Skip to main content

News story

October 2, 2025

London expert warns of a ‘trust mis-selling scandal’ costing UK consumers thousands

Families are paying up to £5,000 for misleading asset protection schemes that don’t deliver, and offer false promises of shielding them from care home fees and tax liabilities.

hands over house car and family

Families are paying up to £5,000 for misleading asset protection schemes that don’t deliver, and offer false promises of shielding them from care home fees and tax liabilities.

People across the UK are being misled into paying thousands of pounds for so-called ‘asset protection trusts’, which are often disguised as ‘asset preservation trusts’, ‘family protection trusts’ or ‘flexible trusts’ that promise to shield them from paying for care fees or reduce inheritance tax for their loved ones. However, in reality, such schemes are often misused, offer no real protection and can backfire by triggering unintended legal and tax consequences, exposing families to lasting financial and legal harm. 

James McMullan, Partner and Head of Private Client, is today issuing a stark warning about the growing threat of trust mis-selling, as new research reveals that people in vulnerable circumstances – particularly older homeowners – are being aggressively targeted by unregulated firms selling complex and often worthless schemes.

Often falsely marketed as a way to avoid care fees or reduce inheritance tax, the majority of specialist lawyers surveyed (95%) confirm having encountered cases of trust mis-selling. 

And, in the last year alone, members have noticed an increase, with three in four having advised multiple clients who have been mis-sold these schemes, with nearly three in four (70%) being older homeowners who either own their homes outright, or have significant equity. 

Alarmingly, more than 4 in 5 (82%) say their clients were misled into thinking the trusts would protect their homes or reduce tax, and most victims paid between £3,000 and £5,000 for having complex legal products drawn up, when they didn’t fully understand what they were signing up for, and that offered no legal protection. What’s more, the majority (89%) of these cases involved unregulated providers, with two-thirds of the firms behind the sales operating entirely outside any regulatory oversight.

James warns that the damage caused by these schemes can be deep and long-lasting. Four in five (82%) of lawyers surveyed said the firms selling trusts had appointed themselves as trustees, often without the client’s full knowledge or consent. In parallel, three in four reported clients had suffered financial loss, while a similar number had seen families experience emotional distress or conflict. 

James said: “Families are being sold expensive, complex trusts that promise protection but often deliver the opposite. Instead of security, people are left facing financial loss, stress, and even the risk of losing access to their own homes. There is no one-size-fits-all answer to care planning or inheritance. That’s why it’s vital to seek advice from a properly qualified, regulated professional you can trust, and if you’ve already been caught in one of these schemes, there are ways out; we can help.”

The Association is calling for increased consumer awareness, stronger regulation of unregulated firms, and for more people to seek advice from regulated experts in later-life planning, before agreeing to complex trust arrangements.

About the Author

James McMullan is a Partner and also heads up our Private Client team. James started his career as a family lawyer, but over the years, his practice has grown to encompass all aspects of private client law, including estate planning, Inheritance Tax, lasting powers of attorney, lifetime gifts, living wills, mental capacity issues, probate and contentious probate, trusts and, of course, wills.

James prides himself on spending sufficient time with clients at the outset of a matter to fully understand their position, needs, and objectives. He is committed to resolving disputes effectively, frequently using alternative dispute resolution (ADR). Given its costs and uncertainty, court litigation is a last resort.

Stay in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter

Stay in touch

By completing your details and submitting this form you confirm you are happy for us to send you marketing communications and that you agree to our Website Privacy Policy and Legal Notice and to us using Mailchimp to process your data.


Sending

News/Insight

  • Transactional documents in a corporate sale: What sellers should know
    Once due diligence is complete and terms are agreed, the focus turns to negotiating the transactional documents that underpin a share or asset sale. This guide explains the purpose of the key documents involved in business acquisitions and why carefu


    Read more
  • Employer warning as immigration raids hit record high 
    Employers are being urged to review their recruitment procedures after new figures revealed that immigration enforcement raids have reached record levels across the UK.


    Read more
  • Planning for the future: What to include in a UK shareholders’ agreement
    A well-drafted agreement sets clear ground rules for how the company is run, how decisions are made, and what happens when circumstances change.


    Read more
  • Understanding Court of Protection applications in England and Wales
    When someone can no longer make decisions for themselves and has not put a Lasting Power of Attorney in place, the Court of Protection can step in. This article explains what the Court of Protection does, when an application may be needed, and what t


    Read more
  • Warranties and indemnities: Key protections in share and asset sales
    An overview of warranties and indemnities in share and asset sales, explaining key differences, common protections, liability limits and risk allocation.


    Read more

What they say...

  • Laura Kelly, February 2026
    Review of legal guidance received “I recently worked with Patrick Simpson on my settlement agreement. Patrick guided me through every stage with exceptional care and diligence. He kept the process moving efficiently, always updating me promptly

  • Prasanna Sooriakumaran, February 2026
    “Really good, especially at dealing with the company that tried to overplay their hand. I highly recommend.”

  • Sharla Munian, February 2026
    Outstanding Legal Support and a Brilliant Result “I cannot recommend RIAA Barker Gillette highly enough. My solicitor supported me throughout a very challenging property litigation matter, and thanks to her expertise, dedication, and strategic

  • Client, February 2026
    Very good service in disagreement with architect “RIAA assisted me in a conflict I had with my architect, who wanted to overcharge me. The end result was satisfactory, with invoices reasonable despite being slightly higher than expected!”

  • Sharla Munian, February 2026
    Outstanding Solicitor Who Delivered the Outcome I Hoped For “After a number of years navigating a complex financial settlement following my separation, my solicitor has been incredible from start to finish. Their professionalism, patience, and

Read more
Send this to a friend