Skip to main content

News story

March 22, 2016

RICS arbitration service launched

RICS arbitration service for construction and engineering disputes

The obligation placed on parties to consider alternative dispute resolution (ADR) mechanisms is well documented. It’s one of the subjects of our ever-evolving laws. Parties to a dispute (and their lawyers) must actively consider ADR.

ADR ranges from non-binding processes, such as without prejudice roundtable meetings to mediation, to binding processes, such as expert determinations and arbitration. Resorting to the courts is often called “the last tool in the toolbox”.

It is normally prudent for the parties to explore non-binding forms of ADR first as often this is the most cost-effective way to resolve a dispute. Where that is not appropriate, or it has failed, parties should go on to consider binding ADR processes ranging from expert determinations to arbitration.

The Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (RICS) has launched a new arbitration service specifically for construction and engineering disputes.

The RICS arbitration service offers:

  • Fast track arbitration services for disputes under £100,000. The fast track caps a party’s recoverable costs, limits the amount arbitrators can charge and requires the publication of arbitration awards every six months.
  • A select arbitration service intended to provide a “viable alternative” to the Technology and Construction Court for high-value complex disputes publishing awards within 12 months.

The advantage of the RICS arbitration service is that it can achieve a more comprehensive deliberation of the issues rather than the current adjudication process (which can often be cursory in approach). Currently, only the fast track arbitration service rules are available on the website; RICS plan further development in time.

This RICS arbitration service illustrates the ever-evolving methods of ADR promoted by various professions.

Practitioners who do not advise their clients of all of the alternatives available to them could find themselves facing questions, complaints and possible claims from their clients if they have not advised them of cheaper and quicker alternatives to the Court process.

Contact property litigator Laura St-Gallay for more information about the RICS arbitration service.

Note: This article is not legal advice; it provides information of general interest about current legal issues.

Stay in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter

Stay in touch

By completing your details and submitting this form you confirm you are happy for us to send you marketing communications and that you agree to our Website Privacy Policy and Legal Notice and to us using Mailchimp to process your data.


Sending

News/Insight

  • An Introduction to Private Client Law
    Lasting Powers of Attorney


    Read more
  • Understanding financial provisions on divorce
    Divorce can be emotionally challenging, and navigating the financial aspects can add to the challenge.


    Read more
  • Digital divorce: the highs and lows
    According to figures from the Ministry of Justice, digital divorce applications rose by 20% in the year following the introduction of no-fault divorce (2022 to 2023).


    Read more
  • Agile AI Regulation: Moving with the times
    Artificial intelligence (AI) is becoming more prominent everywhere we look in our everyday lives. The critical questions for those trying to make AI safer with regulations are: how broad, how soon and how strict should they be?


    Read more
  • Inheritance disputes on the rise
    Inheritance challenges and disputed wills are soaring, but not just the mega-wealthy are fuelling the action.


    Read more

What they say...

  • Peter W, May 2024
    “Patrick Simpson provided first class support when I experienced redundancy. I couldn’t have asked for more. Demonstrating his superior knowledge and experience and explaining everything to me with crystal clarity. Efficient and timely with a

  • Mr Rose, April 2024
    “The firm acted for me in an employment matter where the issues were as much practical as legal. The advice given was thorough and clear, marrying black letter law to the practicalities. This helped me greatly in achieving a satisfactory outcom

  • Brian Higgins, April 2024
    “Patrick was excellent, responded quickly and gave concise, clear advice. He made the process very straightforward.” Employment

  • J. Cassell, April 2024
    “We were advised by Charlotte Barbaroussis. Her dealings were very professional. She was pleasant easy to deal with and very approachable. Her help during the process of setting up my wife’s and my will made the task a lot easier.”

  • David Delicata, April 2024
    “I dealt with Pippa Marshall for my divorce, who was recommended to me by a friend who worked with Pippa for his complicated divorce. She was very professional and very informative. Pippa took her time to go through every aspect, and I really f

Read more
Send this to a friend