Skip to main content

News story

October 2, 2025

London expert warns of a ‘trust mis-selling scandal’ costing UK consumers thousands

Families are paying up to £5,000 for misleading asset protection schemes that don’t deliver, and offer false promises of shielding them from care home fees and tax liabilities.

hands over house car and family

Families are paying up to £5,000 for misleading asset protection schemes that don’t deliver, and offer false promises of shielding them from care home fees and tax liabilities.

People across the UK are being misled into paying thousands of pounds for so-called ‘asset protection trusts’, which are often disguised as ‘asset preservation trusts’, ‘family protection trusts’ or ‘flexible trusts’ that promise to shield them from paying for care fees or reduce inheritance tax for their loved ones. However, in reality, such schemes are often misused, offer no real protection and can backfire by triggering unintended legal and tax consequences, exposing families to lasting financial and legal harm. 

James McMullan, Partner and Head of Private Client, is today issuing a stark warning about the growing threat of trust mis-selling, as new research reveals that people in vulnerable circumstances – particularly older homeowners – are being aggressively targeted by unregulated firms selling complex and often worthless schemes.

Often falsely marketed as a way to avoid care fees or reduce inheritance tax, the majority of specialist lawyers surveyed (95%) confirm having encountered cases of trust mis-selling. 

And, in the last year alone, members have noticed an increase, with three in four having advised multiple clients who have been mis-sold these schemes, with nearly three in four (70%) being older homeowners who either own their homes outright, or have significant equity. 

Alarmingly, more than 4 in 5 (82%) say their clients were misled into thinking the trusts would protect their homes or reduce tax, and most victims paid between £3,000 and £5,000 for having complex legal products drawn up, when they didn’t fully understand what they were signing up for, and that offered no legal protection. What’s more, the majority (89%) of these cases involved unregulated providers, with two-thirds of the firms behind the sales operating entirely outside any regulatory oversight.

James warns that the damage caused by these schemes can be deep and long-lasting. Four in five (82%) of lawyers surveyed said the firms selling trusts had appointed themselves as trustees, often without the client’s full knowledge or consent. In parallel, three in four reported clients had suffered financial loss, while a similar number had seen families experience emotional distress or conflict. 

James said: “Families are being sold expensive, complex trusts that promise protection but often deliver the opposite. Instead of security, people are left facing financial loss, stress, and even the risk of losing access to their own homes. There is no one-size-fits-all answer to care planning or inheritance. That’s why it’s vital to seek advice from a properly qualified, regulated professional you can trust, and if you’ve already been caught in one of these schemes, there are ways out; we can help.”

The Association is calling for increased consumer awareness, stronger regulation of unregulated firms, and for more people to seek advice from regulated experts in later-life planning, before agreeing to complex trust arrangements.

About the Author

James McMullan is a Partner and also heads up our Private Client team. James started his career as a family lawyer, but over the years, his practice has grown to encompass all aspects of private client law, including estate planning, Inheritance Tax, lasting powers of attorney, lifetime gifts, living wills, mental capacity issues, probate and contentious probate, trusts and, of course, wills.

James prides himself on spending sufficient time with clients at the outset of a matter to fully understand their position, needs, and objectives. He is committed to resolving disputes effectively, frequently using alternative dispute resolution (ADR). Given its costs and uncertainty, court litigation is a last resort.

Stay in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter

Stay in touch

By completing your details and submitting this form you confirm you are happy for us to send you marketing communications and that you agree to our Website Privacy Policy and Legal Notice and to us using Mailchimp to process your data.


Sending

News/Insight

  • Dilapidations explained: What commercial tenants and landlords need to know
    Dilapidations are a common source of dispute at the end of a commercial lease. They can involve significant sums of money and often come as an unwelcome surprise to tenants who believed they had left a property in reasonable condition. Understanding


    Read more
  • The role of due diligence in corporate transactions
    In corporate transactions, due diligence is a key stage that usually follows agreement of Heads of Terms, allowing the Buyer to investigate the target company or its assets before committing to the deal.


    Read more
  • Love in later life and the inheritance tax trap
    Increasingly, lawyers are seeing couples who have chosen to live together rather than marry, sometimes for many years, without fully appreciating how differently the law treats them, particularly when it comes to inheritance tax and financial protect


    Read more
  • Understanding Heads of Terms in corporate transactions
    Heads of terms are a crucial first step in corporate transactions. Learn what they include, why they matter, and how they shape successful deals.


    Read more
  • Flexible working requests: A guide for employers and employees
    This guide explains the statutory process for flexible working requests, outlines employer obligations and shares best practices to help navigate requests effectively.  


    Read more

What they say...

  • Amish Bristol, January 2026
    Absolutely brilliant, fast, professional, clear and delivered a robust service “Recent mortgage oversight from Ben Marks and Anne was superbly dealt with, and I intend on moving all my business to them. For a big firm, they really do pay attent

  • Client, January 2026
    Excellent experience “The process of my work was quick and effective.”

  • Vicky, January 2026
    Clear, friendly, helpful “Very efficient and helpful with arrangements for my will.”

  • R Cook, December 2025
    Settlement Sorted “Grayson Stuckey was great. Efficient and friendly with all aspects of the support provided. We worked well together and achieved a positive outcome. Recommended.”

  • Ivan Naisbitt, December 2025
    More than just a service “Michael Davies has been representing me for about 35 years, and I cannot recommend him or RIAA Barker Gillette (UK) highly enough. Aside from the normal conveyancing, he is always on hand to advise and guide you throug

Read more
Send this to a friend