Skip to main content

News story

March 4, 2019

The Highly Contentious ‘Non-Contentious Probate (Fees) Order 2018’

While it may appear that Brexit is the only topic of conversation in government today, at the beginning of February Parliament met to discuss The Non-Contentious Probate (Fees) Order 2018, which unlike its name has been highly contentious since its inception.

Unfortunately, the order, which comes into force in April 2019, is no April Fool and sets out a new sliding scale structure for probate fees.

Since 2014, there has been a flat fee of £215 when applying for probate in person or £155 when applying via a solicitor. From April, the fee will depend on the estate’s net value, i.e. the value of the estate less any debts due at the date of death.

Value of EstateNew FeeDifference*
£50,000 and below£0–
£50,000 to £300,000£250£35
£300,000 to £500,000£750£535
£500,000 to £1m£2,500£2,285
£1m to £1.6m£4,000£3,785
£1.6m to £2m£5,000£4,785
Above £2m£6,000£5,785

 

* difference between the new fee and the personal application fee of £215.

 While the order may come as good news for estates valued at less than £50,000, many estates will see a substantial increase in probate fees.

The contentious issue

The order has been criticised for several reasons, mainly because it increases the probate fee in line with the estate’s value. This increase has been described as an “enhanced fee” by Justice Minister Lucy Frazer. However, it is essentially just another tax. The fee is payable in addition to Inheritance Tax, which currently stands at 40%. It has therefore been labelled a “stealth tax” and even a “death tax”.

It has been argued that the fees must be increased to fund the additional work the court must undertake when issuing a Grant of Probate for larger estates. This is not strictly true, as a high-value estate may not necessarily have more assets than a lower-value estate. Some MPs have even agreed that the Probate Registry doesn’t necessarily do more work when issuing a Grant of Probate for larger estates.

Is there anything positive about the order?

The original proposal was to increase probate fees so that larger estates would face fees of up to £20,000. This caused a furious outcry from many interested parties, and the proposal was then scrapped in light of the impending general election on 8 June 2017. These estates will now pay £6,000, a saving of £14,000 compared to the earlier proposal.

Who pays and when?

This fee is payable when making an application for a Grant of Probate. This means it is payable before many of the deceased’s accounts or investments have been realised. The query then arises as to who will pay the fee. The bereaving family? Allegedly some Ministers have brushed off the fee increase and suggested that the family can apply for a loan to pay the “enhanced fee”.

From April 2019, careful consideration is needed when planning the distribution of your estate to ensure that your beneficiaries aren’t left with an upfront cost of up to £6,000.

For further advice and information, contact James McMullan today.

Notes:

(1) This is not legal advice; it is intended to provide information of general interest about current legal issues.

(2) This article was published on 4 March 2019 and amended on 26 March 2019 to reflect the current political delay to the Non-Contentious Probate (Fees) Order 2018 becoming statute.

Note: This article is not legal advice; it provides information of general interest about current legal issues.

Stay in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter

Stay in touch

By completing your details and submitting this form you confirm you are happy for us to send you marketing communications and that you agree to our Website Privacy Policy and Legal Notice and to us using Mailchimp to process your data.


Sending

News/Insight

  • The do’s and don’ts of using AI in your business
    AI can help businesses improve efficiency and make informed decisions, but it also comes with risks. Explore the key do’s and don’ts of using AI responsibly, including data protection, legal considerations and the importance of human oversight.


    Read more
  • Next equal pay appeal: when can market pressures justify different pay
    When can recruitment and retention pressures justify different pay? Karen Cole explores the Next equal pay appeal, explaining why equal pay risks remain and what employers should consider when reviewing pay packages and the evidence supporting their


    Read more
  • Domestic Abuse Protection Orders: where are they available and what other protection can you seek?
    Domestic Abuse Protection Orders can offer tailored protection, but availability is currently limited. Pippa Marshall explains how they work, who can apply and the other protective orders available, including non-molestation and occupation orders.


    Read more
  • Missing beneficiaries and unknown heirs: what should executors do?
    What should an executor do if someone entitled to inherit cannot be found? James McMullan explains how to trace missing beneficiaries, the limits of statutory notices and the options to consider before distributing an estate.


    Read more
  • Pay transparency in recruitment: Is your business ready to disclose salaries?
    Employers may eventually have to provide salary information much earlier in the recruitment process under proposals being considered by the Government.


    Read more

What they say...

  • Bryan E, September 2026
    Absolutely outstanding “This firm is super professional, efficient and friendly at the same time. You could not wish for a better service. I have used them for my Will and a range of other matters over many years. I’ve found all the vario

  • Jan Norris, September 2026
    Excellent Service “Charlotte Barbaroussis has prepared our wills, LPAs and a discretionary trust. She was professional, kind and patient throughout. A very fine person to have looking after us.”

  • Brian Nunan, August 2026
    “I dealt with the group for many years, and no matter which solicitor I used, the results were always the same. Excellent!”

  • Client, July 2026
    Constructive and empathetic “I contacted Pippa Marshall at RIAA Barker Gillette through a recommendation regarding a family law matter. Pippa was always clear, efficient, empathetic and helpful, offering constructive insights on my situation. I

  • Dino, July 2026
    A lucky professional meeting! “We had an excellent professional experience to recommend to all those who need legal help in the UK.”

Read more
Send this to a friend