Skip to main content

Insight article

June 28, 2019

Can I fire someone with less than two years of service?

Generally, employees can only claim unfair dismissal against an employer if they have a minimum of two years’ service.

This is not, however, a green light to dismiss someone with less than two years’ service, as there are other employment law issues to consider. However, as an employer, it gives you some flexibility in managing and dismissing staff with less than two years of service under their belt.

When a new employee starts, keep an eye out for any concerns you might have and note their start date. If dissatisfied, it’s easier to dismiss someone in their first two years of employment, subject to some of the caveats below.

Know the risks

In some cases, there is no qualifying period of employment (i.e. length of service), for example, the ‘automatically unfair’ reasons for dismissal. If you’ve not heard of these before, read our article “What are the automatically unfair reasons for dismissal?”. Another area is discrimination. Employment law recognises nine types of discrimination:

  • age
  • disability
  • gender reassignment
  • marriage and civil partnership
  • pregnancy and maternity
  • race
  • religion or belief
  • sex
  • sexual orientation

Before dismissing an employee with less than two years of service, you should check that there is no discriminatory aspect to the decision.

You should also be aware that there is only a one-month qualifying period for an employee who is dismissed in circumstances where they should have been suspended on medical grounds.

Further, it is important to check whether any company policies or procedures are contractually binding. If so, you must ensure capability and disciplinary procedures are followed.

Ideally a company’s policies and procedures should not form part of an employment contract, as this enables change without consultation.”

Irrespective of unfair dismissal claims, employees can claim wrongful dismissal for breach of contract if an employer does not provide the correct notice period or does not make a payment in lieu of notice. If this is the case, fairness is not even an issue. The sole question to be answered is whether the contract has been breached.

Lastly, don’t forget employees are entitled to be paid for any accrued holiday not taken at the termination date.

What to do – as a minimum!

Meet with the employee in question and outline any concerns you may have. Take notes at that meeting. Notes are important because they record what was discussed and are useful if issues arise further down the line. You may give the employee a short period to improve, for instance, if the issue is performance related. If you remain unhappy after this period, the option to dismiss can be pursued quickly and efficiently.

Dismissals close to two years of service

Employers should always seek legal advice when considering dismissing an employee with close to two years of service. It is important to bear in mind statutory and contractual notice periods even when you’re dismissing without paying notice.

“An employee whose termination date is the day before the second anniversary of their start date, will have two years of service and qualify for an unfair dismissal claim.”

Best practice

Employers should follow the ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedure. If the employer has unreasonably failed to follow the code, they risk facing a 25% uplift on any compensation. Therefore, a dismissal without notice may be met with an unlawful deduction from wages claim or breach of contract, along with an uplift, and a capability termination may be met with a discrimination claim, also with the risk of an uplift.

Employers following the code add robustness to any claim on an evidential basis.

If you’re unsure of how to get rid of an employee, speak to Karen Cole today.

Note: This is not legal advice; it provides information of general interest about current legal issues.

Stay in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter

Stay in touch

By completing your details and submitting this form you confirm you are happy for us to send you marketing communications and that you agree to our Website Privacy Policy and Legal Notice and to us using Mailchimp to process your data.


Sending

News/Insight

  • Pension and inheritance tax changes from April 2027: why now is the time to review your will and estate plan
    From 6 April 2027, most unused pension funds and pension death benefits are expected to be included in a person’s estate for inheritance tax purposes. This article explains what the changes could mean for families, pension nominations, wills, chari


    Read more
  • What happens when company owners disagree? The key to keeping private companies running smoothly
    Director and shareholder disagreements can quickly disrupt a business if they are not addressed early. This article explains what disputes can mean for a private company, how they can be avoided, and how legal advice can help protect stability and su


    Read more
  • SMEs urged to review risks as liability rules expand
    New criminal liability rules taking effect on 29 June 2026 will make it easier to prosecute businesses of any size where senior managers commit offences while acting on the organisation’s behalf.


    Read more
  • AI-written grievances add new pressure for employers
    AI is making it easier for employees to produce detailed, formal-looking grievances that refer to legal concepts and workplace rights. For employers, the key is to look beyond the language, identify the core concern and follow a fair, consistent grie


    Read more
  • What to check in a new build contract
    Buying a new build home can be exciting, but the legal process carries important risks. From long-stop dates and mortgage deadlines to specifications, deposits, service charges and warranties, early legal advice can help protect your position before


    Read more

What they say...

  • Client, July 2026
    Pragmatic, but commercially astute support “Genuinely, we valued your pragmatic, but commercially astute support. It has helped us get this tricky deal over the line in a manner that we both feel supports our needs in a balanced way and gives L

  • Chey, July 2026
    Professional and speedy “I’m extremely happy with the service provided by RIAA Barker Gillette. They were very professional, dealt with my matter at speed and were very accommodating with my disability. I wouldn’t hesitate to use th

  • Client, June 2026
    Thank you “I had a call with Pippa that was not only factual and to the point but also reassuring and very helpful. Would highly recommend.”

  • Client, June 2026
    Trusts services “Very helpful service which solved our problem.”

  • Client, June 2026
    Probate Services “We used Patrice Lawrence to deal with our parents’ probate, and she handled the case promptly, professionally and with the respect due for a matter of this nature.”

Read more
Send this to a friend