Skip to main content

News story

May 30, 2017

Leases and side letters

Time for a rethink?

Landlords can be reluctant to depart from their normal lease terms. Even a small deviation, like agreeing to a monthly rent instead of a quarterly one, may generate concern, and frequently, the instruction is to put the concession in a side letter rather than the Lease. The thought process is often automatic – it’s a concession; therefore, put it in a side letter. Often, the next thought is to make the concession conditional on lease compliance so that the concession can be withdrawn if there is a breach.

This can be the pattern for documenting all sorts of arrangements demanded by Tenants for their bespoke requirements. Landlords’ solicitors tend to populate the middle of a standard concession letter with the special arrangement and make it conditional on compliance. The Landlord closes the deal in the belief that the concession can be terminated if there is any non-compliance, for example, if the rent is not paid on time.

Time for a rethink

Following the recent case of Vivienne Westwood Ltd -v- Conduit Street Development Ltd, the withdrawal of a concession for non-compliance with the lease may not be effective as it may breach the legal rule against penalties. In that case, a side letter concession capped the annual rent at £125,000 and was expressed to be conditional upon compliance with the terms of the lease. A successor landlord purported to withdraw the concession because the Tenant paid its rent late. This new landlord demanded the market rent of £232,500 per annum, backdated to the start of the lease. The Tenant successfully claimed that the withdrawal of the rent concession was a penalty and not lawful.

This new case does not mean that the withdrawal of each and every concession is likely to be shot down. It does mean that landlords should give more thought to the appropriateness of a side letter. Where a side letter is appropriate, greater care should be taken in drafting to reduce the risk of future withdrawal being attacked for being a penalty. Tenants’ solicitors can cite the case in seeking reasonable amendments to the terms of the side letter.

For further advice, please contact commercial real estate partner John Gillette.

Note: This article is not legal advice; it provides information of general interest about current legal issues.

Stay in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter

Stay in touch

By completing your details and submitting this form you confirm you are happy for us to send you marketing communications and that you agree to our Website Privacy Policy and Legal Notice and to us using Mailchimp to process your data.


Sending

News/Insight

  • Converting commercial property into homes: what the latest planning changes mean
    Converting offices and other commercial buildings into homes can create opportunities, but planning rules are only part of the picture. We explain the latest changes and the legal issues property owners, developers and buyers should consider before p


    Read more
  • Closing the AI skills gap
    Learn how SMEs can close the AI skills gap through practical staff training, checking AI outputs, protecting sensitive data and setting clear policies.


    Read more
  • What’s in a letter: Why one small change can spell big trouble for your brand
    Can changing one letter really protect your business name? Peter Moody examines recent trade mark disputes involving FLOWERBX and Vogue, and what businesses can learn about protecting their brands.


    Read more
  • Service charge disputes in mixed-use properties: who is responsible for what?
    Service charges in mixed-use properties can lead to disagreements between landlords, residential leaseholders and commercial tenants. We explore their legal rights, a recent Court of Appeal decision and how disputes can be resolved.


    Read more
  • The do’s and don’ts of using AI in your business
    AI can help businesses improve efficiency and make informed decisions, but it also comes with risks. Explore the key do’s and don’ts of using AI responsibly, including data protection, legal considerations and the importance of human oversight.


    Read more

What they say...

  • Rahul Khanna, October 2026
    Thank you – excellent service “Thank you so much to Qaiser, Vinay and Alex, who were extremely helpful throughout a long-running and complex matter. I really appreciated their clear advice and support.”

  • Client, October 2026
    Feedback “I engaged Karen Cole at RIAA Barker Gillette to support me through a grievance process and help me navigate discussions with my employer. From the outset, Karen provided clear, pragmatic advice and took the time to explain my options,

  • Bryan E, September 2026
    Absolutely outstanding “This firm is super professional, efficient and friendly at the same time. You could not wish for a better service. I have used them for my Will and a range of other matters over many years. I’ve found all the vario

  • Jan Norris, September 2026
    Excellent Service “Charlotte Barbaroussis has prepared our wills, LPAs and a discretionary trust. She was professional, kind and patient throughout. A very fine person to have looking after us.”

  • Brian Nunan, August 2026
    “I dealt with the group for many years, and no matter which solicitor I used, the results were always the same. Excellent!”

Read more
Send this to a friend