Skip to main content

News story

February 29, 2020

To suspend, or not to suspend, that is the question

In the recent High Court case Harrison v Barking Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Ms Harrison, the Trust’s Deputy Head of Legal Service, successfully argued that her suspension was unreasonable.

Facts

Ms Harrison, having been suspended following concerns about her handling of a clinical negligence case, had not been provided with details of the allegations and was subsequently diagnosed with stress.

She was asked to return to work on a phased basis and severely restricted duties. Ms Harrison refused because it was a demotion and contrary to medical advice. She was suspended again for failing to obey an instruction. Ms Harrison sought an injunction to allow her to return to work and perform most of her normal duties.

The Court’s decision

Ms Harrison successfully claimed that her employer had breached its implied duty of trust and confidence and that her health was being harmed as a result. A mandatory injunction was ordered for her to resume most of her normal work duties.

The Court’s reasoning

  1. Crucially, the criticisms of her casework, which were used to justify her suspension, were not made until after she was suspended.
  2. There was no evidence that allowing her to resume her normal duties, except clinical negligence casework, would cause harm to her employer. In contrast, there was a provable detriment to Ms Harrison’s health and professional reputation.

Lesson to be learned

An employer should not suspend employees in a broad-brush fashion. Any suspension should be based on supporting evidence which is available at the time the decision is made, and it should always be a proportionate response.

With the benefit of legal advice, the Trust may have opted not to suspend, thereby saving the expense of a costly court case, management downtime, reputational damage and indeed, the detriment suffered by Ms Harrison.

It is vital that robust workplace policies and procedures, which are fair and reasonable, are adhered to and particularly so when conducting internal investigations.

Karen Cole can review your workplace policies and advise you on any investigation. Call her today.

Note: This is not legal advice; it provides information of general interest about current legal issues.

Stay in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter

Stay in touch

By completing your details and submitting this form you confirm you are happy for us to send you marketing communications and that you agree to our Website Privacy Policy and Legal Notice and to us using Mailchimp to process your data.


Sending

News/Insight

  • Neuroinclusion in the workplace
    With a varied workforce, businesses in the UK need to provide inclusive policies and practices. One key area that employers must address is neuroinclusion.


    Read more
  • RIAA Barker Gillette (UK) appoints Brinda Granthrai as Partner and Head of Commercial Real Estate
    London, May 2025


    Read more
  • Strategic lifetime gifting
    How to minimise your IHT liability during your lifetime.


    Read more
  • Navigating directors’ duties
    Legal responsibilities and risks for UK company directors


    Read more
  • Preparing a business-lasting power of attorney
    In this article, private client solicitor Herman Cheung of West End law firm RIAA Barker Gillette (UK) considers the advantages, needs and practical examples of creating a bu


    Read more

What they say...

  • Michael, May 2025
    “Very pleased with the services provided by Charlotte Barbaroussis. Particularly found her quick and effective to reply to any queries.”

  • Malcolm & Sheila Blackmore, May 2025
    “My wife and I engaged RIAA Barker Gillette to prepare our wills and LPOA’s. James McMullan and Charlotte Barbaroussis were the epitome of professionalism – responding quickly, talking us through the legalese, clearly answering any

  • Ian, April 2025
    “Martin and his team at Barker Gillette acted for us in our purchase and sale of property. The chain was lengthy and elements of the work became complex. Martin was tenacious and resolved to answer our queries as they arose. He handled all aspe

  • Henry, April 2025
    “We have purchased flats before with 2 different solicitors who were unable to help us this time. Martin came highly recommended and are we glad. He was very professional in every way: knowledgeable, approachable, he has a friendly manner, very

  • Megan Purcell-Jones, April 2025
    “Charlotte was extremely diligent and thorough. She talked us through the process of making our wills and listened to and understood our needs and the complexities involved. Extremely patient and very clear.”

Read more
Send this to a friend