Skip to main content

Insight article

April 30, 2023

Articles of association and shareholders’ agreements explained

We examine the roles of Articles and shareholders' agreements, their differences, and the reason a business might have both in place.

A company’s articles of association (otherwise known as ‘Articles’) set the governance rules and procedures the company, its directors and shareholders must follow. Articles are mandatory under the Companies Act 2006 – all companies incorporated in England and Wales must have them.

Companies with more than one shareholder often enter into a shareholders’ agreement to establish further constitutional rules. This article examines the roles of Articles and shareholders’ agreements, their differences, and the reasons each business might consider having both in place.

What are Articles?

Articles are constitutional documents of a company which need to be filed and are open to inspection at Companies House. Company law prescribes certain forms for Articles, called “model articles”. A company can amend the model articles to suit its needs.

Articles set out the company’s essential management and administrative structure. They prescribe the rights attaching to its shares (including voting, dividend and capital distribution rights). And they regulate the company’s internal affairs, such as how shares can be issued, transferred or bought back; procedures for board and shareholder meetings; and the powers and duties of directors and how they may be appointed and terminated.

What is a shareholders’ agreement?

A shareholders’ agreement is a contract between a company’s shareholders and, often, the company. Like the Articles, this agreement seeks to regulate the company’s and its shareholders’ conduct by setting out their respective rights and responsibilities, but usually within the broader context of establishing a fair relationship between them and preventing potential shareholder disputes. However, unlike Articles, shareholders’ agreements are not mandatory. Importantly, they are private between their parties and not filed at Companies House.

Typical shareholders’ agreement provisions include:

  • the protection of minority and majority shareholders;
  • dispute resolution mechanisms;
  • the extent to which shareholders may have other business interests besides the company;
  • the decision-making power of shareholders and directors;
  • when it may be compulsory for shareholders to transfer shares; and
  • post-shareholding restrictions for shareholders.

What are the differences between Articles and shareholders’ agreements?

The main difference between shareholders’ agreements and Articles is that while Articles are publicly available at Companies House, shareholders’ agreements are private between the parties, and so their provisions remain confidential.

Shareholders’ agreements apply only to those shareholders who are party to it (original parties or by entering into a deed of adherence). In contrast, the Articles apply to the company and all its shareholders and directors.

Why might a business consider having both Articles and a shareholders’ agreement?

The decision as to whether a company needs a shareholders’ agreement in addition to Articles often hinges on the confidential nature of the rules it wishes to implement and whether any information likely to be included is commercially sensitive.

What if there’s a breach?

A shareholders’ agreement is a contract between shareholders. One party’s breach of its terms enables the other parties to sue the defaulting party for damages. They can also apply to the court for an injunction to prevent or limit a breach.

On the other hand, a breach of the Articles may result in the action or decision made in breach of the Articles being void or invalid.

Shareholders deciding whether to include provisions in Articles or a shareholders’ agreement should therefore consider whether and in what circumstances a claim in damages, or an injunctive relief, is as valuable as the potential remedy of having the breaching action declared void or invalid.

How can we help?

It can be challenging to navigate the requirements of company law and to determine whether it might be appropriate to put more complex governance provisions in place and when.

RIAA Barker Gillette’s experienced corporate and commercial team can help you tackle these issues and advise how best to reflect your goals and intentions in your company’s constitutional documents.

Speak to corporate solicitor Evangelos Kyveris today.

Note: This article is not legal advice; it provides information of general interest about current legal issues.

Stay in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter

Stay in touch

By completing your details and submitting this form you confirm you are happy for us to send you marketing communications and that you agree to our Website Privacy Policy and Legal Notice and to us using Mailchimp to process your data.


Sending

News/Insight

  • Supporting neurodiverse people in family law matters
    Understanding neurodiversity in the legal context.


    Read more
  • Supreme court ruling on referees’ employment status
    In PGMOL v HMRC, the Supreme Court considered whether professional referees were self-employed. The case has the potential for far-reaching implications across the employment world.


    Read more
  • Business First Magazine
    Read our expert insights on key workplace and corporate issues.


    Read more
  • Why is clear contract drafting important?
    How simple contract clauses can protect your business.


    Read more
  • Ensuring equality: A legal guide to responsibilities and compliance
    Understanding equal opportunities in the workplace


    Read more

What they say...

  • Ian, April 2025
    “Martin and his team at Barker Gillette acted for us in our purchase and sale of property. The chain was lengthy and elements of the work became complex. Martin was tenacious and resolved to answer our queries as they arose. He handled all aspe

  • Henry, April 2025
    “We have purchased flats before with 2 different solicitors who were unable to help us this time. Martin came highly recommended and are we glad. He was very professional in every way: knowledgeable, approachable, he has a friendly manner, very

  • Megan Purcell-Jones, April 2025
    “Charlotte was extremely diligent and thorough. She talked us through the process of making our wills and listened to and understood our needs and the complexities involved. Extremely patient and very clear.”

  • Hena, April 2025
    “Great experience, Patrick was very clear and gave time to explain the legal processes. Friendly and professional communication made me feel comfortable asking questions, received great legal advice.”

  • Michael Constable, April 2025
    “I wanted to revise my will and appoint RIAA Barker Gillette as my Executor and Trustees. This was handled very efficiently and professionally. It helped that I had agreed a fixed fee in advance.” Review left for: Herman Cheung

Read more
Send this to a friend