Skip to main content

News story

May 9, 2022

Ensure equality in residential tenancies

For residential landlords, identity checks on prospective tenants can be challenging and the penalties harsh for getting it wrong; but trying to avoid tenants with complex immigration status is not an option, as this opens the way to claims of unlawful discrimination.

The obligation to conduct so-called ‘right to rent’ checks were first imposed on landlords, or their agents, under the Immigration Act 2014, and later updated in the Immigration Act 2016. The aim was to prevent individuals without lawful immigration status from accessing the private rented sector. The checks apply to all prospective tenants over the age of 18 for a new residential let, whether via a private landlord, lettings agent or an owner-occupier renting to lodgers.

Since the initial checks were set out, the requirements have regularly been updated to reflect changes in the process and digitalisation of services. Most recently a new set of requirements came into force on 6 April 2022, outlining both online and manual right to work checks, depending on the status of the tenant. This includes changes to the way in which the Biometric Residence Card (BRC), Biometric Residence Permit (BRP) and Frontier Worker Permit (FWP) can be used to evidence a holder’s right to rent.

Previously landlords could accept a physical BRP, BRC or FWP as valid proof if it showed an expiry date within the term of the tenancy, but now this must be checked using the Home Office online service. Home Office online checks are also required for individuals who have only digital proof of their immigration status in the UK.

The checks can be extremely complex for some non-UK citizens and a recent House of Commons review of the regulation of private rented housing found 25% of landlords were unwilling to rent to non-British passport holders. But any landlord thinking to avoid their obligations, by deterring prospective foreign tenants or favouring those who are apparently British, could find themselves subject to action under anti-discriminatory measures and the Equality Act 2010.

Landlords who discriminate on the basis of a protected characteristic, such as race or racial grounds, including ‘colour, nationality, and ethnic or national origins’ could find themselves facing a claim for an uncapped level of damages if a prospective tenant with the right to live in the UK is rejected on these grounds. Or if a landlord publishes a discriminatory advertisement or instructs their agent to discriminate, the Equality and Human Rights Commission can bring proceedings.

When faced with all the small print and knowing there are fines or even imprisonment, for incorrectly carrying out right to rent checks, a landlord may think it simpler to look for a tenant who is more easily checked out, but that path is equally risky.

To avoid discrimination, every prospective tenant should be treated exactly the same way, so no one is discouraged or excluded, either directly or indirectly, because of a known or perceived protected characteristic. The right to rent checks should also be undertaken consistently, whether or not a landlord believes someone is a British citizen.

Getting guidance and regular updates on how to manage the checks is ideal, as things can change all the time. As well as the new requirements from 6 April, we recently saw the government release special rules regarding the right to rent checks for Ukrainian nationals escaping the conflict.

It’s also a good idea to adopt the Government checklist and follow the code that is set out, as that will demonstrate best practice and provide a statutory excuse against liability if you are found to have rented to anyone disqualified by reason of immigration status.

Note: This article is not legal advice; it provides information of general interest about current legal issues.

Stay in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter

Stay in touch

By completing your details and submitting this form you confirm you are happy for us to send you marketing communications and that you agree to our Website Privacy Policy and Legal Notice and to us using Mailchimp to process your data.


Sending

News/Insight

  • Converting commercial property into homes: what the latest planning changes mean
    Converting offices and other commercial buildings into homes can create opportunities, but planning rules are only part of the picture. We explain the latest changes and the legal issues property owners, developers and buyers should consider before p


    Read more
  • Closing the AI skills gap
    Learn how SMEs can close the AI skills gap through practical staff training, checking AI outputs, protecting sensitive data and setting clear policies.


    Read more
  • What’s in a letter: Why one small change can spell big trouble for your brand
    Can changing one letter really protect your business name? Peter Moody examines recent trade mark disputes involving FLOWERBX and Vogue, and what businesses can learn about protecting their brands.


    Read more
  • Service charge disputes in mixed-use properties: who is responsible for what?
    Service charges in mixed-use properties can lead to disagreements between landlords, residential leaseholders and commercial tenants. We explore their legal rights, a recent Court of Appeal decision and how disputes can be resolved.


    Read more
  • The do’s and don’ts of using AI in your business
    AI can help businesses improve efficiency and make informed decisions, but it also comes with risks. Explore the key do’s and don’ts of using AI responsibly, including data protection, legal considerations and the importance of human oversight.


    Read more

What they say...

  • Rahul Khanna, October 2026
    Thank you – excellent service “Thank you so much to Qaiser, Vinay and Alex, who were extremely helpful throughout a long-running and complex matter. I really appreciated their clear advice and support.”

  • Client, October 2026
    Feedback “I engaged Karen Cole at RIAA Barker Gillette to support me through a grievance process and help me navigate discussions with my employer. From the outset, Karen provided clear, pragmatic advice and took the time to explain my options,

  • Bryan E, September 2026
    Absolutely outstanding “This firm is super professional, efficient and friendly at the same time. You could not wish for a better service. I have used them for my Will and a range of other matters over many years. I’ve found all the vario

  • Jan Norris, September 2026
    Excellent Service “Charlotte Barbaroussis has prepared our wills, LPAs and a discretionary trust. She was professional, kind and patient throughout. A very fine person to have looking after us.”

  • Brian Nunan, August 2026
    “I dealt with the group for many years, and no matter which solicitor I used, the results were always the same. Excellent!”

Read more
Send this to a friend