Skip to main content

Insight article

April 19, 2019

Change in divorce law looks set to stop the blame game

No fault divorce is likely to be introduced, but professionals say fair deal on asset sharing means mediation must remain top of the agenda

The news that no-fault divorce is likely to become law has been welcomed. Still, while the legislation waits for its place in the parliamentary calendar, families must continue to deal with one party being ‘blamed’ for the breakup or wait for the change in the law.

And with the parliamentary calendar full of another divorce – the UK’s departure from the EU – no date has been given for debating the proposed changes.

Official statistics show that almost half of divorce petitions between 2016 and 2018 cited behaviour as the reason for ending the marriage rather than the required period of separation. However, while signalling the likely shift to a mutual agreement, the Ministry of Justice announcement sets out plans for a minimum six-month timeframe from making a petition until the final divorce so that couples have time for reflection before securing a divorce.

Professionals have welcomed the potential change in the law, saying it will help couples focus on less acrimonious negotiations when it comes to agreeing on arrangements for the children and/or a suitable financial settlement with each other.

Family lawyer Pippa Marshall said:

“The blame game can further inflame relations that are already strained by a breakdown, so this move is certainly one to be welcomed. Hopefully, it can further support the general shift towards a more conciliatory approach to separation, as there will always be a need for negotiation between couples.

We are dealing with increasingly complex financial and family arrangements, as many couples undertake second and subsequent marriages, often with children from previous relationships. It means that even in the most amicable of divorces, it’s to be expected that each side will wish to secure the best outcome in terms of asset sharing. Eliminating the additional upset of having to apportion blame for the marriage breaking down will probably increase the prospects of couples reaching agreements for their future arrangements.”

Under the existing Matrimonial Causes Act 1973, grounds for divorce require an applicant to prove their partner is at fault through adultery, desertion or unreasonable behaviour. Alternatively, and only if both sides agree, they can agree to wait two years before lodging their divorce petition. If no fault is given, and one party does not consent to the divorce, then the period of separation is extended to living apart for five years.

The proposed changes include:

  • the irretrievable breakdown of a marriage to be the sole ground;
  • the option of a joint application for divorce, alongside retaining the option for one party to initiate the process;
  • removing the ability to contest a divorce;
  • continuing to have a two-stage legal process, known currently as the decree nisi and decree absolute;
  • introducing a minimum timeframe of six months from the date of making the petition until final divorce, with 20 weeks from petition to decree nisi and six weeks from decree nisi to decree absolute.

Pippa Marshall has extensive experience practising family law. Call her today.

Note: This article is not legal advice; it provides information of general interest about current legal issues.

Stay in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter

Stay in touch

By completing your details and submitting this form you confirm you are happy for us to send you marketing communications and that you agree to our Website Privacy Policy and Legal Notice and to us using Mailchimp to process your data.


Sending

News/Insight

  • Converting commercial property into homes: what the latest planning changes mean
    Converting offices and other commercial buildings into homes can create opportunities, but planning rules are only part of the picture. We explain the latest changes and the legal issues property owners, developers and buyers should consider before p


    Read more
  • Closing the AI skills gap
    Learn how SMEs can close the AI skills gap through practical staff training, checking AI outputs, protecting sensitive data and setting clear policies.


    Read more
  • What’s in a letter: Why one small change can spell big trouble for your brand
    Can changing one letter really protect your business name? Peter Moody examines recent trade mark disputes involving FLOWERBX and Vogue, and what businesses can learn about protecting their brands.


    Read more
  • Service charge disputes in mixed-use properties: who is responsible for what?
    Service charges in mixed-use properties can lead to disagreements between landlords, residential leaseholders and commercial tenants. We explore their legal rights, a recent Court of Appeal decision and how disputes can be resolved.


    Read more
  • The do’s and don’ts of using AI in your business
    AI can help businesses improve efficiency and make informed decisions, but it also comes with risks. Explore the key do’s and don’ts of using AI responsibly, including data protection, legal considerations and the importance of human oversight.


    Read more

What they say...

  • Rahul Khanna, October 2026
    Thank you – excellent service “Thank you so much to Qaiser, Vinay and Alex, who were extremely helpful throughout a long-running and complex matter. I really appreciated their clear advice and support.”

  • Client, October 2026
    Feedback “I engaged Karen Cole at RIAA Barker Gillette to support me through a grievance process and help me navigate discussions with my employer. From the outset, Karen provided clear, pragmatic advice and took the time to explain my options,

  • Bryan E, September 2026
    Absolutely outstanding “This firm is super professional, efficient and friendly at the same time. You could not wish for a better service. I have used them for my Will and a range of other matters over many years. I’ve found all the vario

  • Jan Norris, September 2026
    Excellent Service “Charlotte Barbaroussis has prepared our wills, LPAs and a discretionary trust. She was professional, kind and patient throughout. A very fine person to have looking after us.”

  • Brian Nunan, August 2026
    “I dealt with the group for many years, and no matter which solicitor I used, the results were always the same. Excellent!”

Read more
Send this to a friend