Skip to main content

Insight article

December 5, 2016

Dismissing employees with under two years’ service

Risky business?

Generally, employees can only claim unfair dismissal against an employer if they have a minimum of two years’ service. In 2012, the qualifying period increased from one to two years. This presents employers with some level of flexibility in managing and dismissing staff with less than two years’ service.

Employers should be mindful of the start date for new employees and keep an eye out for any concerns. If dissatisfied, it is easier for employers to dismiss employees during the first two years of service (subject to some caveats below).

The minimum

It is sensible to meet with the employee to outline any concerns. Take notes during the meeting. Notes are important because they record what was discussed and are useful if issues arise further down the line. For instance, the employee may be given a short period to improve if the issue is performance-related. If the employer remains unhappy, there is the option to dismiss quickly and efficiently.

It is important to check whether any company policies and procedures are contractually binding. If so, the employer must ensure capability and disciplinary procedures are followed. Ideally, a company’s policies and procedures should not form part of an employment contract since this enables change without consultation.

Exceptions

Employers must exercise caution when contemplating a dismissal. No qualifying length of service is required for a dismissal which is deemed automatically unfair. Examples include dismissal for pregnancy-related reasons, discrimination or acting as a trade union representative. The full list is set out in the Employment Rights Act 1996.

Note an employee whose termination date is the day before the second anniversary of their start date will have two years of service and qualify for an unfair dismissal claim.

Irrespective of unfair dismissal claims, employees can claim wrongful dismissal for breach of contract if the employer does not provide the relevant notice period or makes a payment in lieu of notice. In such cases, fairness is not an issue. The sole question is whether the contract has been breached. Employees are also entitled to be paid for any untaken accrued holiday at the termination date.

Best practice

Employers should follow the ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedure. If the employer has unreasonably failed to follow the code, they risk facing a 25% uplift on any compensation. Therefore, a dismissal without notice may be met with an unlawful deduction from wages claim or breach of contract, along with an uplift. A capability termination may be met with a discrimination claim with the risk of an uplift. Employers following the Code add robustness to any claim on an evidential basis.

If you need advice on dismissing an employee, regardless of their length of service, or if you have been dismissed and want advice on your rights, call Karen Cole today.

Note: This article is not legal advice; it provides information of general interest about current legal issues.

Stay in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter

Stay in touch

By completing your details and submitting this form you confirm you are happy for us to send you marketing communications and that you agree to our Website Privacy Policy and Legal Notice and to us using Mailchimp to process your data.


Sending

News/Insight

  • How should an employer respond to a ‘heat of the moment’ resignation?
    Employers should remember that a 'heat of the moment' resignation should be treated differently from those that come in the usual course of business. They are often verbal and unexpected and usually follow a workplace disagreement. To do otherwise ma


    Read more
  • An Introduction to Private Client Law
    Lasting Powers of Attorney


    Read more
  • Understanding financial provisions on divorce
    Divorce can be emotionally challenging, and navigating the financial aspects can add to the challenge.


    Read more
  • Digital divorce: the highs and lows
    According to figures from the Ministry of Justice, digital divorce applications rose by 20% in the year following the introduction of no-fault divorce (2022 to 2023).


    Read more
  • Agile AI Regulation: Moving with the times
    Artificial intelligence (AI) is becoming more prominent everywhere we look in our everyday lives. The critical questions for those trying to make AI safer with regulations are: how broad, how soon and how strict should they be?


    Read more

What they say...

  • Peter W, May 2024
    “Patrick Simpson provided first class support when I experienced redundancy. I couldn’t have asked for more. Demonstrating his superior knowledge and experience and explaining everything to me with crystal clarity. Efficient and timely with a

  • Mr Rose, April 2024
    “The firm acted for me in an employment matter where the issues were as much practical as legal. The advice given was thorough and clear, marrying black letter law to the practicalities. This helped me greatly in achieving a satisfactory outcom

  • Brian Higgins, April 2024
    “Patrick was excellent, responded quickly and gave concise, clear advice. He made the process very straightforward.” Employment

  • J. Cassell, April 2024
    “We were advised by Charlotte Barbaroussis. Her dealings were very professional. She was pleasant easy to deal with and very approachable. Her help during the process of setting up my wife’s and my will made the task a lot easier.”

  • David Delicata, April 2024
    “I dealt with Pippa Marshall for my divorce, who was recommended to me by a friend who worked with Pippa for his complicated divorce. She was very professional and very informative. Pippa took her time to go through every aspect, and I really f

Read more
Send this to a friend