Skip to main content

Insight article

December 1, 2023

Director responsibilities on resignation – do you know yours?

When Rishi Sunak removed Suella Braverman from her cabinet post, she took a defiant stance, with an open letter criticising the PM for reneging on promises and calling for a leadership election.

Picture of a mail black company director wearing a blue suit, white shirt, light tie and glasses.

It was a defiant, headline-grabbing move that may inspire other discontents looking to speak out against their bosses. But the path for a dissatisfied cabinet minister may not translate into the corporate world so easily.

While resignation may mean general duties no longer bind a company director, their corporate responsibility can continue long after stepping down from the board. 

Under the Insolvency Act 1986, if a director has allowed a company to continue trading when there is no reasonable prospect of avoiding insolvency, they could be personally liable, even after resigning. 

Similarly, a director who has acted negligently, fraudulently, or in breach of their duties during their time may be held personally liable for any losses later incurred by the company.  

Neither will resignation be any protection if a conflict of interest arises through the use of any property, information or opportunity gained during a time as director. And if a director has made personal guarantees to secure company loans or debts. In that case, these remain binding, regardless of whether they have resigned. 

Importantly, directors looking to resign must ensure that the company’s finances and other corporate responsibilities are well managed to minimise any risk of personal liability later on. Compliance with the Companies Act 2006 requires directors to exercise reasonable care.

Partner and head of our company and commercial team, Victoria Holland, said:

“Even where a director leaves the business in a position of financial stability, if the company were later to become insolvent, then any director who served during the three years running up to the insolvency could be subject to investigation.

“The impact of this could be far-reaching. For example, where a director has played a role in the company’s difficulties in those three years, they could be disqualified from being a director for up to fifteen years, which could prevent them from continuing in any subsequent role as a director.” 

Partner and head of our employment team, Karen Cole, added:

“For an MP, the resignation or dismissal may be very high profile, but it’s effectively a clean break. For a director, it’s important to be sure that any resignation takes account of the whole picture and they ensure that financial management and other corporate responsibilities are all in good order before they sign the exit paperwork, if they want to minimise any future risk of personal liability.”

For employment advice and corporate queries, contact Karen Cole or Victoria Holland today.

Note: This article is not legal advice; it provides information of general interest about current legal issues.

Stay in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter

Stay in touch

By completing your details and submitting this form you confirm you are happy for us to send you marketing communications and that you agree to our Website Privacy Policy and Legal Notice and to us using Mailchimp to process your data.


Sending

News/Insight

  • Buying a commercial unit: what you need to know
    Buying a commercial unit can be a valuable step for your business, but it comes with legal, tax, planning and property risks. Brinda Granthrai explains what buyers should consider before committing.


    Read more
  • Pension and inheritance tax changes from April 2027: why now is the time to review your will and estate plan
    From 6 April 2027, most unused pension funds and pension death benefits are expected to be included in a person’s estate for inheritance tax purposes. This article explains what the changes could mean for families, pension nominations, wills, chari


    Read more
  • What happens when company owners disagree? The key to keeping private companies running smoothly
    Director and shareholder disagreements can quickly disrupt a business if they are not addressed early. This article explains what disputes can mean for a private company, how they can be avoided, and how legal advice can help protect stability and su


    Read more
  • SMEs urged to review risks as liability rules expand
    New criminal liability rules taking effect on 29 June 2026 will make it easier to prosecute businesses of any size where senior managers commit offences while acting on the organisation’s behalf.


    Read more
  • AI-written grievances add new pressure for employers
    AI is making it easier for employees to produce detailed, formal-looking grievances that refer to legal concepts and workplace rights. For employers, the key is to look beyond the language, identify the core concern and follow a fair, consistent grie


    Read more

What they say...

  • Client, July 2026
    Pragmatic, but commercially astute support “Genuinely, we valued your pragmatic, but commercially astute support. It has helped us get this tricky deal over the line in a manner that we both feel supports our needs in a balanced way and gives L

  • Chey, July 2026
    Professional and speedy “I’m extremely happy with the service provided by RIAA Barker Gillette. They were very professional, dealt with my matter at speed and were very accommodating with my disability. I wouldn’t hesitate to use th

  • Client, June 2026
    Thank you “I had a call with Pippa that was not only factual and to the point but also reassuring and very helpful. Would highly recommend.”

  • Client, June 2026
    Trusts services “Very helpful service which solved our problem.”

  • Client, June 2026
    Probate Services “We used Patrice Lawrence to deal with our parents’ probate, and she handled the case promptly, professionally and with the respect due for a matter of this nature.”

Read more
Send this to a friend