Skip to main content

Insight article

October 17, 2025

Menopause awareness month: Legal protections and what employers need to know

October is Menopause Awareness Month, highlighting the transition and the support available for those affected. While there are currently no menopause-specific employment laws, existing protections apply, and the forthcoming Employment Rights Bill is expected to introduce clearer obligations for employers.

menopause

October is Menopause Awareness Month and is designed to raise awareness about menopause, the transition through it and the support options available for those affected by it.  

Whilst, currently, there are no menopause-specific employment laws, indirect protections do exist; the Employment Rights Bill is likely to offer more explicit recognition and obligations on employers in the not-too-distant future.  

The relevant employment laws protecting those experiencing menopause focus on the Equality Act 2010 (depending on the circumstances, someone experiencing menopause may be able to bring discrimination claims related to age, disability or sex and Trans people with menopause symptoms may be able to bring discrimination claims based on gender reassignment) and the Employment Rights Act 1996 (largely where dismissals have arisen due to misconduct or poor performance and an employee cites menopause symptoms as having a significant impact on them).

There is also protection under the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974, which obliges employers to ensure the health, safety, and welfare of employees as far as reasonably practicable.  That includes assessing workplace risks to health and well-being (e.g. environmental factors such as heat, ventilation, humidity, stressors) that may exacerbate menopausal symptoms and taking steps to mitigate those risks.  

That framework, however, is not ideal.

Equality Act 2010

There is no express “menopause’ protected characteristic under the legislation, and there is no basis therefore for menopause discrimination.  

Menopausal-related claims, therefore, rely on fitting into another protected characteristic. 

  • Sex (gender discrimination) — treating someone less favourably because they are female, or because of stereotyped assumptions about women.  
  • Age discrimination — since menopause is commonly age-related (although not always), differential treatment tied to menopausal symptoms can sometimes be framed as age discrimination.  
  • Disability discrimination — in cases where menopausal symptoms are sufficiently severe, long-term, and impactful, they may meet the threshold of a “disability.” If so, an employer has duties to make reasonable adjustments, and other protections under the Act (such as protection from discrimination arising from disability) may apply.  

The EHRC’s guidance states that symptoms which have “a long-term and substantial impact” on day-to-day activities may qualify as a disability. If menopausal symptoms are classified as a disability, employers must recognise:

  • A duty of the employer to make reasonable adjustments to avoid placing the affected person at a substantial disadvantage.
     
  • Protection from direct or indirect discrimination, harassment, and victimisation connected to those symptoms.  
  • Potential claims for discrimination arising from disability  

Meeting the disability threshold, though, is often a high hurdle, particularly because many menopausal symptoms can be episodic, fluctuating, or variable in severity.

Harassment, indirect discrimination, victimisation

Even where a disability claim cannot be made, there may be claims under:

  • Harassment: e.g. unwelcome comments or “banter” about hot flushes, memory slips, mood swings. If such behaviour is related to a protected characteristic (e.g. sex), it can be unlawful.  
  • Indirect discrimination: a “neutral” workplace rule or policy may disproportionately disadvantage menopausal employees unless the employer can show it is a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim.  
  • Victimisation: if someone is treated adversely for raising complaints or making disclosures about menopause-related treatment.  

Proposals for reform: the Employment Rights Bill – what’s changing

A major change in the employment law landscape is underway thanks to the Employment Rights Bill.  It is currently in its final stages through Parliament; the House of Lords due to sit on 28 October 2025 to consider the Commons’ amendments and/or reasons. The Bill includes proposals directly relevant to menopause and gender equality in the workplace.

The key proposals include:

  • Equality Action Plans for large employers (250+ employees): Employers will be required to publish an “equality action plan” that covers at least two prescribed matters: (i) addressing the gender pay gap, and (ii) supporting employees going through menopause.  
  • Menopause Action Plans: As part of those equality action plans, large employers must set out measures to support employees through menopause.  
  • Implementation timeline:
    • Voluntary adoption begins from April 2026.  
    • Mandatory compliance for large employers comes in 2027.  
  • Other supportive changes: the Bill includes provisions for improving sick pay (e.g. removing waiting days), extending protections, enhanced trade union rights, and more robust harassment prevention regimes.  
  • The fact that menopause is explicitly named in proposed employment legislation is a landmark shift: it moves menopause out of the realm of implicit interpretation into the foreground of equality duties.  
  • Once the regulations are in force, failure by large employers to comply could expose them to enforcement actions or legal challenge.
  • Employers will need to begin preparing data collection, policy drafting, and internal systems well before 2027.
  • The detailed content, format, frequency, and enforcement mechanisms of the action plans will be fleshed out by regulations (which will be subject to consultation).  

Relation to existing rights

  • The new statutory duty (to publish action plans covering menopause) complements rather than replaces existing rights under the Equality Act or health and safety law.
  • If a large employer publishes an action plan but fails to deliver the promised measures, that may increase exposure to claims or reputational risk.

Challenges & gaps

Even with the upcoming reforms, there remain unresolved challenges.

  • High Bar for Disability Claims

Proving that menopausal symptoms qualify as a “disability” (i.e. long-term, substantial adverse effect) is difficult. Many cases will not meet this threshold, especially where symptoms are intermittent or manageable.

Tribunal decisions have recognised mental health effects tied to menopause (e.g. anxiety, depression, stress) in some cases, but outcomes are fact-specific. 

Some Tribunal decisions have rejected the idea that menopause, in itself, is an “impairment,” while leaving open the possibility that related symptoms may count. 

  • Legal Uncertainty & Risk

Because menopause is not yet a clearly defined legal concept in discrimination law, cases may have high uncertainty, and outcomes can depend heavily on facts (severity, documentation, timing). This unpredictability may deter claimants or conservative employer approaches.

  • Lack of “Menopause Leave” or Free Accommodations

There is currently no statutory “menopause leave” in England & Wales. Any paid time off or adjustments related to menopause must be negotiated or accommodated under broader sick leave or flexible working arrangements. 

Employers are not yet legally obliged to offer specific benefits (e.g. rest breaks, cooling areas, fatigue leave) unless tied to a disability duty or incorporated into an action plan.

  • Stigma, Disclosure 

Many employees do not disclose menopause-related difficulties for fear of stigma, ageism, or being perceived as weak. This hinders early accommodations and weakens legal case preparation.

  • Timing Mismatch & Phased Implementation

As the mandatory action plan requirement is not expected before 2027 (for large employers), there is a temporal gap where many employers will operate under the “old” regime, potentially delaying consistent protections.

Smaller employers (with fewer than 250 employees) will not initially be subject to the mandatory duty, creating uneven protection.

Enforcement, compliance incentives, and culture

Even when policies are in place, enforcement and compliance within organisations is uneven. Legal regimes alone may not change culture; training, monitoring, and accountability will be essential.

Regulatory bodies (like EHRC) will need adequate powers and resources to monitor compliance, issue guidance, conduct audits, and sanction non-compliance.

Below are recommendations for key stakeholders in the context of legal preparedness and best practice.

For Employers & HR Teams

  1. Audit existing policies and practices
    • Review absence, flexible working, capability, grievance and health & safety policies through a menopause lens.
    • Identify gaps (e.g. no cooling facilities, rigid break regimes, lack of flexible working options).
  1. Begin voluntary action planning now
    • Large employers may adopt Menopause Action Plans voluntarily to build culture, demonstrate good faith, and reduce later compliance burdens.
    • Create metrics, baseline data (e.g. menopause-related absence, staff feedback), and proposed interventions (e.g. training, environmental adjustments, peer support).
  1. Train managers and line supervisors
    • Provide awareness training (symptoms, communication, adjustments).
    • Encourage empathetic conversations, early disclosure, and flexibility.
  1. Implement reasonable adjustments proactively
    • Where employees disclose symptomatic difficulties, assess possible adjustments (e.g. temperature control, rest breaks, flexible hours, hybrid working).
    • Document the process to show reasonableness and good faith.
  1. Integrate with equality and health & safety strategy
    • Align menopause accommodations with broader equality, diversity & inclusion (EDI) and occupational health strategies.
    • Include menopause considerations in risk assessments (e.g. heat stress, workload, shift patterns).
  1. Record, monitor, and review
    • Maintain anonymised records (with consent) of menopause-related issues (absences, adjustments made, complaints) to monitor trends and refine policy.
    • Use staff surveys or feedback to assess how well measures are working.
  1. Prepare for the impending statutory duty
    • Begin the infrastructure for data gathering, plan drafting, and compliance workflows so that when 2027 arrives, the transition is smoother.

Looking ahead

The legal protections for those experiencing menopause are currently indirect, reliant on broader discrimination, contract, and health & safety laws. While these offer some recourse, a key barrier is the lack of explicit recognition of menopause itself as a workplace legal issue.

The Employment Rights Bill marks a potentially transformative shift by naming menopause in employment law and requiring large employers to publish action plans. If implemented effectively, this could raise the baseline of support, improve accountability, and reduce legal uncertainty.

However, significant challenges remain: proving disability, securing cultural change, filling gaps for smaller employers, ensuring enforcement, and bridging the interim period until mandatory obligations take effect.

During Menopause Awareness Month, employers and employees can work together to increase awareness of symptom support and remove stigma in holding open and candid conversations.  

How RIAA Barker Gillette can help

Our Employment team advises businesses on all aspects of workplace compliance, from discrimination and policy drafting to training and dispute resolution.

If your organisation would like to review its policies or prepare for the Employment Rights Bill, please contact our Employment team to discuss how we can help.

About the author

Karen Cole is a Partner and Head of the Employment team at RIAA Barker Gillette. She has a range of expertise based on her employment law, dispute resolution, and litigation background. Karen provides employment law advice to businesses and individuals, whether contentious or not. She is a member of the Employment Lawyers Association (ELA) and the Association of Regulatory and Disciplinary Lawyers (ARDL).

Stay in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter

Stay in touch

By completing your details and submitting this form you confirm you are happy for us to send you marketing communications and that you agree to our Website Privacy Policy and Legal Notice and to us using Mailchimp to process your data.


Sending

News/Insight

  • Dilapidations explained: What commercial tenants and landlords need to know
    Dilapidations are a common source of dispute at the end of a commercial lease. They can involve significant sums of money and often come as an unwelcome surprise to tenants who believed they had left a property in reasonable condition. Understanding


    Read more
  • The role of due diligence in corporate transactions
    In corporate transactions, due diligence is a key stage that usually follows agreement of Heads of Terms, allowing the Buyer to investigate the target company or its assets before committing to the deal.


    Read more
  • Love in later life and the inheritance tax trap
    Increasingly, lawyers are seeing couples who have chosen to live together rather than marry, sometimes for many years, without fully appreciating how differently the law treats them, particularly when it comes to inheritance tax and financial protect


    Read more
  • Understanding Heads of Terms in corporate transactions
    Heads of terms are a crucial first step in corporate transactions. Learn what they include, why they matter, and how they shape successful deals.


    Read more
  • Flexible working requests: A guide for employers and employees
    This guide explains the statutory process for flexible working requests, outlines employer obligations and shares best practices to help navigate requests effectively.  


    Read more

What they say...

  • Amish Bristol, January 2026
    Absolutely brilliant, fast, professional, clear and delivered a robust service “Recent mortgage oversight from Ben Marks and Anne was superbly dealt with, and I intend on moving all my business to them. For a big firm, they really do pay attent

  • Client, January 2026
    Excellent experience “The process of my work was quick and effective.”

  • Vicky, January 2026
    Clear, friendly, helpful “Very efficient and helpful with arrangements for my will.”

  • R Cook, December 2025
    Settlement Sorted “Grayson Stuckey was great. Efficient and friendly with all aspects of the support provided. We worked well together and achieved a positive outcome. Recommended.”

  • Ivan Naisbitt, December 2025
    More than just a service “Michael Davies has been representing me for about 35 years, and I cannot recommend him or RIAA Barker Gillette (UK) highly enough. Aside from the normal conveyancing, he is always on hand to advise and guide you throug

Read more
Send this to a friend