Skip to main content

Insight article

July 17, 2023

What is the reasonableness test?

The Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977 (UCTA) protects consumers and parties with lesser bargaining power from unfair or unreasonable contractual provisions.

A crucial part of UCTA is the so-called “reasonableness test”, which assesses the fairness and enforceability of specific contract terms.

Which terms does the reasonableness test apply to?

The reasonableness test primarily applies to exclusion and limitation clauses which seek to limit or exclude liability for breach of contract, negligence or other claims. 

The courts may deem such clauses unfair or unenforceable if they fail the reasonableness test. The test considers such factors as the following when evaluating a contractual term:

  1. The relative bargaining power of the parties
    The test considers any power imbalance between the parties to determine whether one party can impose unfair terms on the other.
  2. Knowledge and awareness of the term
    It assesses whether the party affected by the term had sufficient opportunity to understand and appreciate its implications.
  3. Inducements or representations made
    The test considers any inducements, representations, or special circumstances that influenced the inclusion of the term in the contract.
  4. The subject matter of the contract
    The court can assess the term’s reasonableness in light of the nature and purpose of the contract, including the risks and liabilities typically associated with such agreements.
  5. Availability of alternatives
    The test examines whether the party imposing the term offered alternatives, allowed negotiation or if they presented the contract as a “take it or leave it” proposition.
  6. Public interest
    The reasonableness test may consider the public interest or any social or economic implications of the specific term.

The test seeks to balance safeguarding the interests of parties with less bargaining power while still acknowledging the legitimate business interests of all parties involved.

If the courts deem a contractual term unreasonable under UCTA, they may modify the term or declare it unenforceable. this can result in the affected party not being bound by that particular term. They may be entitled to seek remedies or adjustments to the term to align it with reasonableness standards.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the reasonableness test allows parties to challenge unfair or oppressive contractual provisions and promotes fairness in commercial transactions.

Victoria Holland can review your commercial agreements and provide tailored advice based on the specific circumstances of a contract. He can help you navigate the complexities of UCTA. Victoria can ensure you thoroughly understand the reasonableness test and its implications in any given situation. Call him today.

Note: This article is not legal advice; it provides information of general interest about current legal issues.

Stay in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter

Stay in touch

By completing your details and submitting this form you confirm you are happy for us to send you marketing communications and that you agree to our Website Privacy Policy and Legal Notice and to us using Mailchimp to process your data.


Sending

News/Insight

  • Strategic lifetime gifting
    How to minimise your IHT liability during your lifetime.


    Read more
  • Navigating directors’ duties
    Legal responsibilities and risks for UK company directors


    Read more
  • Preparing a business-lasting power of attorney
    In this article, private client solicitor Herman Cheung of West End law firm RIAA Barker Gillette (UK) considers the advantages, needs and practical examples of creating a bu


    Read more
  • Can you make a WhatsApp will?
    Key legal requirements and future outlook.


    Read more
  • Supporting neurodiverse people in family law matters
    Understanding neurodiversity in the legal context.


    Read more

What they say...

  • Michael, May 2025
    “Very pleased with the services provided by Charlotte Barbaroussis. Particularly found her quick and effective to reply to any queries.”

  • Malcolm & Sheila Blackmore, May 2025
    “My wife and I engaged RIAA Barker Gillette to prepare our wills and LPOA’s. James McMullan and Charlotte Barbaroussis were the epitome of professionalism – responding quickly, talking us through the legalese, clearly answering any

  • Ian, April 2025
    “Martin and his team at Barker Gillette acted for us in our purchase and sale of property. The chain was lengthy and elements of the work became complex. Martin was tenacious and resolved to answer our queries as they arose. He handled all aspe

  • Henry, April 2025
    “We have purchased flats before with 2 different solicitors who were unable to help us this time. Martin came highly recommended and are we glad. He was very professional in every way: knowledgeable, approachable, he has a friendly manner, very

  • Megan Purcell-Jones, April 2025
    “Charlotte was extremely diligent and thorough. She talked us through the process of making our wills and listened to and understood our needs and the complexities involved. Extremely patient and very clear.”

Read more
Send this to a friend