explores the Next equal pay appeal, explaining why equal pay risks remain and what employers should consider when reviewing pay packages and the evidence supporting their


    Read more
  • Domestic Abuse Protection Orders: where are they available and what other protection can you seek?
    Domestic Abuse Protection Orders can offer tailored protection, but availability is currently limited. Pippa Marshall explains how they work, who can apply and the other protective orders available, including non-molestation and occupation orders.


    Read more

What they say...

  • Bryan E, September 2026
    Absolutely outstanding “This firm is super professional, efficient and friendly at the same time. You could not wish for a better service. I have used them for my Will and a range of other matters over many years. I’ve found all the vario

  • Jan Norris, September 2026
    Excellent Service “Charlotte Barbaroussis has prepared our wills, LPAs and a discretionary trust. She was professional, kind and patient throughout. A very fine person to have looking after us.”

  • Brian Nunan, August 2026
    “I dealt with the group for many years, and no matter which solicitor I used, the results were always the same. Excellent!”

  • Client, July 2026
    Constructive and empathetic “I contacted Pippa Marshall at RIAA Barker Gillette through a recommendation regarding a family law matter. Pippa was always clear, efficient, empathetic and helpful, offering constructive insights on my situation. I

  • Dino, July 2026
    A lucky professional meeting! “We had an excellent professional experience to recommend to all those who need legal help in the UK.”

Read more
Send this to a friend