Skip to main content

News story

June 1, 2022

Check the ground rules to avoid boundary disputes

Warm weather and longer days see a surge in interest in garden works each year, and where householders improve and replace, boundary disputes are sure to follow.

One recent long-running boundary dispute saw an Essex couple fighting over six inches of disputed land ownership for eleven years, with costs estimated to be as high as £60,000. Philip and Denise New say they have had to re-mortgage their home to cover their costs after losing their case.

The argument started after they replaced rotten fence panels: they say they used the original cement posts that had been there for 50 years, but their neighbours said the fence was in the wrong place and that the News were trespassing on their land.

Mediators and land professionals were called in, but the neighbours could not agree on the disputed land, and the case finally reached the High Court. 

“This was an extreme example, but boundary disputes have a tendency to inflame neighbour relationships.

The best approach is to try and avoid arguments arising in the first place by having a quiet chat with neighbours before you do the work.

If that highlights a difference of opinion that you can’t resolve, then staying civil is essential. You still have to live next door to each other and even if you think a house move may be a solution, remember you have to declare any disputes when you come to sell a property these days.”

Boundary problems often arise because nobody knows who owns and is responsible for a fence, or the location may not be clear from Land Registry records. While modern housing will clearly state who owns which boundary or whether it is a party fence, it is not always clear with older properties. Locating original title deeds or checking with the local authority may help recover old documents, but more work will be needed if no documentary evidence is available. 

One option is to apply to the Land Registry for what is known as a ‘determined boundary‘, obtaining an expert’s report to make your case and submitting with a surveyor’s drawing of the proposed boundary. However, approval is not a guaranteed solution, as the neighbour must still agree with the determined boundary. If they don’t, it would mean going to a tribunal.

Otherwise, an offer of payment for any area of land under dispute in return for setting an agreed boundary may be a solution. 

Another possibility where there is uncertainty over the boundary line would be to fence the area concerned; then, after ten years, an application for formal ownership can be made, claiming ‘adverse possession’. Adverse possession may be an option where the adjoining landowner is unknown or in other situations where no immediate neighbour is involved and actively disputing the boundary.  

Establishing where the boundary is and who is responsible for it does not require the owner to replace a fence, so if you are the one determined on the upgrade, it may be worth considering offering to pay for it. There is no reason why not, even if you are not the one who is responsible, but you will still need to get an agreement from your neighbour first. Discussing what you have in mind also allows you to agree on who is responsible for future maintenance.

Ben added:

“If you really don’t feel able to have an initial conversation, or if you’ve already landed yourself in the middle of a red-hot boundary dispute, then that’s the time to call in a professional to act as an intermediary with your neighbour, rather than pressing on and raising the temperature further. Then, if you reach agreement, you may have to declare the dispute, but you can say it was settled.”

Stay in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter

Stay in touch

By completing your details and submitting this form you confirm you are happy for us to send you marketing communications and that you agree to our Website Privacy Policy and Legal Notice and to us using Mailchimp to process your data.


Sending

News/Insight

  • The do’s and don’ts of using AI in your business
    AI can help businesses improve efficiency and make informed decisions, but it also comes with risks. Explore the key do’s and don’ts of using AI responsibly, including data protection, legal considerations and the importance of human oversight.


    Read more
  • Next equal pay appeal: when can market pressures justify different pay
    When can recruitment and retention pressures justify different pay? Karen Cole explores the Next equal pay appeal, explaining why equal pay risks remain and what employers should consider when reviewing pay packages and the evidence supporting their


    Read more
  • Domestic Abuse Protection Orders: where are they available and what other protection can you seek?
    Domestic Abuse Protection Orders can offer tailored protection, but availability is currently limited. Pippa Marshall explains how they work, who can apply and the other protective orders available, including non-molestation and occupation orders.


    Read more
  • Missing beneficiaries and unknown heirs: what should executors do?
    What should an executor do if someone entitled to inherit cannot be found? James McMullan explains how to trace missing beneficiaries, the limits of statutory notices and the options to consider before distributing an estate.


    Read more
  • Pay transparency in recruitment: Is your business ready to disclose salaries?
    Employers may eventually have to provide salary information much earlier in the recruitment process under proposals being considered by the Government.


    Read more

What they say...

  • Bryan E, September 2026
    Absolutely outstanding “This firm is super professional, efficient and friendly at the same time. You could not wish for a better service. I have used them for my Will and a range of other matters over many years. I’ve found all the vario

  • Jan Norris, September 2026
    Excellent Service “Charlotte Barbaroussis has prepared our wills, LPAs and a discretionary trust. She was professional, kind and patient throughout. A very fine person to have looking after us.”

  • Brian Nunan, August 2026
    “I dealt with the group for many years, and no matter which solicitor I used, the results were always the same. Excellent!”

  • Client, July 2026
    Constructive and empathetic “I contacted Pippa Marshall at RIAA Barker Gillette through a recommendation regarding a family law matter. Pippa was always clear, efficient, empathetic and helpful, offering constructive insights on my situation. I

  • Dino, July 2026
    A lucky professional meeting! “We had an excellent professional experience to recommend to all those who need legal help in the UK.”

Read more
Send this to a friend