Skip to main content

News story

May 30, 2017

Leases and side letters

Time for a rethink?

Landlords can be reluctant to depart from their normal lease terms. Even a small deviation, like agreeing to a monthly rent instead of a quarterly one, may generate concern, and frequently, the instruction is to put the concession in a side letter rather than the Lease. The thought process is often automatic – it’s a concession; therefore, put it in a side letter. Often, the next thought is to make the concession conditional on lease compliance so that the concession can be withdrawn if there is a breach.

This can be the pattern for documenting all sorts of arrangements demanded by Tenants for their bespoke requirements. Landlords’ solicitors tend to populate the middle of a standard concession letter with the special arrangement and make it conditional on compliance. The Landlord closes the deal in the belief that the concession can be terminated if there is any non-compliance, for example, if the rent is not paid on time.

Time for a rethink

Following the recent case of Vivienne Westwood Ltd -v- Conduit Street Development Ltd, the withdrawal of a concession for non-compliance with the lease may not be effective as it may breach the legal rule against penalties. In that case, a side letter concession capped the annual rent at £125,000 and was expressed to be conditional upon compliance with the terms of the lease. A successor landlord purported to withdraw the concession because the Tenant paid its rent late. This new landlord demanded the market rent of £232,500 per annum, backdated to the start of the lease. The Tenant successfully claimed that the withdrawal of the rent concession was a penalty and not lawful.

This new case does not mean that the withdrawal of each and every concession is likely to be shot down. It does mean that landlords should give more thought to the appropriateness of a side letter. Where a side letter is appropriate, greater care should be taken in drafting to reduce the risk of future withdrawal being attacked for being a penalty. Tenants’ solicitors can cite the case in seeking reasonable amendments to the terms of the side letter.

For further advice, please contact commercial property partner John Gillette.

Note: This article is not legal advice; it provides information of general interest about current legal issues.

Stay in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter

Stay in touch

By completing your details and submitting this form you confirm you are happy for us to send you marketing communications and that you agree to our Website Privacy Policy and Legal Notice and to us using Mailchimp to process your data.


Sending

News/Insight

  • Can you make a WhatsApp will?
    Key legal requirements and future outlook.


    Read more
  • Supporting neurodiverse people in family law matters
    Understanding neurodiversity in the legal context.


    Read more
  • Supreme court ruling on referees’ employment status
    In PGMOL v HMRC, the Supreme Court considered whether professional referees were self-employed. The case has the potential for far-reaching implications across the employment world.


    Read more
  • Business First Magazine
    Read our expert insights on key workplace and corporate issues.


    Read more
  • Why is clear contract drafting important?
    How simple contract clauses can protect your business.


    Read more

What they say...

  • Ian, April 2025
    “Martin and his team at Barker Gillette acted for us in our purchase and sale of property. The chain was lengthy and elements of the work became complex. Martin was tenacious and resolved to answer our queries as they arose. He handled all aspe

  • Henry, April 2025
    “We have purchased flats before with 2 different solicitors who were unable to help us this time. Martin came highly recommended and are we glad. He was very professional in every way: knowledgeable, approachable, he has a friendly manner, very

  • Megan Purcell-Jones, April 2025
    “Charlotte was extremely diligent and thorough. She talked us through the process of making our wills and listened to and understood our needs and the complexities involved. Extremely patient and very clear.”

  • Hena, April 2025
    “Great experience, Patrick was very clear and gave time to explain the legal processes. Friendly and professional communication made me feel comfortable asking questions, received great legal advice.”

  • Michael Constable, April 2025
    “I wanted to revise my will and appoint RIAA Barker Gillette as my Executor and Trustees. This was handled very efficiently and professionally. It helped that I had agreed a fixed fee in advance.” Review left for: Herman Cheung

Read more
Send this to a friend