Skip to main content

News story

March 4, 2019

The Highly Contentious ‘Non-Contentious Probate (Fees) Order 2018’

While it may appear that Brexit is the only topic of conversation in government today, at the beginning of February Parliament met to discuss The Non-Contentious Probate (Fees) Order 2018, which unlike its name has been highly contentious since its inception.

Unfortunately, the order, which comes into force in April 2019, is no April Fool and sets out a new sliding scale structure for probate fees.

Since 2014, there has been a flat fee of £215 when applying for probate in person or £155 when applying via a solicitor. From April, the fee will depend on the estate’s net value, i.e. the value of the estate less any debts due at the date of death.

Value of EstateNew FeeDifference*
£50,000 and below£0
£50,000 to £300,000£250£35
£300,000 to £500,000£750£535
£500,000 to £1m£2,500£2,285
£1m to £1.6m£4,000£3,785
£1.6m to £2m£5,000£4,785
Above £2m£6,000£5,785

 

* difference between the new fee and the personal application fee of £215.

 While the order may come as good news for estates valued at less than £50,000, many estates will see a substantial increase in probate fees.

The contentious issue

The order has been criticised for several reasons, mainly because it increases the probate fee in line with the estate’s value. This increase has been described as an “enhanced fee” by Justice Minister Lucy Frazer. However, it is essentially just another tax. The fee is payable in addition to Inheritance Tax, which currently stands at 40%. It has therefore been labelled a “stealth tax” and even a “death tax”.

It has been argued that the fees must be increased to fund the additional work the court must undertake when issuing a Grant of Probate for larger estates. This is not strictly true, as a high-value estate may not necessarily have more assets than a lower-value estate. Some MPs have even agreed that the Probate Registry doesn’t necessarily do more work when issuing a Grant of Probate for larger estates.

Is there anything positive about the order?

The original proposal was to increase probate fees so that larger estates would face fees of up to £20,000. This caused a furious outcry from many interested parties, and the proposal was then scrapped in light of the impending general election on 8 June 2017. These estates will now pay £6,000, a saving of £14,000 compared to the earlier proposal.

Who pays and when?

This fee is payable when making an application for a Grant of Probate. This means it is payable before many of the deceased’s accounts or investments have been realised. The query then arises as to who will pay the fee. The bereaving family? Allegedly some Ministers have brushed off the fee increase and suggested that the family can apply for a loan to pay the “enhanced fee”.

From April 2019, careful consideration is needed when planning the distribution of your estate to ensure that your beneficiaries aren’t left with an upfront cost of up to £6,000.

For further advice and information, contact James McMullan today.

Notes:

(1) This is not legal advice; it is intended to provide information of general interest about current legal issues.

(2) This article was published on 4 March 2019 and amended on 26 March 2019 to reflect the current political delay to the Non-Contentious Probate (Fees) Order 2018 becoming statute.

Note: This article is not legal advice; it provides information of general interest about current legal issues.

Stay in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter

Stay in touch

By completing your details and submitting this form you confirm you are happy for us to send you marketing communications and that you agree to our Website Privacy Policy and Legal Notice and to us using Mailchimp to process your data.


Sending

News/Insight

  • Transactional documents in a corporate sale: What sellers should know
    Once due diligence is complete and terms are agreed, the focus turns to negotiating the transactional documents that underpin a share or asset sale. This guide explains the purpose of the key documents involved in business acquisitions and why carefu


    Read more
  • Employer warning as immigration raids hit record high 
    Employers are being urged to review their recruitment procedures after new figures revealed that immigration enforcement raids have reached record levels across the UK.


    Read more
  • Planning for the future: What to include in a UK shareholders’ agreement
    A well-drafted agreement sets clear ground rules for how the company is run, how decisions are made, and what happens when circumstances change.


    Read more
  • Understanding Court of Protection applications in England and Wales
    When someone can no longer make decisions for themselves and has not put a Lasting Power of Attorney in place, the Court of Protection can step in. This article explains what the Court of Protection does, when an application may be needed, and what t


    Read more
  • Warranties and indemnities: Key protections in share and asset sales
    An overview of warranties and indemnities in share and asset sales, explaining key differences, common protections, liability limits and risk allocation.


    Read more

What they say...

  • Laura Kelly, February 2026
    Review of legal guidance received “I recently worked with Patrick Simpson on my settlement agreement. Patrick guided me through every stage with exceptional care and diligence. He kept the process moving efficiently, always updating me promptly

  • Prasanna Sooriakumaran, February 2026
    “Really good, especially at dealing with the company that tried to overplay their hand. I highly recommend.”

  • Sharla Munian, February 2026
    Outstanding Legal Support and a Brilliant Result “I cannot recommend RIAA Barker Gillette highly enough. My solicitor supported me throughout a very challenging property litigation matter, and thanks to her expertise, dedication, and strategic

  • Client, February 2026
    Very good service in disagreement with architect “RIAA assisted me in a conflict I had with my architect, who wanted to overcharge me. The end result was satisfactory, with invoices reasonable despite being slightly higher than expected!”

  • Sharla Munian, February 2026
    Outstanding Solicitor Who Delivered the Outcome I Hoped For “After a number of years navigating a complex financial settlement following my separation, my solicitor has been incredible from start to finish. Their professionalism, patience, and

Read more
Send this to a friend