Skip to main content

Insight article

December 1, 2017

Landlords: Securing possession of a dwelling house

All Landlords will be aware that it is an offence to evict an occupier of residential premises without a Court Order or to harass an occupier of residential premises (Section 1 Protection from Eviction Act 1977 - the PFE).

A residential occupier is defined as “a person occupying the premises as a residence, whether under a contract or by virtue of any enactment or rule of law giving him the right to remain in occupation or restricting the right of any other person to recover possession of the premises”. Section 1 of the PFE only applies to those who have occupied the premises under a tenancy or a licence and not to trespassers.

There are various types of residential tenancies regulated by statute, which can only be brought to an end in a particular way. The more common examples are:

  • an assured tenancy
  • an assured shorthold tenancy (an AST)
  • a Rent Act tenancy

Assuming the appropriate notices have been given consequent upon which proceedings are issued leading to orders granting possession if the occupier does not give up possession in accordance with the terms of the Court Order, the Landlord will need to consider its next step.

To enforce an Order for possession, the Landlord must apply for a warrant or writ of possession. For speed, Landlords often apply to transfer Possession Orders made in the County Court to the High Court because an eviction can usually be carried out more quickly by a High Court Enforcement Officer. It is prudent to ask for a transfer upon the grant of a Possession Order rather than wasting time by making an additional application and waiting for an Order consequent upon that.

Once transferred, the Landlord applies to the High Court for permission to issue a Writ of Possession under the Civil Procedure Rules. This task is usually delegated to the High Court Enforcement Officers. It is, however, important to ensure that the procedural steps to obtain a Writ of Possession are properly followed. This entails:

  • Giving every person in actual possession of the property notice of the intention to apply for a Writ of Possession. The notice does not confer any new rights on a tenant or other occupier. The effect is to give those who may apply for relief a sufficient opportunity to do so. No time period is specified. However, a seven-day notice is prudent in the circumstances.
  • At the expiration of seven days, a request for the issue of a Writ of Possession is lodged with the King’s Bench Division of the High Court supported by:
    • a draft Order for permission to issue a Writ of Possession;
    • an Application Notice; and
    • a witness statement in support of the application, setting out the grounds of the application and confirming compliance with the requirement to give notice to all occupants before the issue of the application.

The application is considered on paper by a High Court Master. A Writ of Possession can be ordered on the day of the application. Once armed with a Writ of Possession, the High Court Enforcement Officers can effect the eviction of the occupants of the dwelling house and secure the premises in favour of the Landlord.

There is one final matter, however, which needs to be addressed. The Enforcement Officers will serve a notice under the Torts (Interference with Goods) Act 1977 giving the occupants a notice of intention to sell or dispose of goods left in the property. This is to cover the situation where the occupants do not remove their belongings. Prudently, at least seven days should be allowed to enable the occupants to remove their effects under the supervision of the Enforcement Officers. The Landlord should not interfere with this process. Once the process is complete, the Landlord can take charge of the keys and the property and deal with it as it thinks fit.

For more information, speak to M. Qaiser Khanzada today.

Note: This article is not legal advice; it provides information of general interest about current legal issues.

There are various types of residential tenancies regulated by statute which can only be brought to an end in a particular way.

Stay in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter

Stay in touch

By completing your details and submitting this form you confirm you are happy for us to send you marketing communications and that you agree to our Website Privacy Policy and Legal Notice and to us using Mailchimp to process your data.


Sending

News/Insight

  • Dilapidations explained: What commercial tenants and landlords need to know
    Dilapidations are a common source of dispute at the end of a commercial lease. They can involve significant sums of money and often come as an unwelcome surprise to tenants who believed they had left a property in reasonable condition. Understanding


    Read more
  • The role of due diligence in corporate transactions
    In corporate transactions, due diligence is a key stage that usually follows agreement of Heads of Terms, allowing the Buyer to investigate the target company or its assets before committing to the deal.


    Read more
  • Love in later life and the inheritance tax trap
    Increasingly, lawyers are seeing couples who have chosen to live together rather than marry, sometimes for many years, without fully appreciating how differently the law treats them, particularly when it comes to inheritance tax and financial protect


    Read more
  • Understanding Heads of Terms in corporate transactions
    Heads of terms are a crucial first step in corporate transactions. Learn what they include, why they matter, and how they shape successful deals.


    Read more
  • Flexible working requests: A guide for employers and employees
    This guide explains the statutory process for flexible working requests, outlines employer obligations and shares best practices to help navigate requests effectively.  


    Read more

What they say...

  • Amish Bristol, January 2026
    Absolutely brilliant, fast, professional, clear and delivered a robust service “Recent mortgage oversight from Ben Marks and Anne was superbly dealt with, and I intend on moving all my business to them. For a big firm, they really do pay attent

  • Client, January 2026
    Excellent experience “The process of my work was quick and effective.”

  • Vicky, January 2026
    Clear, friendly, helpful “Very efficient and helpful with arrangements for my will.”

  • R Cook, December 2025
    Settlement Sorted “Grayson Stuckey was great. Efficient and friendly with all aspects of the support provided. We worked well together and achieved a positive outcome. Recommended.”

  • Ivan Naisbitt, December 2025
    More than just a service “Michael Davies has been representing me for about 35 years, and I cannot recommend him or RIAA Barker Gillette (UK) highly enough. Aside from the normal conveyancing, he is always on hand to advise and guide you throug

Read more
Send this to a friend