Skip to main content

Insight article

December 1, 2017

Landlords: Securing possession of a dwelling house

All Landlords will be aware that it is an offence to evict an occupier of residential premises without a Court Order or to harass an occupier of residential premises (Section 1 Protection from Eviction Act 1977 - the PFE).

A residential occupier is defined as “a person occupying the premises as a residence, whether under a contract or by virtue of any enactment or rule of law giving him the right to remain in occupation or restricting the right of any other person to recover possession of the premises”. Section 1 of the PFE only applies to those who have occupied the premises under a tenancy or a licence and not to trespassers.

There are various types of residential tenancies regulated by statute, which can only be brought to an end in a particular way. The more common examples are:

  • an assured tenancy
  • an assured shorthold tenancy (an AST)
  • a Rent Act tenancy

Assuming the appropriate notices have been given consequent upon which proceedings are issued leading to orders granting possession if the occupier does not give up possession in accordance with the terms of the Court Order, the Landlord will need to consider its next step.

To enforce an Order for possession, the Landlord must apply for a warrant or writ of possession. For speed, Landlords often apply to transfer Possession Orders made in the County Court to the High Court because an eviction can usually be carried out more quickly by a High Court Enforcement Officer. It is prudent to ask for a transfer upon the grant of a Possession Order rather than wasting time by making an additional application and waiting for an Order consequent upon that.

Once transferred, the Landlord applies to the High Court for permission to issue a Writ of Possession under the Civil Procedure Rules. This task is usually delegated to the High Court Enforcement Officers. It is, however, important to ensure that the procedural steps to obtain a Writ of Possession are properly followed. This entails:

  • Giving every person in actual possession of the property notice of the intention to apply for a Writ of Possession. The notice does not confer any new rights on a tenant or other occupier. The effect is to give those who may apply for relief a sufficient opportunity to do so. No time period is specified. However, a seven-day notice is prudent in the circumstances.
  • At the expiration of seven days, a request for the issue of a Writ of Possession is lodged with the King’s Bench Division of the High Court supported by:
    • a draft Order for permission to issue a Writ of Possession;
    • an Application Notice; and
    • a witness statement in support of the application, setting out the grounds of the application and confirming compliance with the requirement to give notice to all occupants before the issue of the application.

The application is considered on paper by a High Court Master. A Writ of Possession can be ordered on the day of the application. Once armed with a Writ of Possession, the High Court Enforcement Officers can effect the eviction of the occupants of the dwelling house and secure the premises in favour of the Landlord.

There is one final matter, however, which needs to be addressed. The Enforcement Officers will serve a notice under the Torts (Interference with Goods) Act 1977 giving the occupants a notice of intention to sell or dispose of goods left in the property. This is to cover the situation where the occupants do not remove their belongings. Prudently, at least seven days should be allowed to enable the occupants to remove their effects under the supervision of the Enforcement Officers. The Landlord should not interfere with this process. Once the process is complete, the Landlord can take charge of the keys and the property and deal with it as it thinks fit.

For more information, speak to M. Qaiser Khanzada today.

Note: This article is not legal advice; it provides information of general interest about current legal issues.

There are various types of residential tenancies regulated by statute which can only be brought to an end in a particular way.

Stay in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter

Stay in touch

By completing your details and submitting this form you confirm you are happy for us to send you marketing communications and that you agree to our Website Privacy Policy and Legal Notice and to us using Mailchimp to process your data.


Sending

News/Insight

  • Converting commercial property into homes: what the latest planning changes mean
    Converting offices and other commercial buildings into homes can create opportunities, but planning rules are only part of the picture. We explain the latest changes and the legal issues property owners, developers and buyers should consider before p


    Read more
  • Closing the AI skills gap
    Learn how SMEs can close the AI skills gap through practical staff training, checking AI outputs, protecting sensitive data and setting clear policies.


    Read more
  • What’s in a letter: Why one small change can spell big trouble for your brand
    Can changing one letter really protect your business name? Peter Moody examines recent trade mark disputes involving FLOWERBX and Vogue, and what businesses can learn about protecting their brands.


    Read more
  • Service charge disputes in mixed-use properties: who is responsible for what?
    Service charges in mixed-use properties can lead to disagreements between landlords, residential leaseholders and commercial tenants. We explore their legal rights, a recent Court of Appeal decision and how disputes can be resolved.


    Read more
  • The do’s and don’ts of using AI in your business
    AI can help businesses improve efficiency and make informed decisions, but it also comes with risks. Explore the key do’s and don’ts of using AI responsibly, including data protection, legal considerations and the importance of human oversight.


    Read more

What they say...

  • Rahul Khanna, October 2026
    Thank you – excellent service “Thank you so much to Qaiser, Vinay and Alex, who were extremely helpful throughout a long-running and complex matter. I really appreciated their clear advice and support.”

  • Client, October 2026
    Feedback “I engaged Karen Cole at RIAA Barker Gillette to support me through a grievance process and help me navigate discussions with my employer. From the outset, Karen provided clear, pragmatic advice and took the time to explain my options,

  • Bryan E, September 2026
    Absolutely outstanding “This firm is super professional, efficient and friendly at the same time. You could not wish for a better service. I have used them for my Will and a range of other matters over many years. I’ve found all the vario

  • Jan Norris, September 2026
    Excellent Service “Charlotte Barbaroussis has prepared our wills, LPAs and a discretionary trust. She was professional, kind and patient throughout. A very fine person to have looking after us.”

  • Brian Nunan, August 2026
    “I dealt with the group for many years, and no matter which solicitor I used, the results were always the same. Excellent!”

Read more
Send this to a friend