Skip to main content

Insight article

November 1, 2017

Brexit Deal: One man’s view

We are sleepwalking into Brexit chaos. Unless a second referendum is held as soon as possible we could be facing a triple whammy of no deal, a general election, and a late realisation that a second referendum is required, all at the same time in early 2019.

David Davis and his colleagues are deluding themselves and deceiving the country when they pretend that they can negotiate a Brexit deal that will be rubber-stamped by Parliament. The important point that we must all understand is that the approval of Parliament, as enshrined in an Act of Parliament, will be necessary to change the law of the land to incorporate ‘the deal’ because any deal necessarily involves changing the law (see the Gina Miller case).

While many in the UK may not appreciate this, one can be certain that EU officials understand it and it is likely to shape a twin EU objective of only agreeing on a deal which is expensive for the UK and which acts as a deterrent to other member countries – with an overarching objective of inducing the UK to reconsider its leave decision.

In some 15 months’ time, to avoid the political humiliation of not having been able to negotiate a deal, the government will put the best deal that is on offer to the House of Commons. It is reasonable to believe it will be unpalatable.

The Labour Party and other ‘remain’ MPs are unlikely to endorse a bad deal. The Government will need to call an election (which it is likely to lose) or hold a late second referendum or both. The country will be in a mess as the clock ticks down to March 2019, when, absent an agreement to postpone the leaving date, it will leave without a deal and with little or inadequate preparation.

To avoid a chaotic outcome a new Government is likely to agree with the EU on an extension of the leaving date to allow for a second referendum. All the Labour Party has to do to win an election is to offer the country a second referendum – it will have wide support.

Remainers may view such an outcome as an acceptable one. But if a ‘stay’ referendum result is delivered towards the end of 2019, the UK will have suffered political and economic turmoil for nearly four years.

This can be avoided or shortened The Government should accept that it needs the House of Commons on its side and is unlikely to get an acceptable deal without a second referendum. The question or box-ticking exercise can be simple such as ticking one of the following:

Should the UK stay in the EU?
Should the UK leave even if it cannot get an acceptable EU deal?

If the majority tick the second box then the EU, the House of Commons and the country at large will understand the strength of the electoral will and we are more likely to get a sensible deal from the EU. Consider how much stronger the negotiating hand of David Davis et al will be. The Government should organise a second referendum immediately.

And if the majority tick the first box we can all get on with our lives without Brexit.

For more information on Brexit and one man’s views, speak to John Gillette.

Note: This article is not legal advice; it provides information of general interest about current legal issues.

Stay in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter

Stay in touch

By completing your details and submitting this form you confirm you are happy for us to send you marketing communications and that you agree to our Website Privacy Policy and Legal Notice and to us using Mailchimp to process your data.


Sending

News/Insight

  • Pension and inheritance tax changes from April 2027: why now is the time to review your will and estate plan
    From 6 April 2027, most unused pension funds and pension death benefits are expected to be included in a person’s estate for inheritance tax purposes. This article explains what the changes could mean for families, pension nominations, wills, chari


    Read more
  • What happens when company owners disagree? The key to keeping private companies running smoothly
    Director and shareholder disagreements can quickly disrupt a business if they are not addressed early. This article explains what disputes can mean for a private company, how they can be avoided, and how legal advice can help protect stability and su


    Read more
  • SMEs urged to review risks as liability rules expand
    New criminal liability rules taking effect on 29 June 2026 will make it easier to prosecute businesses of any size where senior managers commit offences while acting on the organisation’s behalf.


    Read more
  • AI-written grievances add new pressure for employers
    AI is making it easier for employees to produce detailed, formal-looking grievances that refer to legal concepts and workplace rights. For employers, the key is to look beyond the language, identify the core concern and follow a fair, consistent grie


    Read more
  • What to check in a new build contract
    Buying a new build home can be exciting, but the legal process carries important risks. From long-stop dates and mortgage deadlines to specifications, deposits, service charges and warranties, early legal advice can help protect your position before


    Read more

What they say...

  • Client, July 2026
    Pragmatic, but commercially astute support “Genuinely, we valued your pragmatic, but commercially astute support. It has helped us get this tricky deal over the line in a manner that we both feel supports our needs in a balanced way and gives L

  • Chey, July 2026
    Professional and speedy “I’m extremely happy with the service provided by RIAA Barker Gillette. They were very professional, dealt with my matter at speed and were very accommodating with my disability. I wouldn’t hesitate to use th

  • Client, June 2026
    Thank you “I had a call with Pippa that was not only factual and to the point but also reassuring and very helpful. Would highly recommend.”

  • Client, June 2026
    Trusts services “Very helpful service which solved our problem.”

  • Client, June 2026
    Probate Services “We used Patrice Lawrence to deal with our parents’ probate, and she handled the case promptly, professionally and with the respect due for a matter of this nature.”

Read more
Send this to a friend