Skip to main content

Insight article

November 1, 2017

Brexit Deal: One man’s view

We are sleepwalking into Brexit chaos. Unless a second referendum is held as soon as possible we could be facing a triple whammy of no deal, a general election, and a late realisation that a second referendum is required, all at the same time in early 2019.

David Davis and his colleagues are deluding themselves and deceiving the country when they pretend that they can negotiate a Brexit deal that will be rubber-stamped by Parliament. The important point that we must all understand is that the approval of Parliament, as enshrined in an Act of Parliament, will be necessary to change the law of the land to incorporate ‘the deal’ because any deal necessarily involves changing the law (see the Gina Miller case).

While many in the UK may not appreciate this, one can be certain that EU officials understand it and it is likely to shape a twin EU objective of only agreeing on a deal which is expensive for the UK and which acts as a deterrent to other member countries – with an overarching objective of inducing the UK to reconsider its leave decision.

In some 15 months’ time, to avoid the political humiliation of not having been able to negotiate a deal, the government will put the best deal that is on offer to the House of Commons. It is reasonable to believe it will be unpalatable.

The Labour Party and other ‘remain’ MPs are unlikely to endorse a bad deal. The Government will need to call an election (which it is likely to lose) or hold a late second referendum or both. The country will be in a mess as the clock ticks down to March 2019, when, absent an agreement to postpone the leaving date, it will leave without a deal and with little or inadequate preparation.

To avoid a chaotic outcome a new Government is likely to agree with the EU on an extension of the leaving date to allow for a second referendum. All the Labour Party has to do to win an election is to offer the country a second referendum – it will have wide support.

Remainers may view such an outcome as an acceptable one. But if a ‘stay’ referendum result is delivered towards the end of 2019, the UK will have suffered political and economic turmoil for nearly four years.

This can be avoided or shortened The Government should accept that it needs the House of Commons on its side and is unlikely to get an acceptable deal without a second referendum. The question or box-ticking exercise can be simple such as ticking one of the following:

Should the UK stay in the EU?
Should the UK leave even if it cannot get an acceptable EU deal?

If the majority tick the second box then the EU, the House of Commons and the country at large will understand the strength of the electoral will and we are more likely to get a sensible deal from the EU. Consider how much stronger the negotiating hand of David Davis et al will be. The Government should organise a second referendum immediately.

And if the majority tick the first box we can all get on with our lives without Brexit.

For more information on Brexit and one man’s views, speak to John Gillette.

Note: This article is not legal advice; it provides information of general interest about current legal issues.

Stay in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter

Stay in touch

By completing your details and submitting this form you confirm you are happy for us to send you marketing communications and that you agree to our Website Privacy Policy and Legal Notice and to us using Mailchimp to process your data.


Sending

News/Insight

  • The Employment Rights Act is a call to action for employers 
    A new year, a new employment framework: what employers need to know about the Employment Rights Act passed by parliament in December 2025.


    Read more
  • Dilapidations explained: What commercial tenants and landlords need to know
    Dilapidations are a common source of dispute at the end of a commercial lease. They can involve significant sums of money and often come as an unwelcome surprise to tenants who believed they had left a property in reasonable condition. Understanding


    Read more
  • The role of due diligence in corporate transactions
    In corporate transactions, due diligence is a key stage that usually follows agreement of Heads of Terms, allowing the Buyer to investigate the target company or its assets before committing to the deal.


    Read more
  • Love in later life and the inheritance tax trap
    Increasingly, lawyers are seeing couples who have chosen to live together rather than marry, sometimes for many years, without fully appreciating how differently the law treats them, particularly when it comes to inheritance tax and financial protect


    Read more
  • Understanding Heads of Terms in corporate transactions
    Heads of terms are a crucial first step in corporate transactions. Learn what they include, why they matter, and how they shape successful deals.


    Read more

What they say...

  • Amish Bristol, January 2026
    Absolutely brilliant, fast, professional, clear and delivered a robust service “Recent mortgage oversight from Ben Marks and Anne was superbly dealt with, and I intend on moving all my business to them. For a big firm, they really do pay attent

  • Client, January 2026
    Excellent experience “The process of my work was quick and effective.”

  • Vicky, January 2026
    Clear, friendly, helpful “Very efficient and helpful with arrangements for my will.”

  • R Cook, December 2025
    Settlement Sorted “Grayson Stuckey was great. Efficient and friendly with all aspects of the support provided. We worked well together and achieved a positive outcome. Recommended.”

  • Ivan Naisbitt, December 2025
    More than just a service “Michael Davies has been representing me for about 35 years, and I cannot recommend him or RIAA Barker Gillette (UK) highly enough. Aside from the normal conveyancing, he is always on hand to advise and guide you throug

Read more
Send this to a friend