Skip to main content

Insight article

March 6, 2017

Employers to pay apprenticeship levy

The apprenticeship levy is due to come into force in April 2017

The apprenticeship levy will require all UK employers, in both the private and public sectors (with annual wage bills of more than £3m – including bonus and commission payments), to pay 0.5% of their annual wage bill towards the cost of apprenticeship training.

This cost cannot be passed onto the employee. However, because of the wage bill eligibility criteria, most employers will not have to pay any levy. It will continue to have government support to pay for apprenticeship training.

The levy itself is designed to fund new apprenticeships and replaces the current system whereby employers choose and pay for the apprenticeship training they want.

It aims to increase economic productivity by investing in human capital and allowing individuals to pursue a career they may not have otherwise.

The government expects that the levy will lead to increased growth and profitability for businesses and increase wages in the long term.

The levy is due to come into force in April 2017.

Employers starting an apprentice before April 2017 will receive funding under the current system. That funding will continue for the duration of the apprenticeship.

The reforms are intended to simplify some of the current complex arrangements for apprenticeships and make it easier for employers to select the apprenticeship training they want to purchase.

Each year employers will have a levy allowance of £15k. However, connected companies will only have £15k to share between them, for example, a parent company and its subsidiaries.

This is similar to the existing Employment Allowance connected persons’ rule and paid through the PAYE system. Employers already contributing to an industry-wide training levy (such as the Construction Industry Training Board Levy, the “CITB”) don’t get off the hook and will still pay a levy.

Once employers have paid the levy, they can access apprenticeship funding through a new service account. Funds in the account will pay for apprenticeship training and assessment with an approved provider/assessment organisation, and the government will top this amount up by 10%. Note: that if funds are not utilised within 24 months, they will expire.

Employers must retain all records relating to the levy calculation for at least three years.

Provisions have been put in place for assessments to be carried out by HMRC. Suppose HMRC becomes aware that the apprenticeship levy has been underpaid or that an excessive amount has been repaid. In that case, they can assess and collect the estimated amount due for one or more tax periods in a tax year. HMRC may assess the whole of the apprenticeship levy or one or more named employees.

The government has published useful guidance on how apprenticeship funding for employers will work, including details of funding bands and the apprenticeship levy at the gov.uk website.

Call Karen Cole today if you have Apprenticeship Levy queries.

Note: This is not legal advice; it is intended to provide information of general interest about current legal issues.

Stay in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter

Stay in touch

By completing your details and submitting this form you confirm you are happy for us to send you marketing communications and that you agree to our Website Privacy Policy and Legal Notice and to us using Mailchimp to process your data.


Sending

News/Insight

  • Converting commercial property into homes: what the latest planning changes mean
    Converting offices and other commercial buildings into homes can create opportunities, but planning rules are only part of the picture. We explain the latest changes and the legal issues property owners, developers and buyers should consider before p


    Read more
  • Closing the AI skills gap
    Learn how SMEs can close the AI skills gap through practical staff training, checking AI outputs, protecting sensitive data and setting clear policies.


    Read more
  • What’s in a letter: Why one small change can spell big trouble for your brand
    Can changing one letter really protect your business name? Peter Moody examines recent trade mark disputes involving FLOWERBX and Vogue, and what businesses can learn about protecting their brands.


    Read more
  • Service charge disputes in mixed-use properties: who is responsible for what?
    Service charges in mixed-use properties can lead to disagreements between landlords, residential leaseholders and commercial tenants. We explore their legal rights, a recent Court of Appeal decision and how disputes can be resolved.


    Read more
  • The do’s and don’ts of using AI in your business
    AI can help businesses improve efficiency and make informed decisions, but it also comes with risks. Explore the key do’s and don’ts of using AI responsibly, including data protection, legal considerations and the importance of human oversight.


    Read more

What they say...

  • Rahul Khanna, October 2026
    Thank you – excellent service “Thank you so much to Qaiser, Vinay and Alex, who were extremely helpful throughout a long-running and complex matter. I really appreciated their clear advice and support.”

  • Client, October 2026
    Feedback “I engaged Karen Cole at RIAA Barker Gillette to support me through a grievance process and help me navigate discussions with my employer. From the outset, Karen provided clear, pragmatic advice and took the time to explain my options,

  • Bryan E, September 2026
    Absolutely outstanding “This firm is super professional, efficient and friendly at the same time. You could not wish for a better service. I have used them for my Will and a range of other matters over many years. I’ve found all the vario

  • Jan Norris, September 2026
    Excellent Service “Charlotte Barbaroussis has prepared our wills, LPAs and a discretionary trust. She was professional, kind and patient throughout. A very fine person to have looking after us.”

  • Brian Nunan, August 2026
    “I dealt with the group for many years, and no matter which solicitor I used, the results were always the same. Excellent!”

Read more