Skip to main content

News story

March 22, 2016

RICS arbitration service launched

RICS arbitration service for construction and engineering disputes

The obligation placed on parties to consider alternative dispute resolution (ADR) mechanisms is well documented. It’s one of the subjects of our ever-evolving laws. Parties to a dispute (and their lawyers) must actively consider ADR.

ADR ranges from non-binding processes, such as without prejudice roundtable meetings to mediation, to binding processes, such as expert determinations and arbitration. Resorting to the courts is often called “the last tool in the toolbox”.

It is normally prudent for the parties to explore non-binding forms of ADR first as often this is the most cost-effective way to resolve a dispute. Where that is not appropriate, or it has failed, parties should go on to consider binding ADR processes ranging from expert determinations to arbitration.

The Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (RICS) has launched a new arbitration service specifically for construction and engineering disputes.

The RICS arbitration service offers:

  • Fast track arbitration services for disputes under £100,000. The fast track caps a party’s recoverable costs, limits the amount arbitrators can charge and requires the publication of arbitration awards every six months.
  • A select arbitration service intended to provide a “viable alternative” to the Technology and Construction Court for high-value complex disputes publishing awards within 12 months.

The advantage of the RICS arbitration service is that it can achieve a more comprehensive deliberation of the issues rather than the current adjudication process (which can often be cursory in approach). Currently, only the fast track arbitration service rules are available on the website; RICS plan further development in time.

This RICS arbitration service illustrates the ever-evolving methods of ADR promoted by various professions.

Practitioners who do not advise their clients of all of the alternatives available to them could find themselves facing questions, complaints and possible claims from their clients if they have not advised them of cheaper and quicker alternatives to the Court process.

Contact property litigator Laura St-Gallay for more information about the RICS arbitration service.

Note: This article is not legal advice; it provides information of general interest about current legal issues.

Stay in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter

Stay in touch

By completing your details and submitting this form you confirm you are happy for us to send you marketing communications and that you agree to our Website Privacy Policy and Legal Notice and to us using Mailchimp to process your data.


Sending

News/Insight

  • Workplace non-disclosure agreements: What they cover, what they cannot, and what is changing
    Few employment law topics have evolved as quickly in recent years as the non-disclosure agreement, or NDA. Once a quietly drafted provision in a settlement document, the NDA has become a focal point of public debate, parliamentary reform and regulato


    Read more
  • Mitigating risks in business sales and purchases: Is warranty and indemnity insurance essential?
    Understand how warranty and indemnity insurance can help buyers and sellers manage risk, support deal certainty and facilitate smoother M&A transactions.


    Read more
  • Double jeopardy of digital asset inheritance planning amid probate delays
    Hidden digital assets and mounting interest on inheritance tax bills are creating a costly double risk for families dealing with estates following the death of a loved one, as probate delays continue to impact thousands across England and Wales, addi


    Read more
  • Deal or no deal? Keeping negotiations on track
    How to keep commercial deals on track with Heads of Terms, NDAs and exclusivity, improving efficiency, reducing risk and avoiding delays.


    Read more
  • Rights and wrongs: How AI is reshaping Employment Tribunal claims
    AI may be a familiar presence in the workplace, but it’s now starting to appear somewhere less expected: the Employment Tribunal (ET). Grayson Stuckey explores this trend – and what it means for employers.


    Read more

What they say...

  • Client, May 2026
    Inspired confidence “Charlotte was assured and thorough, as well as being friendly and warm.”

  • Client, May 2026
    Charlotte is great “Charlotte Barbaroussis has been efficient, professional and clear at all times.”

  • Linda Grant, April 2026
    LPA Property and Financial Affairs / Health and Welfare Update “This update was carried out in a timely fashion and in detail. Many thanks to Charlotte Barbaroussis.”

  • W Sandover, April 2026
    Boundary Wall dispute “Although (for complex, not relevant) reasons, this matter never reached the point of either negotiations or a court case, Barker Gillette staff provided us with excellent support. I would certainly go back to them in the

  • Client, April 2026
    Excellent suppy “Karen Cole supported me through a difficult time with warmth and professionalism. She made the entire process as smooth as possible, responding quickly to communication and giving clear advice. I would highly recommend Karen to

Read more
Send this to a friend