Skip to main content

News story

January 28, 2022

Consumer credit and competition law reforms

Consumer legislation in England and Wales aims to maintain lower prices, produce better products and services and uphold consumer rights. However, this legislation is inadequate at protecting consumers, and reforms are due.

The proposed reforms aim to safeguard consumers’ cash and eradicate the exploitation of online customers, as economic recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic relies heavily on the markets and consumers’ confidence in them.

The regulator and its powers

The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) is the competition regulator in the UK. Current legislation is inadequate because the CMA is slow to act, and its sanctions are too weak to deter.

The government suggests that the reforms will give enhanced power to the CMA for breaches of consumer protection legislation such as increased financial penalties (up to 10% of a global turnover) and the ability to enforce consumer law directly rather than having to go through the process of taking the business to court.

The government hopes that the increased powers available to the CMA will hold businesses accountable and protect consumers from the following issues.

Subscription traps

The first issue identified for reform is subscription traps for online consumers, such as automatic subscription renewals and hidden fees.

In response to this commonly experienced issue, the government will start requiring businesses clearly to inform customers of what they are signing up for, the minimum contract terms and all relevant billing information. In addition, the proposal to make businesses allow the customer to choose whether to re-subscribe should tackle the problem of auto-renewal and make it easier to cancel subscriptions.

These changes are most likely to affect the digital services industry, and companies within that industry may need to alter their business models to accommodate the proposed changes.

Fake reviews

Another critical issue that threatens consumer confidence is online fake or misleading reviews. Not only do fake reviews distort the market, but they also undermine fair competition and ultimately undercut consumer trust in the market.

The Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008 prohibit these unfair practices by businesses. However, in its reforms, the government intends to make it illegal to pay someone to write or host a fake review.

Dodgy business tactics

The final issue the government intends to tackle with its reforms is ‘dodgy business tactics’. For example, companies use websites to display their products in a particular order to influence consumer choice. These tactics limit consumers’ ability to make informed choices and harm fair competition as businesses can pay to have their products feature highly on a trader’s website without disclosing this.

These reforms are essential because consumer trust is key to economic recovery. Fair market competition will assist both big and small businesses. It provides more opportunities and ensures that companies provide the best possible service to their customers and do not use unfair tactics to influence the market. However, these reforms are undetailed proposals, so which reforms, if any, are brought into legislation remains to be seen.

Contact corporate lawyer Victoria Holland to check your company complies with consumer law and is ready for any planned changes in legislation.

Note: This article is not legal advice; it provides information of general interest about current legal issues.

Stay in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter

Stay in touch

By completing your details and submitting this form you confirm you are happy for us to send you marketing communications and that you agree to our Website Privacy Policy and Legal Notice and to us using Mailchimp to process your data.


Sending

News/Insight

  • Supporting neurodiverse people in family law matters
    Understanding neurodiversity in the legal context.


    Read more
  • Supreme court ruling on referees’ employment status
    In PGMOL v HMRC, the Supreme Court considered whether professional referees were self-employed. The case has the potential for far-reaching implications across the employment world.


    Read more
  • Business First Magazine
    Read our expert insights on key workplace and corporate issues.


    Read more
  • Why is clear contract drafting important?
    How simple contract clauses can protect your business.


    Read more
  • Ensuring equality: A legal guide to responsibilities and compliance
    Understanding equal opportunities in the workplace


    Read more

What they say...

  • Ian, April 2025
    “Martin and his team at Barker Gillette acted for us in our purchase and sale of property. The chain was lengthy and elements of the work became complex. Martin was tenacious and resolved to answer our queries as they arose. He handled all aspe

  • Henry, April 2025
    “We have purchased flats before with 2 different solicitors who were unable to help us this time. Martin came highly recommended and are we glad. He was very professional in every way: knowledgeable, approachable, he has a friendly manner, very

  • Megan Purcell-Jones, April 2025
    “Charlotte was extremely diligent and thorough. She talked us through the process of making our wills and listened to and understood our needs and the complexities involved. Extremely patient and very clear.”

  • Hena, April 2025
    “Great experience, Patrick was very clear and gave time to explain the legal processes. Friendly and professional communication made me feel comfortable asking questions, received great legal advice.”

  • Michael Constable, April 2025
    “I wanted to revise my will and appoint RIAA Barker Gillette as my Executor and Trustees. This was handled very efficiently and professionally. It helped that I had agreed a fixed fee in advance.” Review left for: Herman Cheung

Read more
Send this to a friend