Skip to main content

News story

October 11, 2022

Rising living costs can affect your maintenance order

In many cases, the cost of living crisis is likely to affect ongoing maintenance payments. We explore the topic and the solution available.

What is a maintenance order?

The Court can make an order known as a maintenance order whereby one person pays another person periodical payments to support their living costs. Maintenance orders are a legal responsibility usually made following a divorce or separation where the parties are not married but have children. As maintenance orders are Court orders, they must be complied with, and failure to do so could result in penalties against the defaulting party.

The problems

As maintenance orders often cover long periods, they can vary annually to keep pace with inflation, known as index linking. Having a maintenance order which is index-linked usually means that the monthly payments will increase over time in line with inflation. So, when living costs rise, maintenance payments increase so that the receiving party can still pay their outgoings.

Whilst this may be positive for the party receiving the maintenance, you may ask how this will affect the paying party. Many paying parties may find themselves in a situation where living costs have increased, but their wages have not. Despite this, they must pay increased maintenance payments under the court order if it provides for index linking. Increased costs may leave them feeling aggrieved and potentially cause them to fall into financial difficulties.

If the maintenance order is not index-linked, this could cause problems for the receiving party. Maintenance orders are needs-based, i.e., what does the receiving party need to meet their or their children’s outgoings? If living costs increase, it follows that needs will also increase. However, suppose there is no mechanism in the maintenance order for the monthly payments to grow in line with inflation. In that case, the paying party is under no obligation to increase them accordingly. As a result, the receiving party may face financial difficulties in trying to meet the shortfall that will arise from the increased cost of living.

The solution

Luckily, there is a solution to combat rising living costs in both situations. The Court has the power to increase or decrease the payments under a spousal maintenance order. If the circumstances warrant it, the Court can also change the period over which the paying party makes maintenance payments. The Court can also make variations to child maintenance orders during the minority years of the children. Maintenance orders need to be variable as life is unpredictable. It would be unfair for these orders to be rigid and inflexible. Evidence can be put to the Court by either party to support their argument that the maintenance order needs to be varied.

Speak to Pippa Marshall to understand your options and decide whether applying for a variation is your best course of action.

Note: This article is not legal advice; it provides information of general interest about current legal issues.

Stay in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter

Stay in touch

By completing your details and submitting this form you confirm you are happy for us to send you marketing communications and that you agree to our Website Privacy Policy and Legal Notice and to us using Mailchimp to process your data.


Sending

News/Insight

  • Converting commercial property into homes: what the latest planning changes mean
    Converting offices and other commercial buildings into homes can create opportunities, but planning rules are only part of the picture. We explain the latest changes and the legal issues property owners, developers and buyers should consider before p


    Read more
  • Closing the AI skills gap
    Learn how SMEs can close the AI skills gap through practical staff training, checking AI outputs, protecting sensitive data and setting clear policies.


    Read more
  • What’s in a letter: Why one small change can spell big trouble for your brand
    Can changing one letter really protect your business name? Peter Moody examines recent trade mark disputes involving FLOWERBX and Vogue, and what businesses can learn about protecting their brands.


    Read more
  • Service charge disputes in mixed-use properties: who is responsible for what?
    Service charges in mixed-use properties can lead to disagreements between landlords, residential leaseholders and commercial tenants. We explore their legal rights, a recent Court of Appeal decision and how disputes can be resolved.


    Read more
  • The do’s and don’ts of using AI in your business
    AI can help businesses improve efficiency and make informed decisions, but it also comes with risks. Explore the key do’s and don’ts of using AI responsibly, including data protection, legal considerations and the importance of human oversight.


    Read more

What they say...

  • Rahul Khanna, October 2026
    Thank you – excellent service “Thank you so much to Qaiser, Vinay and Alex, who were extremely helpful throughout a long-running and complex matter. I really appreciated their clear advice and support.”

  • Client, October 2026
    Feedback “I engaged Karen Cole at RIAA Barker Gillette to support me through a grievance process and help me navigate discussions with my employer. From the outset, Karen provided clear, pragmatic advice and took the time to explain my options,

  • Bryan E, September 2026
    Absolutely outstanding “This firm is super professional, efficient and friendly at the same time. You could not wish for a better service. I have used them for my Will and a range of other matters over many years. I’ve found all the vario

  • Jan Norris, September 2026
    Excellent Service “Charlotte Barbaroussis has prepared our wills, LPAs and a discretionary trust. She was professional, kind and patient throughout. A very fine person to have looking after us.”

  • Brian Nunan, August 2026
    “I dealt with the group for many years, and no matter which solicitor I used, the results were always the same. Excellent!”

Read more