Skip to main content

News story

May 20, 2017

Small suppliers to get info on big companies’ payment performance

New regulations designed to help small businesses get paid on time came into force in April, with a requirement for larger companies to publish information about how long they take to pay suppliers.

The requirement affects those companies and limited liability partnerships (LLPs) exceeding the thresholds to qualify as a ‘medium-sized’ company under the Companies Act 2006. The new regulations, therefore, apply to all companies who, at the date of their last two balance sheets, satisfy two or more of the following criteria:

  1. have an annual turnover of £36 million or more;
  2. have a balance sheet total of £18 million or more; or
  3. have an average of 250 or more employees during the year.

From 6 April 2017, those qualifying will be required to publish information on a Government website about their payment practices and policies and how they have performed against them, including the average time taken to pay suppliers. They will also be required to update the information every six months.

The new regulations aim to tackle concerns about the adverse treatment of smaller suppliers by larger, more powerful customers through increased transparency and scrutiny.

The Reporting on Payment Practices and Performance Regulations 2017 came into force as part of the Small Business Enterprise and Employment Act 2015 and applies to public, private and listed companies and LLPs through a separate set of Regulations.

Businesses are not required to report in their first financial year. Those in their second year must check the requirements against their single first financial year.

Reporting is required for parent companies and LLPs if the aggregate group figures exceed the thresholds. Any company or LLP within a group that satisfies the test individually must report separately on its own payment practices and performance.

Our former head of corporate and commercial, Veronica Hartley, explains:

“It’s important that larger businesses check whether they are required to report under the regulations. They must then keep an eye on the thresholds as these will be updated over time. Smaller businesses can ask new customers whether they are required to report and, if they are, check out payment performance as part of their pre-contract checks.”

She added:

“It’s worth remembering that there are other existing measures already available to tackle late payment, including the option of claiming interest and recovery charges. It’s worth checking that existing contract terms don’t undermine those rights with something less advantageous.”

Under the Late Payment of Commercial Debts (Interest) Act 1998, commercial businesses are expected to pay their supplier invoices within 30 days unless they have agreed to a longer time limit of no more than 60 days. Further, all public bodies must pay suppliers within 30 days, except for some specific or devolved activities.

Statutory interest can be applied with a fixed sum of between £40 and £100 (depending on the sum owed) for the cost of recovering the late payment. The interest is currently set at 8% above the Bank of England’s base rate. It starts to run automatically 30 days after either receipt of the supplier’s invoice or the date of receiving or accepting the goods or services (whichever is the later). You can agree to a longer period for payment, but if it’s more than 60 days, it must be fair to both businesses. Unless such a ‘reasonable’ longer period has been agreed upon, purchasers must confirm that goods or services conform with the contract within 30 days.

Late payment legislation does not have to be referenced in trading terms as it will apply automatically in any commercial relationship unless alternative provisions have been set out in the contract.

Call our head of corporate and commercial, Victoria Holland, today.

Note: This is not legal advice. It provides information of general interest about current legal issues.

Stay in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter

Stay in touch

By completing your details and submitting this form you confirm you are happy for us to send you marketing communications and that you agree to our Website Privacy Policy and Legal Notice and to us using Mailchimp to process your data.


Sending

News/Insight

  • Double jeopardy of digital asset inheritance planning amid probate delays
    Hidden digital assets and mounting interest on inheritance tax bills are creating a costly double risk for families dealing with estates following the death of a loved one, as probate delays continue to impact thousands across England and Wales, addi


    Read more
  • Deal or no deal? Keeping negotiations on track
    How to keep commercial deals on track with Heads of Terms, NDAs and exclusivity, improving efficiency, reducing risk and avoiding delays.


    Read more
  • Rights and wrongs: How AI is reshaping Employment Tribunal claims
    AI may be a familiar presence in the workplace, but it’s now starting to appear somewhere less expected: the Employment Tribunal (ET). Grayson Stuckey explores this trend – and what it means for employers.


    Read more
  • Renters’ Rights Act: why process and paperwork matter more than ever for landlords
    The Renters’ Rights Act has now passed into law, marking one of the most significant shifts in the private rented sector in a generation. Most of the new measures will take effect in May 2026, with a national landlord database to follow later in th


    Read more
  • Understanding the Roles of Executors and Trustees
    When making a will, you place significant trust in those appointed to carry out your wishes. Executors and trustees are key roles, often held by the same people, but their responsibilities differ. Understanding these roles and their obligations helps


    Read more

What they say...

  • W Sandover, April 2026
    Boundary Wall dispute “Although (for complex, not relevant) reasons, this matter never reached the point of either negotiations or a court case, Barker Gillette staff provided us with excellent support. I would certainly go back to them in the

  • Client, April 2026
    Excellent suppy “Karen Cole supported me through a difficult time with warmth and professionalism. She made the entire process as smooth as possible, responding quickly to communication and giving clear advice. I would highly recommend Karen to

  • Client, April 2026
    So helpful! “Pippa Marshall listened and offered supportive, practical advice. She was very friendly, easy to talk to and did not pressure me to make any costly decisions during my free 30-minute consultation. I would definitely recommend Pippa

  • Nika Franke-Matthecka, April 2026
    “We had an excellent experience working with Michael Davies and his team on the sale of our property. They were efficient, knowledgeable, and highly diligent throughout the entire process. Communication was always prompt and clear, which made w

  • Paul Woodman, March 2026
    Will writing “Excellent service from start to finish. Efficient and good value. Charlotte was very professional, knowledgeable and understanding.”

Read more
Send this to a friend