Skip to main content

News story

May 2, 2022

No blame but challenges remain…

When the clock finally chimed for no-fault divorce, courts saw a surge in petitions from couples looking to avoid the blame game but challenges still lie ahead for couples leaving a marriage.

HM Courts & Tribunals Service has revealed that some 3,000 applications were made in the week that the Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Act 2020 (which incorporates ‘no-fault’ divorce) came into force, compared with a weekly average of 2,000 over the previous year.

The new Act came into force on 6 April 2022, and the long-awaited change allows married couples to issue divorce proceedings without assigning blame. Only a statement of irretrievable breakdown is needed, and it also makes it possible to file for divorce jointly so couples can reflect a mutual agreement to part. Previously, the only alternative to blaming one partner for adultery, desertion or unreasonable behaviour was to go through a period of separation.

The aim is to make divorce less confrontational across the board but will support victims of domestic abuse, as the application for divorce cannot be contested, and they can avoid making allegations requiring investigation or supporting evidence. These are changes long demanded by family lawyers, and the Act represents a major step forward for those looking to leave abusive marriages.

However, some aspects of the new rules are causing concern. While the Act requires that a minimum of 26 weeks elapse between the start of the divorce proceedings and the final divorce order being made, professionals have highlighted that the new process could result in the other party finding out about the divorce proceedings with little notice.

That’s because the 26-week period of notification of proceedings runs from the date the petition is filed with the court, not from the date that proceedings are served on the respondent. While the new rules nominally provide for service on the respondent within 28 days, in practice, the applicant may not follow the provision, and the court cannot reset the timetable if service is delayed.

The applicant can apply for the conditional order at any time from 20 weeks after the filing of the papers at court, provided the respondent has been served at some stage, and then six weeks later, the application can be made for the final decree.

Family solicitor Pippa Marshall explains:

“As long as the notice is served on the other spouse at some point before the end of the initial 20 weeks, this is sufficient notice in law for the divorce to proceed. If the notice is received at a late stage, it could mean someone finds themselves with little opportunity to take legal advice, to manage finances or request special considerations, such as the divorce taking place in a foreign jurisdiction.

Once the final decree is granted, it may be too late to raise important matters such as sharing of pensions or other financial claims, as the Act does not require the financial order to be in place beforehand.

Being able to apply for a no-fault divorce is a huge step forward, but we see opportunities to reform the process by which financial arrangements and childcare provisions are made on divorce. It would also ease future marriage breakdown if there were formal recognition of prenuptial agreements, so couples had more certainty and avoid arguing about finances if the worst happens.”

If you wish to utilise ‘no-fault’ divorce or have a question about it, speak to family solicitor Pippa Marshall today.

Note: This article is not legal advice; it provides information of general interest about current legal issues.

Stay in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter

Stay in touch

By completing your details and submitting this form you confirm you are happy for us to send you marketing communications and that you agree to our Website Privacy Policy and Legal Notice and to us using Mailchimp to process your data.


Sending

News/Insight

  • The do’s and don’ts of using AI in your business
    AI can help businesses improve efficiency and make informed decisions, but it also comes with risks. Explore the key do’s and don’ts of using AI responsibly, including data protection, legal considerations and the importance of human oversight.


    Read more
  • Next equal pay appeal: when can market pressures justify different pay
    When can recruitment and retention pressures justify different pay? Karen Cole explores the Next equal pay appeal, explaining why equal pay risks remain and what employers should consider when reviewing pay packages and the evidence supporting their


    Read more
  • Domestic Abuse Protection Orders: where are they available and what other protection can you seek?
    Domestic Abuse Protection Orders can offer tailored protection, but availability is currently limited. Pippa Marshall explains how they work, who can apply and the other protective orders available, including non-molestation and occupation orders.


    Read more
  • Missing beneficiaries and unknown heirs: what should executors do?
    What should an executor do if someone entitled to inherit cannot be found? James McMullan explains how to trace missing beneficiaries, the limits of statutory notices and the options to consider before distributing an estate.


    Read more
  • Pay transparency in recruitment: Is your business ready to disclose salaries?
    Employers may eventually have to provide salary information much earlier in the recruitment process under proposals being considered by the Government.


    Read more

What they say...

  • Bryan E, September 2026
    Absolutely outstanding “This firm is super professional, efficient and friendly at the same time. You could not wish for a better service. I have used them for my Will and a range of other matters over many years. I’ve found all the vario

  • Jan Norris, September 2026
    Excellent Service “Charlotte Barbaroussis has prepared our wills, LPAs and a discretionary trust. She was professional, kind and patient throughout. A very fine person to have looking after us.”

  • Brian Nunan, August 2026
    “I dealt with the group for many years, and no matter which solicitor I used, the results were always the same. Excellent!”

  • Client, July 2026
    Constructive and empathetic “I contacted Pippa Marshall at RIAA Barker Gillette through a recommendation regarding a family law matter. Pippa was always clear, efficient, empathetic and helpful, offering constructive insights on my situation. I

  • Dino, July 2026
    A lucky professional meeting! “We had an excellent professional experience to recommend to all those who need legal help in the UK.”

Read more