Skip to main content

Insight article

November 8, 2023

Overzealous employee monitoring may overstep data protection boundaries

Employers who use software to help manage productivity and other employee activity may inadvertently violate data protection regulations.

Employee monitoring lady's hands at a keyboard

Can employers monitor employees?

You can monitor employees if you do it in a way which is consistent with data protection law.

Data protection law does not prevent employers from monitoring employees. Instead, it requires employers to do so in compliance with existing data protection laws. Equally important is the Human Rights Act 1998, which concerns a person’s right to respect for private and family life. With the rise of homeworking and increased employer monitoring, this right is becoming increasingly important and relevant. An employee’s expectation of privacy is likely to be significantly higher when working at home. Yet, the risk of recording private information increases the more employees work from home. Employers must balance employee’s rights and freedoms against their business interests.

Impact of remote/hybrid working

Electronic monitoring of employees has risen in tandem with the rise in home working triggered by the Covid-19 pandemic. While the number working from home has dropped from its peak of 49% during the 2020 lockdowns, most recent figures from the Office of National Statistics show that around 40% of working adults still work from home at least some of the time.  

Before the pandemic, the figure was around 12.5%, and the dramatic shift has driven businesses and organisations into uncharted territory to manage their workforce. Many have addressed the challenge by increasing electronic monitoring to tackle any loosening of control.  

New research from the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO), which oversees and regulates data protection and freedom of information in the UK, found that 19% of those surveyed believe an employer has monitored them.  

Asked how they felt about being monitored, 70% of those surveyed by the ICO said it was intrusive. Only 19% were comfortable taking a new job where an employer would monitor their activity.

This discomfort echoes findings by the Trades Union Congress (TUC) in 2022, which found significant and growing support amongst workers for stronger regulation of AI and tech-driven workplace surveillance, with more than 70% saying they believed technology-informed decision-making could increase unfair treatment. The TUC research found some sectors reporting very high levels of surveillance, for instance, more than 70% across the financial industry and the wholesale and retail sectors.

Employment solicitor Patrick Simpson explains:

“Developments in software have made a range of options available to employers, making it all too easy to implement a form of monitoring, whether to check if people start work on time or to monitor activity – such as through the number of keystrokes made. However, employers should not take that ease of monitoring for granted. Any monitoring has to comply with data protection law.

There’s also the potential breakdown in trust and reputational damage that may come through implementing what employees may consider to be a surveillance culture.”

Patrick added: 

“Any surveillance must measure up against at least one of these criteria. However, it may be tricky in some situations because of the imbalance in an employer/employee relationship. In some circumstances, employees may feel they are risking their jobs if they dispute a planned form of monitoring.

The best approach is to ensure that any action is legal and that employees know what is happening and have a sense of trust. It’s too easy for surveillance to feel like an invasion of privacy, whether or not it passes the legal test. Policies must also be regularly reviewed and updated to align with technological advancement.”

Six situations where employee monitoring is allowed

  • Consent
  • Contract
  • Legal obligation
  • Vital interests
  • Public tasks
  • Legitimate interests

To support organisations in ensuring that any employee monitoring is lawful, transparent and fair, the ICO has issued guidance for employers, which highlights some of the key considerations:

  1. Making employees aware of the nature, extent and reasons for monitoring.
  2. Having a clearly defined purpose and using the least intrusive means to achieve it.
  3. Having a lawful basis for processing employees’ data – such as consent or legal obligation.
  4. Telling employees about any monitoring in a way that is easy to understand.
  5. Only keeping the information which is relevant to its purpose.
  6. Carrying out a Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA) for any monitoring likely to result in a high risk to the rights of employees.
  7. Making the personal information collected through monitoring available to employees if they make a Subject Access Request (SAR).

The privacy watchdog has also warned employers, saying they will take action against employers if they threaten people’s privacy.

What is a Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA)?

DPIAs are a formal procedure through which an organisation can assess the impact of data processing activities and protect personal data. Under the Data Protection Act 2018, you must carry out a DPIA when processing personal data is “likely to result in a high risk to the rights and freedoms of natural persons.”

Even if not legally required, completing a DPIA helps you identify and minimise the risks of any monitoring activity you plan. The DPIA process includes a step to discuss your plans to introduce monitoring with employees. This step will help to shape your plans and build trust with your employees.

Speak to employment solicitor Patrick Simpson today for practical guidance on this complicated area of law. He can help ensure your business complies with data protection obligations and minimise the risk of claims from disgruntled employees.

Note: This article is not legal advice; it provides information of general interest about current legal issues.

Stay in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter

Stay in touch

By completing your details and submitting this form you confirm you are happy for us to send you marketing communications and that you agree to our Website Privacy Policy and Legal Notice and to us using Mailchimp to process your data.


Sending

News/Insight

  • Supporting neurodiverse people in family law matters
    Understanding neurodiversity in the legal context.


    Read more
  • Supreme court ruling on referees’ employment status
    In PGMOL v HMRC, the Supreme Court considered whether professional referees were self-employed. The case has the potential for far-reaching implications across the employment world.


    Read more
  • Business First Magazine
    Read our expert insights on key workplace and corporate issues.


    Read more
  • Why is clear contract drafting important?
    How simple contract clauses can protect your business.


    Read more
  • Ensuring equality: A legal guide to responsibilities and compliance
    Understanding equal opportunities in the workplace


    Read more

What they say...

  • Ian, April 2025
    “Martin and his team at Barker Gillette acted for us in our purchase and sale of property. The chain was lengthy and elements of the work became complex. Martin was tenacious and resolved to answer our queries as they arose. He handled all aspe

  • Henry, April 2025
    “We have purchased flats before with 2 different solicitors who were unable to help us this time. Martin came highly recommended and are we glad. He was very professional in every way: knowledgeable, approachable, he has a friendly manner, very

  • Megan Purcell-Jones, April 2025
    “Charlotte was extremely diligent and thorough. She talked us through the process of making our wills and listened to and understood our needs and the complexities involved. Extremely patient and very clear.”

  • Hena, April 2025
    “Great experience, Patrick was very clear and gave time to explain the legal processes. Friendly and professional communication made me feel comfortable asking questions, received great legal advice.”

  • Michael Constable, April 2025
    “I wanted to revise my will and appoint RIAA Barker Gillette as my Executor and Trustees. This was handled very efficiently and professionally. It helped that I had agreed a fixed fee in advance.” Review left for: Herman Cheung

Read more
Send this to a friend