Skip to main content

News story

June 1, 2022

Check the ground rules to avoid boundary disputes

Warm weather and longer days see a surge in interest in garden works each year, and where householders improve and replace, boundary disputes are sure to follow.

One recent long-running boundary dispute saw an Essex couple fighting over six inches of disputed land ownership for eleven years, with costs estimated to be as high as £60,000. Philip and Denise New say they have had to re-mortgage their home to cover their costs after losing their case.

The argument started after they replaced rotten fence panels: they say they used the original cement posts that had been there for 50 years, but their neighbours said the fence was in the wrong place and that the News were trespassing on their land.

Mediators and land professionals were called in, but the neighbours could not agree on the disputed land, and the case finally reached the High Court. 

“This was an extreme example, but boundary disputes have a tendency to inflame neighbour relationships.

The best approach is to try and avoid arguments arising in the first place by having a quiet chat with neighbours before you do the work.

If that highlights a difference of opinion that you can’t resolve, then staying civil is essential. You still have to live next door to each other and even if you think a house move may be a solution, remember you have to declare any disputes when you come to sell a property these days.”

Boundary problems often arise because nobody knows who owns and is responsible for a fence, or the location may not be clear from Land Registry records. While modern housing will clearly state who owns which boundary or whether it is a party fence, it is not always clear with older properties. Locating original title deeds or checking with the local authority may help recover old documents, but more work will be needed if no documentary evidence is available. 

One option is to apply to the Land Registry for what is known as a ‘determined boundary‘, obtaining an expert’s report to make your case and submitting with a surveyor’s drawing of the proposed boundary. However, approval is not a guaranteed solution, as the neighbour must still agree with the determined boundary. If they don’t, it would mean going to a tribunal.

Otherwise, an offer of payment for any area of land under dispute in return for setting an agreed boundary may be a solution. 

Another possibility where there is uncertainty over the boundary line would be to fence the area concerned; then, after ten years, an application for formal ownership can be made, claiming ‘adverse possession’. Adverse possession may be an option where the adjoining landowner is unknown or in other situations where no immediate neighbour is involved and actively disputing the boundary.  

Establishing where the boundary is and who is responsible for it does not require the owner to replace a fence, so if you are the one determined on the upgrade, it may be worth considering offering to pay for it. There is no reason why not, even if you are not the one who is responsible, but you will still need to get an agreement from your neighbour first. Discussing what you have in mind also allows you to agree on who is responsible for future maintenance.

Ben added:

“If you really don’t feel able to have an initial conversation, or if you’ve already landed yourself in the middle of a red-hot boundary dispute, then that’s the time to call in a professional to act as an intermediary with your neighbour, rather than pressing on and raising the temperature further. Then, if you reach agreement, you may have to declare the dispute, but you can say it was settled.”

Stay in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter

Stay in touch

By completing your details and submitting this form you confirm you are happy for us to send you marketing communications and that you agree to our Website Privacy Policy and Legal Notice and to us using Mailchimp to process your data.


Sending

News/Insight

  • Transactional documents in a corporate sale: What sellers should know
    Once due diligence is complete and terms are agreed, the focus turns to negotiating the transactional documents that underpin a share or asset sale. This guide explains the purpose of the key documents involved in business acquisitions and why carefu


    Read more
  • Employer warning as immigration raids hit record high 
    Employers are being urged to review their recruitment procedures after new figures revealed that immigration enforcement raids have reached record levels across the UK.


    Read more
  • Planning for the future: What to include in a UK shareholders’ agreement
    A well-drafted agreement sets clear ground rules for how the company is run, how decisions are made, and what happens when circumstances change.


    Read more
  • Understanding Court of Protection applications in England and Wales
    When someone can no longer make decisions for themselves and has not put a Lasting Power of Attorney in place, the Court of Protection can step in. This article explains what the Court of Protection does, when an application may be needed, and what t


    Read more
  • Warranties and indemnities: Key protections in share and asset sales
    An overview of warranties and indemnities in share and asset sales, explaining key differences, common protections, liability limits and risk allocation.


    Read more

What they say...

  • Laura Kelly, February 2026
    Review of legal guidance received “I recently worked with Patrick Simpson on my settlement agreement. Patrick guided me through every stage with exceptional care and diligence. He kept the process moving efficiently, always updating me promptly

  • Prasanna Sooriakumaran, February 2026
    “Really good, especially at dealing with the company that tried to overplay their hand. I highly recommend.”

  • Sharla Munian, February 2026
    Outstanding Legal Support and a Brilliant Result “I cannot recommend RIAA Barker Gillette highly enough. My solicitor supported me throughout a very challenging property litigation matter, and thanks to her expertise, dedication, and strategic

  • Client, February 2026
    Very good service in disagreement with architect “RIAA assisted me in a conflict I had with my architect, who wanted to overcharge me. The end result was satisfactory, with invoices reasonable despite being slightly higher than expected!”

  • Sharla Munian, February 2026
    Outstanding Solicitor Who Delivered the Outcome I Hoped For “After a number of years navigating a complex financial settlement following my separation, my solicitor has been incredible from start to finish. Their professionalism, patience, and

Read more
Send this to a friend