Skip to main content

Insight article

January 16, 2015

What happens when you only receive part of an enforcement debt?

Circumstances can arise where you have a judgment debt and have instructed enforcement officers to seek to pursue the sums due, but in some instances, the debt is only partially recovered.

Receiving part of an enforcement debt can occur in situations where the sale proceeds did not achieve the full amount, an offer for settlement was made and accepted by the creditor, or there is a payment by instalment arrangement agreed upon.

The Taking Control of Goods Regulations 2013 have clarified the situation to work out how the part payment is allocated towards the principal sum and fees.

Where goods have been sold at auction, the funds are allocated as follows:

  • The auctioneer’s fee.
  • The compliance fee (currently £75 plus VAT) to the enforcement officer.
  • Allowable disbursements such as locksmiths, storage fees etc.
  • Balance split pro rata between the judgment debt itself and the enforcement fees.
  • When the debtor and the creditor agree on a settlement sum, the balance is split pro rata between the creditor and the enforcement fees after payment of the compliance fee.

The same applies as above when there is an instalment plan agreed upon. After the compliance fee is paid, split the sum pro rata.

In instances of co-ownership of goods, the co-owner must first receive their share of the proceeds proportionate to their ownership and split the balance as per the rules bulleted above.

If you’ve only received part of an enforcement debt and have a query, contact Laura St-Gallay today.

Note: This article is not legal advice; it provides information of general interest about current legal issues.

Stay in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter

Stay in touch

By completing your details and submitting this form you confirm you are happy for us to send you marketing communications and that you agree to our Website Privacy Policy and Legal Notice and to us using Mailchimp to process your data.


Sending

News/Insight

  • Workplace non-disclosure agreements: What they cover, what they cannot, and what is changing
    Few employment law topics have evolved as quickly in recent years as the non-disclosure agreement, or NDA. Once a quietly drafted provision in a settlement document, the NDA has become a focal point of public debate, parliamentary reform and regulato


    Read more
  • Mitigating risks in business sales and purchases: Is warranty and indemnity insurance essential?
    Understand how warranty and indemnity insurance can help buyers and sellers manage risk, support deal certainty and facilitate smoother M&A transactions.


    Read more
  • Double jeopardy of digital asset inheritance planning amid probate delays
    Hidden digital assets and mounting interest on inheritance tax bills are creating a costly double risk for families dealing with estates following the death of a loved one, as probate delays continue to impact thousands across England and Wales, addi


    Read more
  • Deal or no deal? Keeping negotiations on track
    How to keep commercial deals on track with Heads of Terms, NDAs and exclusivity, improving efficiency, reducing risk and avoiding delays.


    Read more
  • Rights and wrongs: How AI is reshaping Employment Tribunal claims
    AI may be a familiar presence in the workplace, but it’s now starting to appear somewhere less expected: the Employment Tribunal (ET). Grayson Stuckey explores this trend – and what it means for employers.


    Read more

What they say...

  • Client, May 2026
    Inspired confidence “Charlotte was assured and thorough, as well as being friendly and warm.”

  • Client, May 2026
    Charlotte is great “Charlotte Barbaroussis has been efficient, professional and clear at all times.”

  • Linda Grant, April 2026
    LPA Property and Financial Affairs / Health and Welfare Update “This update was carried out in a timely fashion and in detail. Many thanks to Charlotte Barbaroussis.”

  • W Sandover, April 2026
    Boundary Wall dispute “Although (for complex, not relevant) reasons, this matter never reached the point of either negotiations or a court case, Barker Gillette staff provided us with excellent support. I would certainly go back to them in the

  • Client, April 2026
    Excellent suppy “Karen Cole supported me through a difficult time with warmth and professionalism. She made the entire process as smooth as possible, responding quickly to communication and giving clear advice. I would highly recommend Karen to

Read more
Send this to a friend