Skip to main content

News story

October 1, 2014

Commercial rent arrears recovery from 6 April 2014

On 6 April 2014, the government abolished the common law right known as “distress”, no longer allowing a landlord to seize a tenant’s goods and sell them to recover outstanding rent arrears.

The ancient law of distress has existed since before the Magna Carta, but a new statutory regime known as Commercial Rent Arrears Recovery (“CRAR”) is coming into place. Provided for by the Tribunal Courts and Enforcement Act 2007, the Regulations
(Taking Control of Goods 2013) have only recently come in.

Seizure of a tenant’s goods remains in principle, but Commercial Rent Arrears Recovery has some key changes, potentially affecting its usage and
effectiveness. The key changes are:

  • A requirement for a notice to be served on the tenant before goods are seized;
  • Removing the ability for a landlord to seize goods from mixed-use premises; and
  • Preventing a landlord from taking control of goods if the tenant’s arrears fall below a new minimum level.

In addition, some other important points to note are:

The Lease

Distress only applied to commercial leases. That has not changed. However, CRAR has an additional requirement that the lease has to be in writing, so it cannot be exercised in relation to oral tenancies and nor can it be exercised in relation to licences (whether in writing or not).

The Premises

CRAR applies only to premises let and used solely for commercial purposes. However, a lease will still fall within the scope of CRAR if the residential occupation breaches the lease terms.

Recoverable Rent: the use of distress, historically, was for all sums reserved as rent under the lease. CRAR has significantly limited this, and not all sums regarding service charges, rates, repairs or insurance are recoverable, even if reserved as rent under the lease. However, you can use CRAR to recover VAT and interest due on rent.

Notice of Enforcement

One of the Landlord’s positive features of distress was that there was no requirement to serve notice of the intention to seize goods. Many a Landlord managed to recoup goods in lieu of monies owing to them through a “midnight swoop”. Now, the enforcement agent must give the tenant written notice at least seven clear days before exercising CRAR. Commercial Rent Arrears Recoverymust be actioned within 12 months of the date of the notice, or if a repayment agreement is reached, which the tenant subsequently breaches, within 12  months of the breach date. This clearly gives some tenants the chance to remove the goods during this seven-day period and frustrate the Landlord’s recovery efforts. In those circumstances, the Court can shorten the period, but they would have to be satisfied that this is a likely risk.

Amount of Outstanding Rent

The Act has introduced a number of conditions relating to the level of arrears, each of which must be satisfied before exercising Commercial Rent Arrears Recovery. The most notable are:

  • You cannot exercise CRAR if the rent arrears are below the minimum amount, set at an amount equal to seven days’ rent. You can use CRAR to recover VAT and interest on rent but do not consider these amounts when calculating the minimum.
  • The tenant must be in arrears of rent equal to or exceeding the minimum level before giving notice of enforcement.
  • When taking control of any goods, the tenant must have been in arrears for at least the seven-day minimum (meaning that the landlord will have to recalculate the level of arrears immediately before the enforcement agent takes control of the goods).

Note the potential for a tenant to pay a proportion of the arrears, following receipt of an enforcement notice, to bring the outstanding amount below the statutory minimum, thereby preventing the landlord from taking control of the tenant’s goods.

Whether tenants utilise this potential and whether this will be a useful enforcement tool, who knows; speculation is that rent deposits will become more important, and their level may increase to balance this.

Contact Laura St-Gallay if you have any queries or wish to discuss wider landlord and tenant matters.

Note: This article is not legal advice; it provides information of general interest about current legal issues.

Stay in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter

Stay in touch

By completing your details and submitting this form you confirm you are happy for us to send you marketing communications and that you agree to our Website Privacy Policy and Legal Notice and to us using Mailchimp to process your data.


Sending

News/Insight

  • Double jeopardy of digital asset inheritance planning amid probate delays
    Hidden digital assets and mounting interest on inheritance tax bills are creating a costly double risk for families dealing with estates following the death of a loved one, as probate delays continue to impact thousands across England and Wales, addi


    Read more
  • Deal or no deal? Keeping negotiations on track
    How to keep commercial deals on track with Heads of Terms, NDAs and exclusivity, improving efficiency, reducing risk and avoiding delays.


    Read more
  • Rights and wrongs: How AI is reshaping Employment Tribunal claims
    AI may be a familiar presence in the workplace, but it’s now starting to appear somewhere less expected: the Employment Tribunal (ET). Grayson Stuckey explores this trend – and what it means for employers.


    Read more
  • Renters’ Rights Act: why process and paperwork matter more than ever for landlords
    The Renters’ Rights Act has now passed into law, marking one of the most significant shifts in the private rented sector in a generation. Most of the new measures will take effect in May 2026, with a national landlord database to follow later in th


    Read more
  • Understanding the Roles of Executors and Trustees
    When making a will, you place significant trust in those appointed to carry out your wishes. Executors and trustees are key roles, often held by the same people, but their responsibilities differ. Understanding these roles and their obligations helps


    Read more

What they say...

  • W Sandover, April 2026
    Boundary Wall dispute “Although (for complex, not relevant) reasons, this matter never reached the point of either negotiations or a court case, Barker Gillette staff provided us with excellent support. I would certainly go back to them in the

  • Client, April 2026
    Excellent suppy “Karen Cole supported me through a difficult time with warmth and professionalism. She made the entire process as smooth as possible, responding quickly to communication and giving clear advice. I would highly recommend Karen to

  • Client, April 2026
    So helpful! “Pippa Marshall listened and offered supportive, practical advice. She was very friendly, easy to talk to and did not pressure me to make any costly decisions during my free 30-minute consultation. I would definitely recommend Pippa

  • Nika Franke-Matthecka, April 2026
    “We had an excellent experience working with Michael Davies and his team on the sale of our property. They were efficient, knowledgeable, and highly diligent throughout the entire process. Communication was always prompt and clear, which made w

  • Paul Woodman, March 2026
    Will writing “Excellent service from start to finish. Efficient and good value. Charlotte was very professional, knowledgeable and understanding.”

Read more
Send this to a friend