Skip to main content

News story

July 26, 2017

Supreme Court rule Employment Tribunal fees are unlawful

UNISON sought judicial review of the Fees Order because it unlawfully prevents/restricts access to justice.

The Supreme Court today allowed UNISON’s appeal. It held that fees imposed in respect of proceedings in employment tribunals (ET) and the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) are unlawful because of their effects on access to justice. This means that the government must repay fees paid by claimants to date.

Until the Employment Tribunals and the Employment Appeal Tribunal Fees Order 2013 (the Fees Order) came into force, a claimant could bring and pursue proceedings in an ET and appeal to the EAT without paying any fee. However, the Fees Order prescribes various fees with amounts depending on the type of claim and whether a single claimant or a group brought it.

UNISON sought judicial review of the Fees Order because it unlawfully prevents/restricts access to justice.

The lower courts dismissed UNISON’s claim. However, a seven-judge Supreme Court unanimously allowed its appeal. It held that the Fees Order was unlawful from the beginning “ab initio” and must therefore be quashed. The judgement is deemed as a massive win for workers.

View the full judgment here or speak to employment lawyer Karen Cole to learn more.

Note: This is not legal advice; it provides information of general interest about current legal issues.

Stay in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter

Stay in touch

By completing your details and submitting this form you confirm you are happy for us to send you marketing communications and that you agree to our Website Privacy Policy and Legal Notice and to us using Mailchimp to process your data.


Sending

News/Insight

  • Supporting neurodiverse people in family law matters
    Understanding neurodiversity in the legal context.


    Read more
  • Supreme court ruling on referees’ employment status
    In PGMOL v HMRC, the Supreme Court considered whether professional referees were self-employed. The case has the potential for far-reaching implications across the employment world.


    Read more
  • Business First Magazine
    Read our expert insights on key workplace and corporate issues.


    Read more
  • Why is clear contract drafting important?
    How simple contract clauses can protect your business.


    Read more
  • Ensuring equality: A legal guide to responsibilities and compliance
    Understanding equal opportunities in the workplace


    Read more

What they say...

  • Ian, April 2025
    “Martin and his team at Barker Gillette acted for us in our purchase and sale of property. The chain was lengthy and elements of the work became complex. Martin was tenacious and resolved to answer our queries as they arose. He handled all aspe

  • Henry, April 2025
    “We have purchased flats before with 2 different solicitors who were unable to help us this time. Martin came highly recommended and are we glad. He was very professional in every way: knowledgeable, approachable, he has a friendly manner, very

  • Megan Purcell-Jones, April 2025
    “Charlotte was extremely diligent and thorough. She talked us through the process of making our wills and listened to and understood our needs and the complexities involved. Extremely patient and very clear.”

  • Hena, April 2025
    “Great experience, Patrick was very clear and gave time to explain the legal processes. Friendly and professional communication made me feel comfortable asking questions, received great legal advice.”

  • Michael Constable, April 2025
    “I wanted to revise my will and appoint RIAA Barker Gillette as my Executor and Trustees. This was handled very efficiently and professionally. It helped that I had agreed a fixed fee in advance.” Review left for: Herman Cheung

Read more
Send this to a friend