Skip to main content

News story

October 1, 2014

Commercial rent arrears recovery from 6 April 2014

On 6 April 2014, the government abolished the common law right known as “distress”, no longer allowing a landlord to seize a tenant’s goods and sell them to recover outstanding rent arrears.

The ancient law of distress has existed since before the Magna Carta, but a new statutory regime known as Commercial Rent Arrears Recovery (“CRAR”) is coming into place. Provided for by the Tribunal Courts and Enforcement Act 2007, the Regulations
(Taking Control of Goods 2013) have only recently come in.

Seizure of a tenant’s goods remains in principle, but Commercial Rent Arrears Recovery has some key changes, potentially affecting its usage and
effectiveness. The key changes are:

  • A requirement for a notice to be served on the tenant before goods are seized;
  • Removing the ability for a landlord to seize goods from mixed-use premises; and
  • Preventing a landlord from taking control of goods if the tenant’s arrears fall below a new minimum level.

In addition, some other important points to note are:

The Lease

Distress only applied to commercial leases. That has not changed. However, CRAR has an additional requirement that the lease has to be in writing, so it cannot be exercised in relation to oral tenancies and nor can it be exercised in relation to licences (whether in writing or not).

The Premises

CRAR applies only to premises let and used solely for commercial purposes. However, a lease will still fall within the scope of CRAR if the residential occupation breaches the lease terms.

Recoverable Rent: the use of distress, historically, was for all sums reserved as rent under the lease. CRAR has significantly limited this, and not all sums regarding service charges, rates, repairs or insurance are recoverable, even if reserved as rent under the lease. However, you can use CRAR to recover VAT and interest due on rent.

Notice of Enforcement

One of the Landlord’s positive features of distress was that there was no requirement to serve notice of the intention to seize goods. Many a Landlord managed to recoup goods in lieu of monies owing to them through a “midnight swoop”. Now, the enforcement agent must give the tenant written notice at least seven clear days before exercising CRAR. Commercial Rent Arrears Recoverymust be actioned within 12 months of the date of the notice, or if a repayment agreement is reached, which the tenant subsequently breaches, within 12  months of the breach date. This clearly gives some tenants the chance to remove the goods during this seven-day period and frustrate the Landlord’s recovery efforts. In those circumstances, the Court can shorten the period, but they would have to be satisfied that this is a likely risk.

Amount of Outstanding Rent

The Act has introduced a number of conditions relating to the level of arrears, each of which must be satisfied before exercising Commercial Rent Arrears Recovery. The most notable are:

  • You cannot exercise CRAR if the rent arrears are below the minimum amount, set at an amount equal to seven days’ rent. You can use CRAR to recover VAT and interest on rent but do not consider these amounts when calculating the minimum.
  • The tenant must be in arrears of rent equal to or exceeding the minimum level before giving notice of enforcement.
  • When taking control of any goods, the tenant must have been in arrears for at least the seven-day minimum (meaning that the landlord will have to recalculate the level of arrears immediately before the enforcement agent takes control of the goods).

Note the potential for a tenant to pay a proportion of the arrears, following receipt of an enforcement notice, to bring the outstanding amount below the statutory minimum, thereby preventing the landlord from taking control of the tenant’s goods.

Whether tenants utilise this potential and whether this will be a useful enforcement tool, who knows; speculation is that rent deposits will become more important, and their level may increase to balance this.

Contact Laura St-Gallay if you have any queries or wish to discuss wider landlord and tenant matters.

Note: This article is not legal advice; it provides information of general interest about current legal issues.

Stay in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter

Stay in touch

By completing your details and submitting this form you confirm you are happy for us to send you marketing communications and that you agree to our Website Privacy Policy and Legal Notice and to us using Mailchimp to process your data.


Sending

News/Insight

  • The Employment Rights Act is a call to action for employers 
    A new year, a new employment framework: what employers need to know about the Employment Rights Act passed by parliament in December 2025.


    Read more
  • Dilapidations explained: What commercial tenants and landlords need to know
    Dilapidations are a common source of dispute at the end of a commercial lease. They can involve significant sums of money and often come as an unwelcome surprise to tenants who believed they had left a property in reasonable condition. Understanding


    Read more
  • The role of due diligence in corporate transactions
    In corporate transactions, due diligence is a key stage that usually follows agreement of Heads of Terms, allowing the Buyer to investigate the target company or its assets before committing to the deal.


    Read more
  • Love in later life and the inheritance tax trap
    Increasingly, lawyers are seeing couples who have chosen to live together rather than marry, sometimes for many years, without fully appreciating how differently the law treats them, particularly when it comes to inheritance tax and financial protect


    Read more
  • Understanding Heads of Terms in corporate transactions
    Heads of terms are a crucial first step in corporate transactions. Learn what they include, why they matter, and how they shape successful deals.


    Read more

What they say...

  • Amish Bristol, January 2026
    Absolutely brilliant, fast, professional, clear and delivered a robust service “Recent mortgage oversight from Ben Marks and Anne was superbly dealt with, and I intend on moving all my business to them. For a big firm, they really do pay attent

  • Client, January 2026
    Excellent experience “The process of my work was quick and effective.”

  • Vicky, January 2026
    Clear, friendly, helpful “Very efficient and helpful with arrangements for my will.”

  • R Cook, December 2025
    Settlement Sorted “Grayson Stuckey was great. Efficient and friendly with all aspects of the support provided. We worked well together and achieved a positive outcome. Recommended.”

  • Ivan Naisbitt, December 2025
    More than just a service “Michael Davies has been representing me for about 35 years, and I cannot recommend him or RIAA Barker Gillette (UK) highly enough. Aside from the normal conveyancing, he is always on hand to advise and guide you throug

Read more
Send this to a friend