Skip to main content

The firm

SRA Transparency Rules for Employees

Costs in unfair and wrongful dismissal claims in the Employment Tribunals

We will always liaise closely with you at the outset of any instruction to agree on costs before undertaking any item of work.

It is important to us that you understand the upfront costs associated with our instruction. You should be aware that the normal rule in Employment Tribunals is that the parties bear their own costs regardless of the outcome. There are exceptions to this general rule where cases are brought unreasonably or where the conduct of the claim is unreasonable.

Claims for unfair and wrongful dismissal come in various shapes and sizes, and the cost of bringing proceedings will depend on the nature of the issues (for example, whether it is a misconduct case or one dealing with redundancy), the volume of the documentary evidence, the number of witnesses likely to be called and the duration of the final hearing (which is determined by the Employment Tribunal normally at a case management hearing). For these reasons, it is not possible to provide any meaningful estimate of costs in advance of a fuller understanding of the claims.

We set out below the typical range of costs to be expected when a former employee instructs us in relation to advice and representation when bringing a claim against their former employer in the Employment Tribunal for either unfair dismissal or wrongful dismissal. In some cases, it may be possible to agree with us a fixed fee in relation to the work from start to finish, but a fixed fee may not be in your best interests if there is a prospect of early settlement.

The total charges (excluding disbursements) in acting on behalf of a former employee in a claim for unfair or wrongful dismissal will normally be in the region of £30,000 plus VAT at the current rate, being 20% (£36,000 inclusive of VAT) for a simple case. A significant element of our charges will depend on the length of the final hearing before the Employment Tribunal, and this can range from one day in the simplest of cases to two weeks or more in complex cases.  It will also turn on the complexities of the case which might include the number of parties, whether it is necessary to make, or defend applications prior to the final hearing and whether there are allegations of discrimination linked to an unfair dismissal.  For a medium complexity case, the total charges (excluding disbursements) will normally be in the region of £36,000 plus VAT at the current rate, being 20% (£43,200 inclusive of VAT).  For a high complexity case, the total charges (excluding disbursements) will normally be in the region of £45,000 plus VAT at the current rate, being 20% (£54,000 inclusive of VAT). 

Our charges include the following work:

  • taking your full instructions;
  • advising you on the merits;
  • assisting you in referring the claim to ACAS (a mandatory first step prior to proceedings);
  • preparing and filing the ET1 claim form and Particulars of Claim/liaising with counsel in this regard;
  • preparing for and attending a case management hearing (or agreeing on the case management timetable) and briefing counsel for the hearing if appropriate;
  • preparing and agreeing on a list of issues if required;
  • dealing with your disclosure obligations;
  • reviewing the respondent’s disclosure;
  • preparing witness evidence;
  • instructing counsel for the hearing;
  • preparing the case for the final hearing, which will include agreeing and preparing trial bundles, and liaising with counsel and witnesses; and
  • attending the hearing.

In terms of timescales, this is very much dictated by the Employment Tribunal, which sets a timetable and will fix the hearing dates subject to its own resources. You should anticipate an average of a 12-month turnaround from the date a referral is made to ACAS to the date the Employment Tribunal lists for the final hearing.  In some cases, this may be longer depending on which Employment Tribunal the claim is listed.

The indicative cost range does not include our charges for any work that may prove necessary during the claim, which would be unknown at the outset; such as an interim application for specific disclosure or occasioned due to a party’s non-compliance.

In most cases, we recommend that counsel is instructed to represent you at the final hearing. Sometimes, it is appropriate to retain counsel to advise on the merits and to settle the Particulars of Claim. the level of the brief fees for counsel will depend upon their seniority and the duration of the hearing. Counsel’s fees would be a disbursement payable by you and would be in the region of £8,000 plus VAT (£9,600 inclusive of VAT for a one-day hearing). The brief fee covers the preparation for the hearing and the first day. Counsel charges a refresher fee for each additional day, and the range of refresher fees is normally in the region of £1,500 to £3,000 plus VAT (£1,800 to £3,600 inclusive of VAT).

We allocate work based on your case’s complexity and the experience of our fee-earners. Time spent is charged at the fee-earner’s hourly rate.

Fee-EarnerPositionStandard Hourly Charge Out RateYear of Qualification
Karen ColePartner and Head of Department£475 plus VAT2013
Alex DealManaging Partner£600 plus VAT2001
Daniel DownesAssociate Solicitor£350 plus VAT2005
Grayson StuckeySolicitor£200 plus VAT2023

Our charges are subject to VAT, currently 20% in the UK.

Daniel and Grayson’s work is undertaken under the supervision of Karen and Alex.

For full details of our charges, please see the “Charges” section of our general terms of business, a hard copy of which is available upon request.

We are happy to discuss the costs in relation to any item of work we undertake. Contact Karen Cole today to discuss your enquiry.

Stay in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter

Stay in touch

By completing your details and submitting this form you confirm you are happy for us to send you marketing communications and that you agree to our Website Privacy Policy and Legal Notice and to us using Mailchimp to process your data.


Sending

News/Insight

  • Closing the AI skills gap
    Learn how SMEs can close the AI skills gap through practical staff training, checking AI outputs, protecting sensitive data and setting clear policies.


    Read more
  • What’s in a letter: Why one small change can spell big trouble for your brand
    Can changing one letter really protect your business name? Peter Moody examines recent trade mark disputes involving FLOWERBX and Vogue, and what businesses can learn about protecting their brands.


    Read more
  • Service charge disputes in mixed-use properties: who is responsible for what?
    Service charges in mixed-use properties can lead to disagreements between landlords, residential leaseholders and commercial tenants. We explore their legal rights, a recent Court of Appeal decision and how disputes can be resolved.


    Read more
  • The do’s and don’ts of using AI in your business
    AI can help businesses improve efficiency and make informed decisions, but it also comes with risks. Explore the key do’s and don’ts of using AI responsibly, including data protection, legal considerations and the importance of human oversight.


    Read more
  • Next equal pay appeal: when can market pressures justify different pay
    When can recruitment and retention pressures justify different pay? Karen Cole explores the Next equal pay appeal, explaining why equal pay risks remain and what employers should consider when reviewing pay packages and the evidence supporting their


    Read more

What they say...

  • Bryan E, September 2026
    Absolutely outstanding “This firm is super professional, efficient and friendly at the same time. You could not wish for a better service. I have used them for my Will and a range of other matters over many years. I’ve found all the vario

  • Jan Norris, September 2026
    Excellent Service “Charlotte Barbaroussis has prepared our wills, LPAs and a discretionary trust. She was professional, kind and patient throughout. A very fine person to have looking after us.”

  • Brian Nunan, August 2026
    “I dealt with the group for many years, and no matter which solicitor I used, the results were always the same. Excellent!”

  • Client, July 2026
    Constructive and empathetic “I contacted Pippa Marshall at RIAA Barker Gillette through a recommendation regarding a family law matter. Pippa was always clear, efficient, empathetic and helpful, offering constructive insights on my situation. I

  • Dino, July 2026
    A lucky professional meeting! “We had an excellent professional experience to recommend to all those who need legal help in the UK.”

Read more