Skip to main content

Insight article

September 28, 2023

UK approach to AI regulation

AI is rapidly advancing and revolutionising how we live, work and interact with technology. AI makes the impossible possible, and the future holds great promise for how this technology can transform our world. However, as with any ground-breaking technology, risks and challenges are associated with the development and implementation of AI, which society must consider and address to ensure a responsible and beneficial outcome for all.

AI Regulation - the UK's approach - picture to go with article. Picture of a man at a computer with overlaid images.

In March 2023, the government produced its white paper “A pro-innovation approach to AI regulation“. The white paper follows the government’s AI regulation paper published in 2022.

Through its white paper, the government hopes to promote responsible innovation and uphold public confidence in this ground-breaking technology. It covers issues we face as AI advances, provides recommendations to overcome specific problems and sets out a regulatory framework.

The proposed regulatory framework

Unlike the EU, the UK government does not plan to adopt new legislation to regulate AI. Nor will it create a new regulator. It will rely on existing regulators to apply essential safety, transparency, and accountability principles to emerging AI. It says, “By rushing to legislate too early, we would risk placing undue burdens on businesses.” Plus, it would be difficult for legislation to keep up with this advancing technology.

The government believes its regulatory approach is flexible and adaptable and will promote innovation that can move with the times.

The paper also acknowledges the importance of international cooperation in regulating AI. It highlights the need for global standards and collaboration between nations.

The good and the bad

AI’s potential for good is vast:

  • Bias-Busting Potential: Quantum computing coupled with AI chatbots, as suggested by physicist Kaku Michio, could help eliminate bias and discrimination from AI outcomes, ensuring fairness for all.
  • Medical Marvels: AI’s application in healthcare can lead to faster and more accurate diagnoses, personalised treatment plans, and drug discoveries, revolutionising medical practices and saving lives.
  • Efficiency Boost: AI can automate tasks, increasing productivity and freeing humans from mundane work, ultimately driving economic growth.
  • Advanced Accountability: The combination of AI and quantum computing might pave the way for more transparent and accountable AI systems, making tracking and rectifying potential issues easier.

However, as with much innovation, AI also brings with it potential dangers:

  • Potential Biased Outcomes: AI’s reliance on biased training data can perpetuate unfair outcomes, deepening societal biases and causing discriminatory effects on individuals and groups.
  • Opaque Complexity: Understanding and evaluating AI systems is complex, making assigning responsibility and accountability for any adverse consequences challenging.
  • Job Disruption: The automation potential of AI poses a significant threat to jobs across industries, leading to potential unemployment and economic instability.
  • Data Dangers: Gathering extensive data for AI applications raises privacy and data protection concerns, as AI could uncover personal information without consent.
  • Safety and Security Risks:
  • AI’s susceptibility to cyberattacks and its use in critical sectors such as healthcare and transportation raises safety and security apprehensions.

The UK’s five AI regulatory framework principles

The UK government has adopted five fundamental principles to underpin the framework to guide and inform the responsible use and development of AI:

  1. Safety, security and robustness
  2. Appropriate transparency and explanation
  3. Fairness
  4. Accountability and governance
  5. Contestability and redress

The proposed regulatory framework and the legal sector

AI regulation is set to reshape the legal arena dramatically. It’s about fairness, ethics, and accountability.

Think AI-driven legal decisions that are not just swift but are inherently just —a massive change to an industry built on precedent. Envision AI pouring over case law, laying out its reasoning transparently, open for ethical scrutiny.

But it doesn’t stop there. Privacy takes the spotlight. Imagine AI that can predict case outcomes by diving into historical data without compromising privacy. AI that can draft airtight contracts, optimising terms with historical data while fiercely guarding client secrets.

AI in law isn’t just about efficiency; it’s about upholding trust in a system as old as civilisation.

The bottom line is that AI’s role in the law is imminent, where decisions are just, privacy is paramount, and trust is non-negotiable. Get ready for an innovative and unshakably principled legal landscape powered by AI.

Conclusion

Although the UK government has taken a light touch approach to regulation, the UK’s policy may go some way to allaying concerns raised by high-profile individuals, such as Geoffrey Hinton ‘the godfather of AI’ and Elon Musk, that it is not mindlessly going, in the words of Star Trek, “Where no man has gone before”, and that its approach is both considered and flexible to keep up with this fast-paced tech.

The proposed AI regulatory framework provides necessary protection to steady the pace of the rapidly evolving AI technology and all its implications, with significant benefits for individuals and society, provided that it is carefully implemented and monitored to ensure that it achieves its intended goals.

Contact corporate partner Victoria Holland today.

Note: This article is not legal advice; it provides information of general interest about current legal issues.

Stay in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter

Stay in touch

By completing your details and submitting this form you confirm you are happy for us to send you marketing communications and that you agree to our Website Privacy Policy and Legal Notice and to us using Mailchimp to process your data.


Sending

News/Insight

  • Supporting neurodiverse people in family law matters
    Understanding neurodiversity in the legal context.


    Read more
  • Supreme court ruling on referees’ employment status
    In PGMOL v HMRC, the Supreme Court considered whether professional referees were self-employed. The case has the potential for far-reaching implications across the employment world.


    Read more
  • Business First Magazine
    Read our expert insights on key workplace and corporate issues.


    Read more
  • Why is clear contract drafting important?
    How simple contract clauses can protect your business.


    Read more
  • Ensuring equality: A legal guide to responsibilities and compliance
    Understanding equal opportunities in the workplace


    Read more

What they say...

  • Ian, April 2025
    “Martin and his team at Barker Gillette acted for us in our purchase and sale of property. The chain was lengthy and elements of the work became complex. Martin was tenacious and resolved to answer our queries as they arose. He handled all aspe

  • Henry, April 2025
    “We have purchased flats before with 2 different solicitors who were unable to help us this time. Martin came highly recommended and are we glad. He was very professional in every way: knowledgeable, approachable, he has a friendly manner, very

  • Megan Purcell-Jones, April 2025
    “Charlotte was extremely diligent and thorough. She talked us through the process of making our wills and listened to and understood our needs and the complexities involved. Extremely patient and very clear.”

  • Hena, April 2025
    “Great experience, Patrick was very clear and gave time to explain the legal processes. Friendly and professional communication made me feel comfortable asking questions, received great legal advice.”

  • Michael Constable, April 2025
    “I wanted to revise my will and appoint RIAA Barker Gillette as my Executor and Trustees. This was handled very efficiently and professionally. It helped that I had agreed a fixed fee in advance.” Review left for: Herman Cheung

Read more
Send this to a friend