Skip to main content

News story

September 27, 2017

A new class of limited partnership for private funds

The Private Fund Limited Partnership (PFLP) is a new sub-category of limited partnership which came into existence earlier this year. It aims to reduce financial and administrative burdens on general partners/managers as well as providing greater legal certainty for limited partners.

The PFLP is likely to be the default choice for private fund managers using the limited partnership structure and introduces a list of permitted actions that limited partners can take without risking their limited liability status.

What is a PFLP?

A limited partnership may be classed as a PFLP if it satisfies, confirms and complies with the “private fund conditions”, such as being constituted by an agreement in writing and a collective investment scheme (defined under section 235(1) of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000).

Limited partnerships can become a PFLP at any time. However, once actioned, the process is irreversible and the partnership can never return to its original limited partnership status.

Limitation of liability

PFLP limited partners may undertake actions detailed on the ‘white list’. The white list is broad and gives certainty to limited partners that they can carry on their usual activities, for investors in private investment funds, without losing their limited liability status.

The list is by no means exhaustive, and it will be a matter of commercial agreement between the partners as to whether limited partners may carry on ‘white list’ activities.

Key advantages of PFLPs

Relaxation of capital requirements

PFLP limited partners are not required to contribute capital or property to the partnership, and if they do choose to contribute, they may withdraw such capital or property without being held liable for any debts and obligations to the amount withdrawn.

Simplification of filing requirements

Fewer changes in the partnership need to be notified to the Registrar of Companies. PFLPs are not required to advertise changes in the London, Edinburgh or Belfast Gazette, apart from advertising when a person is no longer a general partner.

Removal of some statutory duties

PFLP limited partners do not have to comply with the Partnership Act 1890’s duties to render accounts and account for profits from competing businesses as HM Treasury said these duties were not consistent with the role of an investor in an investment fund.

More flexibility in winding up a PFLP

Current legislation requires that a limited partnership must be wound up by its general partner (unless a court orders otherwise).

Where there is no general partner, a PFLP’s limited partners may appoint someone who is not a limited partner to carry out the winding-up of the PFLP.

Where there is a general partner, the partners can agree to someone other than the general partner carrying out the winding-up.

Being struck off the Companies House PFLP register

Further Government consultation is needed in this regard, as there is currently no procedure in place to remove a limited partnership from the Register. The original proposal introduced a procedure so that PFLPs could be struck off the Register. However, the Government has decided to explore and consult on this point later.

Speak to corporate partner Victoria Holland today if you have a question regarding a Private Fund Limited Partnership.

Note: This article is not legal advice; it provides information of general interest about current legal issues.

Stay in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter

Stay in touch

By completing your details and submitting this form you confirm you are happy for us to send you marketing communications and that you agree to our Website Privacy Policy and Legal Notice and to us using Mailchimp to process your data.


Sending

News/Insight

  • Can you make a WhatsApp will?
    Key legal requirements and future outlook.


    Read more
  • Supporting neurodiverse people in family law matters
    Understanding neurodiversity in the legal context.


    Read more
  • Supreme court ruling on referees’ employment status
    In PGMOL v HMRC, the Supreme Court considered whether professional referees were self-employed. The case has the potential for far-reaching implications across the employment world.


    Read more
  • Business First Magazine
    Read our expert insights on key workplace and corporate issues.


    Read more
  • Why is clear contract drafting important?
    How simple contract clauses can protect your business.


    Read more

What they say...

  • Ian, April 2025
    “Martin and his team at Barker Gillette acted for us in our purchase and sale of property. The chain was lengthy and elements of the work became complex. Martin was tenacious and resolved to answer our queries as they arose. He handled all aspe

  • Henry, April 2025
    “We have purchased flats before with 2 different solicitors who were unable to help us this time. Martin came highly recommended and are we glad. He was very professional in every way: knowledgeable, approachable, he has a friendly manner, very

  • Megan Purcell-Jones, April 2025
    “Charlotte was extremely diligent and thorough. She talked us through the process of making our wills and listened to and understood our needs and the complexities involved. Extremely patient and very clear.”

  • Hena, April 2025
    “Great experience, Patrick was very clear and gave time to explain the legal processes. Friendly and professional communication made me feel comfortable asking questions, received great legal advice.”

  • Michael Constable, April 2025
    “I wanted to revise my will and appoint RIAA Barker Gillette as my Executor and Trustees. This was handled very efficiently and professionally. It helped that I had agreed a fixed fee in advance.” Review left for: Herman Cheung

Read more
Send this to a friend