Skip to main content

News story

February 24, 2017

Vacant properties ‘stolen’ by fraudsters

A recent High Court case, Dreamvar (UK) Ltd -v- Mishcon De Reya (A Firm), demonstrated that the Land Registry could spot a fraudulent transaction.

Back in 2003, the Land Registry stopped issuing Land Certificates, and many property lawyers warned that ‘dematerialisation’ would make life easier for fraudsters.

Sadly, those who predicted going ‘paperless’ and registering the ownership of houses in a similar way to the registration of cars at the DVLA have been proved right, and property fraud is increasing.

A recent High Court case, Dreamvar (UK) Ltd -v- Mishcon De Reya (A Firm), demonstrated that the Land Registry could spot a fraudulent transaction… but only after the ‘purchase’ monies had been transferred to China!

Vacant mortgage-free properties are particularly vulnerable. Fraudsters occupy them, posing as ‘law-abiding tenants’ and then pretending to be the owners of the property. In such cases, the true owner is often an ‘absent landlord’ or one who lives abroad.

It takes a bit of luck as well as savvy to pull off such criminal activities. In the above court case, the property was in London, but the fraudster instructed a firm of solicitors in Manchester to represent him as the ‘seller’.

The Manchester firm did not go far enough with their ID checks and so believed they were representing the property’s true owner. They were also not curious as to why their ‘seller’ client appeared to know so little about his house when they had to reply to enquiries raised by the purchaser’s solicitors.

The fraudster frequently gave good reasons for needing a quick ‘sale’ and said he was going through a nasty divorce and worried that his wife might try to block the proposed sale.

On the day of completion, the Manchester firm transferred the sale proceeds to another firm of solicitors, and from there, approximately £1.1m was transferred to China.

When the Land Registry received the application to register the duped purchaser as the new owner, they spotted a discrepancy which revealed that the ‘sale’ was fraudulent.

The good news is that owners of vacant or tenanted properties should not feel helpless and are able to take steps to make fraud more difficult into their own hands.

The proprietorship register can contain up to four addresses for service for the true owner, including an email address, and the Land Registry offers a Property Alert Service.

This service alerts an owner if an application is made for official copies of the ‘deeds’ or the title register to the property.

Signing up for this service would allow you early on to spot whether your house or flat might be being targeted!

If you’re concerned about fraudulent transactions, speak to John Gillette today.

Note: This article is not legal advice; it provides information of general interest about current legal issues.

Stay in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter

Stay in touch

By completing your details and submitting this form you confirm you are happy for us to send you marketing communications and that you agree to our Website Privacy Policy and Legal Notice and to us using Mailchimp to process your data.


Sending

News/Insight

  • Converting commercial property into homes: what the latest planning changes mean
    Converting offices and other commercial buildings into homes can create opportunities, but planning rules are only part of the picture. We explain the latest changes and the legal issues property owners, developers and buyers should consider before p


    Read more
  • Closing the AI skills gap
    Learn how SMEs can close the AI skills gap through practical staff training, checking AI outputs, protecting sensitive data and setting clear policies.


    Read more
  • What’s in a letter: Why one small change can spell big trouble for your brand
    Can changing one letter really protect your business name? Peter Moody examines recent trade mark disputes involving FLOWERBX and Vogue, and what businesses can learn about protecting their brands.


    Read more
  • Service charge disputes in mixed-use properties: who is responsible for what?
    Service charges in mixed-use properties can lead to disagreements between landlords, residential leaseholders and commercial tenants. We explore their legal rights, a recent Court of Appeal decision and how disputes can be resolved.


    Read more
  • The do’s and don’ts of using AI in your business
    AI can help businesses improve efficiency and make informed decisions, but it also comes with risks. Explore the key do’s and don’ts of using AI responsibly, including data protection, legal considerations and the importance of human oversight.


    Read more

What they say...

  • Rahul Khanna, October 2026
    Thank you – excellent service “Thank you so much to Qaiser, Vinay and Alex, who were extremely helpful throughout a long-running and complex matter. I really appreciated their clear advice and support.”

  • Client, October 2026
    Feedback “I engaged Karen Cole at RIAA Barker Gillette to support me through a grievance process and help me navigate discussions with my employer. From the outset, Karen provided clear, pragmatic advice and took the time to explain my options,

  • Bryan E, September 2026
    Absolutely outstanding “This firm is super professional, efficient and friendly at the same time. You could not wish for a better service. I have used them for my Will and a range of other matters over many years. I’ve found all the vario

  • Jan Norris, September 2026
    Excellent Service “Charlotte Barbaroussis has prepared our wills, LPAs and a discretionary trust. She was professional, kind and patient throughout. A very fine person to have looking after us.”

  • Brian Nunan, August 2026
    “I dealt with the group for many years, and no matter which solicitor I used, the results were always the same. Excellent!”

Read more
Send this to a friend