Skip to main content

Insight article

November 1, 2017

Brexit Deal: One man’s view

We are sleepwalking into Brexit chaos. Unless a second referendum is held as soon as possible we could be facing a triple whammy of no deal, a general election, and a late realisation that a second referendum is required, all at the same time in early 2019.

David Davis and his colleagues are deluding themselves and deceiving the country when they pretend that they can negotiate a Brexit deal that will be rubber-stamped by Parliament. The important point that we must all understand is that the approval of Parliament, as enshrined in an Act of Parliament, will be necessary to change the law of the land to incorporate ‘the deal’ because any deal necessarily involves changing the law (see the Gina Miller case).

While many in the UK may not appreciate this, one can be certain that EU officials understand it and it is likely to shape a twin EU objective of only agreeing on a deal which is expensive for the UK and which acts as a deterrent to other member countries – with an overarching objective of inducing the UK to reconsider its leave decision.

In some 15 months’ time, to avoid the political humiliation of not having been able to negotiate a deal, the government will put the best deal that is on offer to the House of Commons. It is reasonable to believe it will be unpalatable.

The Labour Party and other ‘remain’ MPs are unlikely to endorse a bad deal. The Government will need to call an election (which it is likely to lose) or hold a late second referendum or both. The country will be in a mess as the clock ticks down to March 2019, when, absent an agreement to postpone the leaving date, it will leave without a deal and with little or inadequate preparation.

To avoid a chaotic outcome a new Government is likely to agree with the EU on an extension of the leaving date to allow for a second referendum. All the Labour Party has to do to win an election is to offer the country a second referendum – it will have wide support.

Remainers may view such an outcome as an acceptable one. But if a ‘stay’ referendum result is delivered towards the end of 2019, the UK will have suffered political and economic turmoil for nearly four years.

This can be avoided or shortened The Government should accept that it needs the House of Commons on its side and is unlikely to get an acceptable deal without a second referendum. The question or box-ticking exercise can be simple such as ticking one of the following:

Should the UK stay in the EU?
Should the UK leave even if it cannot get an acceptable EU deal?

If the majority tick the second box then the EU, the House of Commons and the country at large will understand the strength of the electoral will and we are more likely to get a sensible deal from the EU. Consider how much stronger the negotiating hand of David Davis et al will be. The Government should organise a second referendum immediately.

And if the majority tick the first box we can all get on with our lives without Brexit.

For more information on Brexit and one man’s views, speak to John Gillette.

Note: This article is not legal advice; it provides information of general interest about current legal issues.

Stay in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter

Stay in touch

By completing your details and submitting this form you confirm you are happy for us to send you marketing communications and that you agree to our Website Privacy Policy and Legal Notice and to us using Mailchimp to process your data.


Sending

News/Insight

  • Workplace non-disclosure agreements: What they cover, what they cannot, and what is changing
    Few employment law topics have evolved as quickly in recent years as the non-disclosure agreement, or NDA. Once a quietly drafted provision in a settlement document, the NDA has become a focal point of public debate, parliamentary reform and regulato


    Read more
  • Mitigating risks in business sales and purchases: Is warranty and indemnity insurance essential?
    Understand how warranty and indemnity insurance can help buyers and sellers manage risk, support deal certainty and facilitate smoother M&A transactions.


    Read more
  • Double jeopardy of digital asset inheritance planning amid probate delays
    Hidden digital assets and mounting interest on inheritance tax bills are creating a costly double risk for families dealing with estates following the death of a loved one, as probate delays continue to impact thousands across England and Wales, addi


    Read more
  • Deal or no deal? Keeping negotiations on track
    How to keep commercial deals on track with Heads of Terms, NDAs and exclusivity, improving efficiency, reducing risk and avoiding delays.


    Read more
  • Rights and wrongs: How AI is reshaping Employment Tribunal claims
    AI may be a familiar presence in the workplace, but it’s now starting to appear somewhere less expected: the Employment Tribunal (ET). Grayson Stuckey explores this trend – and what it means for employers.


    Read more

What they say...

  • Client, May 2026
    Inspired confidence “Charlotte was assured and thorough, as well as being friendly and warm.”

  • Client, May 2026
    Charlotte is great “Charlotte Barbaroussis has been efficient, professional and clear at all times.”

  • Linda Grant, April 2026
    LPA Property and Financial Affairs / Health and Welfare Update “This update was carried out in a timely fashion and in detail. Many thanks to Charlotte Barbaroussis.”

  • W Sandover, April 2026
    Boundary Wall dispute “Although (for complex, not relevant) reasons, this matter never reached the point of either negotiations or a court case, Barker Gillette staff provided us with excellent support. I would certainly go back to them in the

  • Client, April 2026
    Excellent suppy “Karen Cole supported me through a difficult time with warmth and professionalism. She made the entire process as smooth as possible, responding quickly to communication and giving clear advice. I would highly recommend Karen to

Read more
Send this to a friend