Skip to main content

Insight article

June 15, 2017

Hope for the best, prepare for the worst

While pre-nuptial agreements are becoming more and more popular, many still see them as cynical and unromantic. After all, why would you want to marry someone if you thought you might break up with them? However, it may be worth thinking of a pre-nuptial agreement as an “insurance policy” rather than a “break-up agreement”.

While pre-nuptial agreements are becoming more and more popular, many still see them as cynical and unromantic. After all, why would you want to marry someone if you thought you might break up with them? However, it may be worth thinking of a pre-nuptial agreement as an “insurance policy” rather than a “break-up agreement”.

What do they do?

Ensure Stability

  • The fact is that people are getting married at a later stage in their life. By this time, they are financially stable and will have a few assets under their name – the flat they saved up for, the property they inherited or the shares that have been slowly gaining value since the recession. It makes sense to put in place an “insurance policy” to protect your assets.
  • It is not just the financially stable that benefit from entering such an “insurance policy”. The agreement may contain provisions in which the weaker party (financially speaking) is entitled to a lump sum, a right of residency or even maintenance for a specific period following the break-up of the relationship.

Give weight to your agreement

Although pre-nuptial agreements are not legally binding, in 2010, the Supreme Court set out a test (Radmacher v Granatino) that Courts should follow to determine how much weight should be given to such an agreement.

  • Firstly, the Court must ensure that the parties were open and honest in disclosing all their pre-marital assets and debts – if you fail to mention a pre-marital asset that is later discovered, nothing gets protected.
  • Secondly, the Court will check that both parties knew what they were signing – both parties will need to seek and obtain independent legal advice.
  • Thirdly, the Court will check that one party did not coerce the other party into signing the agreement – so you cannot surprise your partner with a pre-nuptial agreement at the altar. It is preferable that an agreement is signed at least one month before the wedding.
  • Finally, the agreement cannot prejudice either party’s position as of the date of the divorce. Generally, the longer the marriage lasts, the less weight the pre-nuptial agreement will carry in the eyes of the court. This is because the parties may have gained, lost or even merged their debts and assets. Furthermore, healthcare needs may have changed, or there may be a child to take into consideration as at the date of the divorce.

In 2010, the Office for National Statistics revealed that 42% of marriages in England and Wales ended in divorce. Can you guarantee that you’ll make the 58% that doesn’t?

Even if you have been married for some time it may be worth reviewing and updating your agreement if you have already made one. However, if you have not yet made one you may want to consider entering a post nuptial agreement.

Contact Pippa Marshall today for more advice and information.

Note: This is not legal advice; it provides information of general interest about current legal issues.

Stay in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter

Stay in touch

By completing your details and submitting this form you confirm you are happy for us to send you marketing communications and that you agree to our Website Privacy Policy and Legal Notice and to us using Mailchimp to process your data.


Sending

News/Insight

  • Can you make a WhatsApp will?
    Key legal requirements and future outlook.


    Read more
  • Supporting neurodiverse people in family law matters
    Understanding neurodiversity in the legal context.


    Read more
  • Supreme court ruling on referees’ employment status
    In PGMOL v HMRC, the Supreme Court considered whether professional referees were self-employed. The case has the potential for far-reaching implications across the employment world.


    Read more
  • Business First Magazine
    Read our expert insights on key workplace and corporate issues.


    Read more
  • Why is clear contract drafting important?
    How simple contract clauses can protect your business.


    Read more

What they say...

  • Ian, April 2025
    “Martin and his team at Barker Gillette acted for us in our purchase and sale of property. The chain was lengthy and elements of the work became complex. Martin was tenacious and resolved to answer our queries as they arose. He handled all aspe

  • Henry, April 2025
    “We have purchased flats before with 2 different solicitors who were unable to help us this time. Martin came highly recommended and are we glad. He was very professional in every way: knowledgeable, approachable, he has a friendly manner, very

  • Megan Purcell-Jones, April 2025
    “Charlotte was extremely diligent and thorough. She talked us through the process of making our wills and listened to and understood our needs and the complexities involved. Extremely patient and very clear.”

  • Hena, April 2025
    “Great experience, Patrick was very clear and gave time to explain the legal processes. Friendly and professional communication made me feel comfortable asking questions, received great legal advice.”

  • Michael Constable, April 2025
    “I wanted to revise my will and appoint RIAA Barker Gillette as my Executor and Trustees. This was handled very efficiently and professionally. It helped that I had agreed a fixed fee in advance.” Review left for: Herman Cheung

Read more
Send this to a friend