Skip to main content

News story

December 13, 2018

Brexit and employment law

Whichever side of the Brexit fence you sit on, there is no doubt that Brexit has the potential for far reaching implications for the UK.

Some have advocated that the UK’s involvement in the EU was always a bad marriage, and it could prove to be that Brexit is a bad marriage ending in divorce. Like most divorces, this one could be messy, painful, expensive, and worse still, it’s likely to take years to complete. Time will only tell if this is correct.

Looking specifically at the effect that Brexit will have on employment law, although much of UK employment law is derived from EU law, the UK’s withdrawal from the EU is unlikely to have an immediate impact. When the UK leaves the EU, the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018 will repeal the European Communities Act 1972, and existing EU law will be converted into domestic law.

Most EU Directives are already implemented in the UK by regulations or Acts of Parliament; for example, the EU Working Time Directives are implemented by the Working Time Regulations 1998. It will be for Parliament to decide whether to retain, amend or repeal domestic legislation, and the theory is that they can do this without EU input after EU membership.

Most of the impact of Brexit will be speculative. Commentators have identified the harmonisation of contracts after a TUPE transfer; the calculation of holiday pay; agency workers’ rights; and the introduction of a cap on compensation in discrimination claims as examples of areas currently governed by EU law, where changes could be made in the future by a Government looking to roll back employment regulation.

It is possible that the UK will be required to continue to implement elements of EU legislation as a condition of a negotiated trade deal between the UK and EU.

Many areas of domestic law that are derived from EU law have been heavily influenced by decisions of the European Court of Justice (ECJ), for example, working time, TUPE and discrimination law. Under the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018, UK courts will not be bound by decisions of the ECJ made on or after the exit date. However, ECJ decisions made before that date will continue to bind UK courts in the interpretation of relevant laws and will have the same precedent status as decisions of the Supreme Court.

If there is no negotiated Brexit deal, the Government has identified two areas that will be affected:

  1. employees who work in some EU countries, employed by a UK employer, may not be protected on the insolvency of the employer; and
  2. regulations will be amended so that it will not be possible to make a new request to set up a European Works Council or information and consultation procedure.

Such things are unlikely to be pivotal, and it is therefore hoped that the impact of a no-deal Brexit will not impact employment law to much of an extent.

Speak to employment solicitor Karen Cole to find out more.

Note: This article is not legal advice; it provides information of general interest about current legal issues.

Stay in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter

Stay in touch

By completing your details and submitting this form you confirm you are happy for us to send you marketing communications and that you agree to our Website Privacy Policy and Legal Notice and to us using Mailchimp to process your data.


Sending

News/Insight

  • Pension and inheritance tax changes from April 2027: why now is the time to review your will and estate plan
    From 6 April 2027, most unused pension funds and pension death benefits are expected to be included in a person’s estate for inheritance tax purposes. This article explains what the changes could mean for families, pension nominations, wills, chari


    Read more
  • What happens when company owners disagree? The key to keeping private companies running smoothly
    Director and shareholder disagreements can quickly disrupt a business if they are not addressed early. This article explains what disputes can mean for a private company, how they can be avoided, and how legal advice can help protect stability and su


    Read more
  • SMEs urged to review risks as liability rules expand
    New criminal liability rules taking effect on 29 June 2026 will make it easier to prosecute businesses of any size where senior managers commit offences while acting on the organisation’s behalf.


    Read more
  • AI-written grievances add new pressure for employers
    AI is making it easier for employees to produce detailed, formal-looking grievances that refer to legal concepts and workplace rights. For employers, the key is to look beyond the language, identify the core concern and follow a fair, consistent grie


    Read more
  • What to check in a new build contract
    Buying a new build home can be exciting, but the legal process carries important risks. From long-stop dates and mortgage deadlines to specifications, deposits, service charges and warranties, early legal advice can help protect your position before


    Read more

What they say...

  • Client, July 2026
    Pragmatic, but commercially astute support “Genuinely, we valued your pragmatic, but commercially astute support. It has helped us get this tricky deal over the line in a manner that we both feel supports our needs in a balanced way and gives L

  • Chey, July 2026
    Professional and speedy “I’m extremely happy with the service provided by RIAA Barker Gillette. They were very professional, dealt with my matter at speed and were very accommodating with my disability. I wouldn’t hesitate to use th

  • Client, June 2026
    Thank you “I had a call with Pippa that was not only factual and to the point but also reassuring and very helpful. Would highly recommend.”

  • Client, June 2026
    Trusts services “Very helpful service which solved our problem.”

  • Client, June 2026
    Probate Services “We used Patrice Lawrence to deal with our parents’ probate, and she handled the case promptly, professionally and with the respect due for a matter of this nature.”

Read more
Send this to a friend