Skip to main content

News story

March 1, 2024

Understanding Dyscalculia: Employer’s Guide

This article aims to provide a comprehensive guide for employers regarding dyscalculia, a mathematical learning difficulty affecting approximately 5% of the UK population. In it, we'll look at dyscalculia, its impact on employees and the legal obligations employers have to support neurodivergent employees.

Understanding Dyscalculia: Employer’s Guide

Understanding Dyscalculia

Dyscalculia refers to a specific learning difficulty concerning mathematics. It involves difficulty understanding number concepts, performing calculations, timekeeping, measurement and spatial reasoning. On the other hand, individuals with dyscalculia often exhibit strengths such as creativity, strategic thinking, problem-solving and intuitive thinking.

In the UK, the critical legislation concerning workplace neurodiversity is the Equality Act 2010. It consolidates and expands previous equality laws, protecting neurodivergent workers, who are likely to be classified as ‘disabled’ under the act. The act affords them vital rights to reasonable adjustments and protection against discrimination, harassment and victimisation.

Defining Disability under the Equality Act 2010

For a condition to be considered a disability under the Equality Act 2010, it must be a ‘physical or mental impairment’ that ‘has a substantial and long-term adverse effect’ on a person’s ability to carry out normal day-to-day activities. Therefore, neurodivergent conditions like dyscalculia, a lifelong cognitive difference, are likely to meet the legal definition of ‘long-term’.

Dyscalculia in the Workplace: Challenges and Opportunities

The symptoms of dyscalculia can pose challenges for individuals in their professional lives. These may include difficulties understanding and working with numbers, performing calculations, and remembering mathematical facts, issues related to negative attitudes, timekeeping and planning schedules.

However, supporting neurodivergent employees can offer unique opportunities for organisations. The distinctive cognitive profiles of neurodivergent individuals can bring novel perspectives, creative problem-solving and other skills to the workplace.

Managing Dyscalculia: Reasonable Adjustments

The Equality Act 2010 requires employers to make ‘reasonable adjustments’ for disabled employees to alleviate any substantial disadvantages they might face. These adjustments can be simple and inexpensive but significantly improve workers’ happiness and performance.

Examples of Reasonable Adjustments

Examples of reasonable adjustments for dyscalculic employees can include:

  • Using a calculator for tasks involving calculations
  • Employing calendars and schedules to plan daily activities
  • Setting alarms to keep track of time
  • Structuring breaks into long meetings
  • Providing a second computer screen
  • Agreeing on a later start and finish time to avoid rush hour
  • Varying dress code
  • Providing noise-cancelling headphones to workers who are hypersensitive to sound
  • Varying role responsibilities or agreeing to a transfer to a similar post, where appropriate
  • Providing coaching or a mentor system

Implementing Reasonable Adjustments

While identifying potential adjustments, employers should always consult with the worker and only implement changes with their consent. If an employer can’t afford an adjustment, the worker might be eligible for support under the Access to Work scheme.

When an employer disputes that a person has a disability under the Equality Act, the burden of proof falls on the claimant. For invisible disabilities, such as dyscalculia, this is likely to involve providing or commissioning expert evidence.

Real-life example

In 2023, in an Employment Tribunal claim, Molyneux v Apprentify Ltd, Miss Molyneaux brought successful claims, including discrimination arising from disability and failure to make reasonable adjustments, when her employer dismissed her from apprenticeship for failing a mock maths exam in circumstances where she found maths difficult because of her dyscalculia. In this case, the Tribunal awarded Miss Molyneaux £53,348.25.

Conclusion

Understanding dyscalculia and its implications is crucial for employers to ensure a diverse, inclusive, and productive workplace environment. By recognising the unique strengths of neurodivergent employees and making reasonable adjustments, employers can not only comply with the law but also create a workplace that values individual strengths and promotes innovation.

Speak to us today to ensure your current workplace practices and policies comply with your legal obligations. In particular, if you have a staff member who is, or might be, considered disabled, you must consider suitable reasonable adjustments. Putting your best foot forward in this complicated area of employment law is the best way to avoid defending potential claims in the Employment Tribunal, which, as Apprentify Ltd found out, can result in significant awards to successful claimants, given that discrimination claims are uncapped.

Note: This article is not legal advice; it provides information of general interest about current legal issues.

Stay in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter

Stay in touch

By completing your details and submitting this form you confirm you are happy for us to send you marketing communications and that you agree to our Website Privacy Policy and Legal Notice and to us using Mailchimp to process your data.


Sending

News/Insight

  • Converting commercial property into homes: what the latest planning changes mean
    Converting offices and other commercial buildings into homes can create opportunities, but planning rules are only part of the picture. We explain the latest changes and the legal issues property owners, developers and buyers should consider before p


    Read more
  • Closing the AI skills gap
    Learn how SMEs can close the AI skills gap through practical staff training, checking AI outputs, protecting sensitive data and setting clear policies.


    Read more
  • What’s in a letter: Why one small change can spell big trouble for your brand
    Can changing one letter really protect your business name? Peter Moody examines recent trade mark disputes involving FLOWERBX and Vogue, and what businesses can learn about protecting their brands.


    Read more
  • Service charge disputes in mixed-use properties: who is responsible for what?
    Service charges in mixed-use properties can lead to disagreements between landlords, residential leaseholders and commercial tenants. We explore their legal rights, a recent Court of Appeal decision and how disputes can be resolved.


    Read more
  • The do’s and don’ts of using AI in your business
    AI can help businesses improve efficiency and make informed decisions, but it also comes with risks. Explore the key do’s and don’ts of using AI responsibly, including data protection, legal considerations and the importance of human oversight.


    Read more

What they say...

  • Rahul Khanna, October 2026
    Thank you – excellent service “Thank you so much to Qaiser, Vinay and Alex, who were extremely helpful throughout a long-running and complex matter. I really appreciated their clear advice and support.”

  • Client, October 2026
    Feedback “I engaged Karen Cole at RIAA Barker Gillette to support me through a grievance process and help me navigate discussions with my employer. From the outset, Karen provided clear, pragmatic advice and took the time to explain my options,

  • Bryan E, September 2026
    Absolutely outstanding “This firm is super professional, efficient and friendly at the same time. You could not wish for a better service. I have used them for my Will and a range of other matters over many years. I’ve found all the vario

  • Jan Norris, September 2026
    Excellent Service “Charlotte Barbaroussis has prepared our wills, LPAs and a discretionary trust. She was professional, kind and patient throughout. A very fine person to have looking after us.”

  • Brian Nunan, August 2026
    “I dealt with the group for many years, and no matter which solicitor I used, the results were always the same. Excellent!”

Read more
Send this to a friend