Skip to main content

News story

May 30, 2017

Leases and side letters

Time for a rethink?

Landlords can be reluctant to depart from their normal lease terms. Even a small deviation, like agreeing to a monthly rent instead of a quarterly one, may generate concern, and frequently, the instruction is to put the concession in a side letter rather than the Lease. The thought process is often automatic – it’s a concession; therefore, put it in a side letter. Often, the next thought is to make the concession conditional on lease compliance so that the concession can be withdrawn if there is a breach.

This can be the pattern for documenting all sorts of arrangements demanded by Tenants for their bespoke requirements. Landlords’ solicitors tend to populate the middle of a standard concession letter with the special arrangement and make it conditional on compliance. The Landlord closes the deal in the belief that the concession can be terminated if there is any non-compliance, for example, if the rent is not paid on time.

Time for a rethink

Following the recent case of Vivienne Westwood Ltd -v- Conduit Street Development Ltd, the withdrawal of a concession for non-compliance with the lease may not be effective as it may breach the legal rule against penalties. In that case, a side letter concession capped the annual rent at £125,000 and was expressed to be conditional upon compliance with the terms of the lease. A successor landlord purported to withdraw the concession because the Tenant paid its rent late. This new landlord demanded the market rent of £232,500 per annum, backdated to the start of the lease. The Tenant successfully claimed that the withdrawal of the rent concession was a penalty and not lawful.

This new case does not mean that the withdrawal of each and every concession is likely to be shot down. It does mean that landlords should give more thought to the appropriateness of a side letter. Where a side letter is appropriate, greater care should be taken in drafting to reduce the risk of future withdrawal being attacked for being a penalty. Tenants’ solicitors can cite the case in seeking reasonable amendments to the terms of the side letter.

For further advice, please contact commercial real estate partner John Gillette.

Note: This article is not legal advice; it provides information of general interest about current legal issues.

Stay in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter

Stay in touch

By completing your details and submitting this form you confirm you are happy for us to send you marketing communications and that you agree to our Website Privacy Policy and Legal Notice and to us using Mailchimp to process your data.


Sending

News/Insight

  • Workplace non-disclosure agreements: What they cover, what they cannot, and what is changing
    Few employment law topics have evolved as quickly in recent years as the non-disclosure agreement, or NDA. Once a quietly drafted provision in a settlement document, the NDA has become a focal point of public debate, parliamentary reform and regulato


    Read more
  • Mitigating risks in business sales and purchases: Is warranty and indemnity insurance essential?
    Understand how warranty and indemnity insurance can help buyers and sellers manage risk, support deal certainty and facilitate smoother M&A transactions.


    Read more
  • Double jeopardy of digital asset inheritance planning amid probate delays
    Hidden digital assets and mounting interest on inheritance tax bills are creating a costly double risk for families dealing with estates following the death of a loved one, as probate delays continue to impact thousands across England and Wales, addi


    Read more
  • Deal or no deal? Keeping negotiations on track
    How to keep commercial deals on track with Heads of Terms, NDAs and exclusivity, improving efficiency, reducing risk and avoiding delays.


    Read more
  • Rights and wrongs: How AI is reshaping Employment Tribunal claims
    AI may be a familiar presence in the workplace, but it’s now starting to appear somewhere less expected: the Employment Tribunal (ET). Grayson Stuckey explores this trend – and what it means for employers.


    Read more

What they say...

  • Client, May 2026
    Inspired confidence “Charlotte was assured and thorough, as well as being friendly and warm.”

  • Client, May 2026
    Charlotte is great “Charlotte Barbaroussis has been efficient, professional and clear at all times.”

  • Linda Grant, April 2026
    LPA Property and Financial Affairs / Health and Welfare Update “This update was carried out in a timely fashion and in detail. Many thanks to Charlotte Barbaroussis.”

  • W Sandover, April 2026
    Boundary Wall dispute “Although (for complex, not relevant) reasons, this matter never reached the point of either negotiations or a court case, Barker Gillette staff provided us with excellent support. I would certainly go back to them in the

  • Client, April 2026
    Excellent suppy “Karen Cole supported me through a difficult time with warmth and professionalism. She made the entire process as smooth as possible, responding quickly to communication and giving clear advice. I would highly recommend Karen to

Read more
Send this to a friend