Skip to main content

News story

March 22, 2016

RICS arbitration service launched

RICS arbitration service for construction and engineering disputes

The obligation placed on parties to consider alternative dispute resolution (ADR) mechanisms is well documented. It’s one of the subjects of our ever-evolving laws. Parties to a dispute (and their lawyers) must actively consider ADR.

ADR ranges from non-binding processes, such as without prejudice roundtable meetings to mediation, to binding processes, such as expert determinations and arbitration. Resorting to the courts is often called “the last tool in the toolbox”.

It is normally prudent for the parties to explore non-binding forms of ADR first as often this is the most cost-effective way to resolve a dispute. Where that is not appropriate, or it has failed, parties should go on to consider binding ADR processes ranging from expert determinations to arbitration.

The Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (RICS) has launched a new arbitration service specifically for construction and engineering disputes.

The RICS arbitration service offers:

  • Fast track arbitration services for disputes under £100,000. The fast track caps a party’s recoverable costs, limits the amount arbitrators can charge and requires the publication of arbitration awards every six months.
  • A select arbitration service intended to provide a “viable alternative” to the Technology and Construction Court for high-value complex disputes publishing awards within 12 months.

The advantage of the RICS arbitration service is that it can achieve a more comprehensive deliberation of the issues rather than the current adjudication process (which can often be cursory in approach). Currently, only the fast track arbitration service rules are available on the website; RICS plan further development in time.

This RICS arbitration service illustrates the ever-evolving methods of ADR promoted by various professions.

Practitioners who do not advise their clients of all of the alternatives available to them could find themselves facing questions, complaints and possible claims from their clients if they have not advised them of cheaper and quicker alternatives to the Court process.

Contact property litigator Laura St-Gallay for more information about the RICS arbitration service.

Note: This article is not legal advice; it provides information of general interest about current legal issues.

Stay in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter

Stay in touch

By completing your details and submitting this form you confirm you are happy for us to send you marketing communications and that you agree to our Website Privacy Policy and Legal Notice and to us using Mailchimp to process your data.


Sending

News/Insight

  • Strategic lifetime gifting
    How to minimise your IHT liability during your lifetime.


    Read more
  • Navigating directors’ duties
    Legal responsibilities and risks for UK company directors


    Read more
  • Preparing a business-lasting power of attorney
    In this article, private client solicitor Herman Cheung of West End law firm RIAA Barker Gillette (UK) considers the advantages, needs and practical examples of creating a bu


    Read more
  • Can you make a WhatsApp will?
    Key legal requirements and future outlook.


    Read more
  • Supporting neurodiverse people in family law matters
    Understanding neurodiversity in the legal context.


    Read more

What they say...

  • Michael, May 2025
    “Very pleased with the services provided by Charlotte Barbaroussis. Particularly found her quick and effective to reply to any queries.”

  • Malcolm & Sheila Blackmore, May 2025
    “My wife and I engaged RIAA Barker Gillette to prepare our wills and LPOA’s. James McMullan and Charlotte Barbaroussis were the epitome of professionalism – responding quickly, talking us through the legalese, clearly answering any

  • Ian, April 2025
    “Martin and his team at Barker Gillette acted for us in our purchase and sale of property. The chain was lengthy and elements of the work became complex. Martin was tenacious and resolved to answer our queries as they arose. He handled all aspe

  • Henry, April 2025
    “We have purchased flats before with 2 different solicitors who were unable to help us this time. Martin came highly recommended and are we glad. He was very professional in every way: knowledgeable, approachable, he has a friendly manner, very

  • Megan Purcell-Jones, April 2025
    “Charlotte was extremely diligent and thorough. She talked us through the process of making our wills and listened to and understood our needs and the complexities involved. Extremely patient and very clear.”

Read more
Send this to a friend