Skip to main content

News story

October 31, 2019

Holiday pay ruling hit schools and colleges

A case heard by the Court of Appeal earlier this year will affect many in the education sector; holiday pay for workers, who only work part of the year and have no contractually set hours, should not be calculated on a pro-rata basis.

In the case of The Harper Trust v Brazel, the Court of Appeal has ruled that part-year workers on a permanent contract but with no set hours are entitled to have their statutory holiday pay calculated on the basis of their average earnings over the previous 12-week period before taking leave.

Many employers use a pro-rata calculation of annual pay to work out holiday pay for part-year workers without normal working hours. This ruling likely means that higher holiday pay payments are due to part-year workers with no set hours, and employers risk claims for unlawful deductions where pro-rata calculations have previously been made.

The case was brought by music teacher Lesley Brazel, who worked on a permanent employment contract during term time at a school but was paid only for the hours she worked. These varied from term to term, depending on how many children were taking music lessons. Under the terms of her contract, she was entitled to holiday leave of 5.6 weeks (in line with the statutory entitlement) and was required to take that holiday out of term time.

Under the Working Time Regulations 1998 (WTRs), annual leave should be calculated at the rate of a week’s pay for each week of leave.

For Ms Bezel, holiday pay was calculated by multiplying her pay for the hours she worked each term by 12.07 per cent, a commonly used set percentage to calculate holiday entitlement for those with irregular working hours and as set out in the ACAS guide to holidays and pay.

The Court of Appeal has said there is no reason to pro-rata entitlement in this way, as the WTRs state that holiday pay should be calculated in accordance with the “week’s pay provisions” of the Employment Rights Act 1996 (ERA).

Under the ERA’s provisions, where a worker does not have normal working hours, holiday pay should be taken to be the worker’s average weekly pay in the 12 weeks before leave starts (excluding any weeks in which no remuneration was payable).

Employment partner, Karen Cole, said:

“Holiday pay can be a real minefield for employers, but this ruling is clear on the treatment of part-year permanent contracts. Employers who engage workers on a permanent basis for part of the year, which may include zero-hour arrangements, should check their approach to holiday pay calculations to ensure they get it right going forwards.

Employers should also be aware that workers may bring a claim to recover underpayments for the previous two-year period presented as an unlawful deduction from wages claim. It is, therefore, vital they check records retrospectively.”

Contact Karen Cole today for information on holiday pay or other employment matters.

Note: This article is not legal advice; it provides information of general interest about current legal issues.

Stay in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter

Stay in touch

By completing your details and submitting this form you confirm you are happy for us to send you marketing communications and that you agree to our Website Privacy Policy and Legal Notice and to us using Mailchimp to process your data.


Sending

News/Insight

  • Employer warning as immigration raids hit record high 
    Employers are being urged to review their recruitment procedures after new figures revealed that immigration enforcement raids have reached record levels across the UK.


    Read more
  • Planning for the future: What to include in a UK shareholders’ agreement
    A well-drafted agreement sets clear ground rules for how the company is run, how decisions are made, and what happens when circumstances change.


    Read more
  • Understanding Court of Protection applications in England and Wales
    When someone can no longer make decisions for themselves and has not put a Lasting Power of Attorney in place, the Court of Protection can step in. This article explains what the Court of Protection does, when an application may be needed, and what t


    Read more
  • Warranties and indemnities: Key protections in share and asset sales
    An overview of warranties and indemnities in share and asset sales, explaining key differences, common protections, liability limits and risk allocation.


    Read more
  • The Employment Rights Act is a call to action for employers 
    A new year, a new employment framework: what employers need to know about the Employment Rights Act passed by parliament in December 2025.


    Read more

What they say...

  • Laura Kelly, February 2026
    Review of legal guidance received “I recently worked with Patrick Simpson on my settlement agreement. Patrick guided me through every stage with exceptional care and diligence. He kept the process moving efficiently, always updating me promptly

  • Prasanna Sooriakumaran, February 2026
    “Really good, especially at dealing with the company that tried to overplay their hand. I highly recommend.”

  • Sharla Munian, February 2026
    Outstanding Legal Support and a Brilliant Result “I cannot recommend RIAA Barker Gillette highly enough. My solicitor supported me throughout a very challenging property litigation matter, and thanks to her expertise, dedication, and strategic

  • Client, February 2026
    Very good service in disagreement with architect “RIAA assisted me in a conflict I had with my architect, who wanted to overcharge me. The end result was satisfactory, with invoices reasonable despite being slightly higher than expected!”

  • Sharla Munian, February 2026
    Outstanding Solicitor Who Delivered the Outcome I Hoped For “After a number of years navigating a complex financial settlement following my separation, my solicitor has been incredible from start to finish. Their professionalism, patience, and

Read more
Send this to a friend