Skip to main content

News story

May 30, 2017

Leases and side letters

Time for a rethink?

Landlords can be reluctant to depart from their normal lease terms. Even a small deviation, like agreeing to a monthly rent instead of a quarterly one, may generate concern, and frequently, the instruction is to put the concession in a side letter rather than the Lease. The thought process is often automatic – it’s a concession; therefore, put it in a side letter. Often, the next thought is to make the concession conditional on lease compliance so that the concession can be withdrawn if there is a breach.

This can be the pattern for documenting all sorts of arrangements demanded by Tenants for their bespoke requirements. Landlords’ solicitors tend to populate the middle of a standard concession letter with the special arrangement and make it conditional on compliance. The Landlord closes the deal in the belief that the concession can be terminated if there is any non-compliance, for example, if the rent is not paid on time.

Time for a rethink

Following the recent case of Vivienne Westwood Ltd -v- Conduit Street Development Ltd, the withdrawal of a concession for non-compliance with the lease may not be effective as it may breach the legal rule against penalties. In that case, a side letter concession capped the annual rent at £125,000 and was expressed to be conditional upon compliance with the terms of the lease. A successor landlord purported to withdraw the concession because the Tenant paid its rent late. This new landlord demanded the market rent of £232,500 per annum, backdated to the start of the lease. The Tenant successfully claimed that the withdrawal of the rent concession was a penalty and not lawful.

This new case does not mean that the withdrawal of each and every concession is likely to be shot down. It does mean that landlords should give more thought to the appropriateness of a side letter. Where a side letter is appropriate, greater care should be taken in drafting to reduce the risk of future withdrawal being attacked for being a penalty. Tenants’ solicitors can cite the case in seeking reasonable amendments to the terms of the side letter.

For further advice, please contact commercial real estate partner John Gillette.

Note: This article is not legal advice; it provides information of general interest about current legal issues.

Stay in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter

Stay in touch

By completing your details and submitting this form you confirm you are happy for us to send you marketing communications and that you agree to our Website Privacy Policy and Legal Notice and to us using Mailchimp to process your data.


Sending

News/Insight

  • Dilapidations explained: What commercial tenants and landlords need to know
    Dilapidations are a common source of dispute at the end of a commercial lease. They can involve significant sums of money and often come as an unwelcome surprise to tenants who believed they had left a property in reasonable condition. Understanding


    Read more
  • The role of due diligence in corporate transactions
    In corporate transactions, due diligence is a key stage that usually follows agreement of Heads of Terms, allowing the Buyer to investigate the target company or its assets before committing to the deal.


    Read more
  • Love in later life and the inheritance tax trap
    Increasingly, lawyers are seeing couples who have chosen to live together rather than marry, sometimes for many years, without fully appreciating how differently the law treats them, particularly when it comes to inheritance tax and financial protect


    Read more
  • Understanding Heads of Terms in corporate transactions
    Heads of terms are a crucial first step in corporate transactions. Learn what they include, why they matter, and how they shape successful deals.


    Read more
  • Flexible working requests: A guide for employers and employees
    This guide explains the statutory process for flexible working requests, outlines employer obligations and shares best practices to help navigate requests effectively.  


    Read more

What they say...

  • Amish Bristol, January 2026
    Absolutely brilliant, fast, professional, clear and delivered a robust service “Recent mortgage oversight from Ben Marks and Anne was superbly dealt with, and I intend on moving all my business to them. For a big firm, they really do pay attent

  • Client, January 2026
    Excellent experience “The process of my work was quick and effective.”

  • Vicky, January 2026
    Clear, friendly, helpful “Very efficient and helpful with arrangements for my will.”

  • R Cook, December 2025
    Settlement Sorted “Grayson Stuckey was great. Efficient and friendly with all aspects of the support provided. We worked well together and achieved a positive outcome. Recommended.”

  • Ivan Naisbitt, December 2025
    More than just a service “Michael Davies has been representing me for about 35 years, and I cannot recommend him or RIAA Barker Gillette (UK) highly enough. Aside from the normal conveyancing, he is always on hand to advise and guide you throug

Read more
Send this to a friend