Skip to main content

Insight article

December 12, 2016

How employers can say no, without saying a word

Employers juggling their workload need to ensure workers can take their rest breaks.

The warning comes after an employer was found to have failed to take the necessary steps to facilitate rest breaks despite the employee not having made any specific request.

The case was brought by an employee who was running a roadside traffic management system. He argued that he had been denied his legal entitlement to rest breaks under the Working Time Regulations 1998.

The job with Abellio London Ltd involved regulating bus services to match road traffic conditions. Mr Grange, the employee, had a working day of 8.5 hours, including a half-hour lunch break. When it proved difficult for him to take a break because of the nature of the job, his employer changed his working day to 8 hours. The idea was that he would work without a break but finish half an hour earlier.

All workers are entitled to a 20-minute rest break after six hours of working under the Working Time Regulations, and if the entitlement is breached, an employee can make a claim if the employer ‘has refused to permit him’ to exercise the right. The key question, which took Mr Grange’s case to appeal, was whether an employee could make such a claim when he had not actively requested the break and so had not received a direct refusal from the employer.

Although the Employment Tribunal first held that there had to be an actual refusal of a request, the Appeal Tribunal held that workers should be positively enabled to take breaks by the employer.

In making the decision, the Employment Appeal Tribunal highlighted that minimum rest periods are essential for protecting health and safety. It said there should be no distinction between entitlements and obligations.

Employment expert Karen Cole said:

“The important thing to take away from this is that employers should not wait for rest breaks to be requested, instead they must be proactive in making sure that working arrangements enable workers to take those breaks. Otherwise, where the arrangement of the working day makes it difficult or prevents workers from taking a break, this may be taken as a denial of a right.”

She added:

“It’s important to have a clear policy, and to make sure that everyone in the company knows and understands how to take their break. This is particularly relevant to employers in sectors where employees often work long shifts and it is difficult to stop and take a break, such as social care, where continuity of care is vital. But it is equally important that all employers take it into account at busy periods, such as the run up to the Christmas holiday, and make sure that workers can take the required rest breaks, even if they choose not to.”

For more information, call Karen Cole from our employment team.

Note: This is not legal advice; it provides information of general interest about current legal issues.

Stay in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter

Stay in touch

By completing your details and submitting this form you confirm you are happy for us to send you marketing communications and that you agree to our Website Privacy Policy and Legal Notice and to us using Mailchimp to process your data.


Sending

News/Insight

  • How should an employer respond to a ‘heat of the moment’ resignation?
    Employers should remember that a 'heat of the moment' resignation should be treated differently from those that come in the usual course of business. They are often verbal and unexpected and usually follow a workplace disagreement. To do otherwise ma


    Read more
  • An Introduction to Private Client Law
    Lasting Powers of Attorney


    Read more
  • Understanding financial provisions on divorce
    Divorce can be emotionally challenging, and navigating the financial aspects can add to the challenge.


    Read more
  • Digital divorce: the highs and lows
    According to figures from the Ministry of Justice, digital divorce applications rose by 20% in the year following the introduction of no-fault divorce (2022 to 2023).


    Read more
  • Agile AI Regulation: Moving with the times
    Artificial intelligence (AI) is becoming more prominent everywhere we look in our everyday lives. The critical questions for those trying to make AI safer with regulations are: how broad, how soon and how strict should they be?


    Read more

What they say...

  • Peter W, May 2024
    “Patrick Simpson provided first class support when I experienced redundancy. I couldn’t have asked for more. Demonstrating his superior knowledge and experience and explaining everything to me with crystal clarity. Efficient and timely with a

  • Mr Rose, April 2024
    “The firm acted for me in an employment matter where the issues were as much practical as legal. The advice given was thorough and clear, marrying black letter law to the practicalities. This helped me greatly in achieving a satisfactory outcom

  • Brian Higgins, April 2024
    “Patrick was excellent, responded quickly and gave concise, clear advice. He made the process very straightforward.” Employment

  • J. Cassell, April 2024
    “We were advised by Charlotte Barbaroussis. Her dealings were very professional. She was pleasant easy to deal with and very approachable. Her help during the process of setting up my wife’s and my will made the task a lot easier.”

  • David Delicata, April 2024
    “I dealt with Pippa Marshall for my divorce, who was recommended to me by a friend who worked with Pippa for his complicated divorce. She was very professional and very informative. Pippa took her time to go through every aspect, and I really f

Read more
Send this to a friend