Skip to main content

Insight article

April 19, 2019

Change in divorce law looks set to stop the blame game

No fault divorce is likely to be introduced, but professionals say fair deal on asset sharing means mediation must remain top of the agenda

The news that no-fault divorce is likely to become law has been welcomed. Still, while the legislation waits for its place in the parliamentary calendar, families must continue to deal with one party being ‘blamed’ for the breakup or wait for the change in the law.

And with the parliamentary calendar full of another divorce – the UK’s departure from the EU – no date has been given for debating the proposed changes.

Official statistics show that almost half of divorce petitions between 2016 and 2018 cited behaviour as the reason for ending the marriage rather than the required period of separation. However, while signalling the likely shift to a mutual agreement, the Ministry of Justice announcement sets out plans for a minimum six-month timeframe from making a petition until the final divorce so that couples have time for reflection before securing a divorce.

Professionals have welcomed the potential change in the law, saying it will help couples focus on less acrimonious negotiations when it comes to agreeing on arrangements for the children and/or a suitable financial settlement with each other.

Family lawyer Pippa Marshall said:

“The blame game can further inflame relations that are already strained by a breakdown, so this move is certainly one to be welcomed. Hopefully, it can further support the general shift towards a more conciliatory approach to separation, as there will always be a need for negotiation between couples.

We are dealing with increasingly complex financial and family arrangements, as many couples undertake second and subsequent marriages, often with children from previous relationships. It means that even in the most amicable of divorces, it’s to be expected that each side will wish to secure the best outcome in terms of asset sharing. Eliminating the additional upset of having to apportion blame for the marriage breaking down will probably increase the prospects of couples reaching agreements for their future arrangements.”

Under the existing Matrimonial Causes Act 1973, grounds for divorce require an applicant to prove their partner is at fault through adultery, desertion or unreasonable behaviour. Alternatively, and only if both sides agree, they can agree to wait two years before lodging their divorce petition. If no fault is given, and one party does not consent to the divorce, then the period of separation is extended to living apart for five years.

The proposed changes include:

  • the irretrievable breakdown of a marriage to be the sole ground;
  • the option of a joint application for divorce, alongside retaining the option for one party to initiate the process;
  • removing the ability to contest a divorce;
  • continuing to have a two-stage legal process, known currently as the decree nisi and decree absolute;
  • introducing a minimum timeframe of six months from the date of making the petition until final divorce, with 20 weeks from petition to decree nisi and six weeks from decree nisi to decree absolute.

Pippa Marshall has extensive experience practising family law. Call her today.

Note: This article is not legal advice; it provides information of general interest about current legal issues.

Stay in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter

Stay in touch

By completing your details and submitting this form you confirm you are happy for us to send you marketing communications and that you agree to our Website Privacy Policy and Legal Notice and to us using Mailchimp to process your data.


Sending

News/Insight

  • Workplace non-disclosure agreements: What they cover, what they cannot, and what is changing
    Few employment law topics have evolved as quickly in recent years as the non-disclosure agreement, or NDA. Once a quietly drafted provision in a settlement document, the NDA has become a focal point of public debate, parliamentary reform and regulato


    Read more
  • Mitigating risks in business sales and purchases: Is warranty and indemnity insurance essential?
    Understand how warranty and indemnity insurance can help buyers and sellers manage risk, support deal certainty and facilitate smoother M&A transactions.


    Read more
  • Double jeopardy of digital asset inheritance planning amid probate delays
    Hidden digital assets and mounting interest on inheritance tax bills are creating a costly double risk for families dealing with estates following the death of a loved one, as probate delays continue to impact thousands across England and Wales, addi


    Read more
  • Deal or no deal? Keeping negotiations on track
    How to keep commercial deals on track with Heads of Terms, NDAs and exclusivity, improving efficiency, reducing risk and avoiding delays.


    Read more
  • Rights and wrongs: How AI is reshaping Employment Tribunal claims
    AI may be a familiar presence in the workplace, but it’s now starting to appear somewhere less expected: the Employment Tribunal (ET). Grayson Stuckey explores this trend – and what it means for employers.


    Read more

What they say...

  • Client, May 2026
    Inspired confidence “Charlotte was assured and thorough, as well as being friendly and warm.”

  • Client, May 2026
    Charlotte is great “Charlotte Barbaroussis has been efficient, professional and clear at all times.”

  • Linda Grant, April 2026
    LPA Property and Financial Affairs / Health and Welfare Update “This update was carried out in a timely fashion and in detail. Many thanks to Charlotte Barbaroussis.”

  • W Sandover, April 2026
    Boundary Wall dispute “Although (for complex, not relevant) reasons, this matter never reached the point of either negotiations or a court case, Barker Gillette staff provided us with excellent support. I would certainly go back to them in the

  • Client, April 2026
    Excellent suppy “Karen Cole supported me through a difficult time with warmth and professionalism. She made the entire process as smooth as possible, responding quickly to communication and giving clear advice. I would highly recommend Karen to

Read more
Send this to a friend