Skip to main content

Insight article

December 1, 2023

Director responsibilities on resignation – do you know yours?

When Rishi Sunak removed Suella Braverman from her cabinet post, she took a defiant stance, with an open letter criticising the PM for reneging on promises and calling for a leadership election.

Picture of a mail black company director wearing a blue suit, white shirt, light tie and glasses.

It was a defiant, headline-grabbing move that may inspire other discontents looking to speak out against their bosses. But the path for a dissatisfied cabinet minister may not translate into the corporate world so easily.

While resignation may mean general duties no longer bind a company director, their corporate responsibility can continue long after stepping down from the board. 

Under the Insolvency Act 1986, if a director has allowed a company to continue trading when there is no reasonable prospect of avoiding insolvency, they could be personally liable, even after resigning. 

Similarly, a director who has acted negligently, fraudulently, or in breach of their duties during their time may be held personally liable for any losses later incurred by the company.  

Neither will resignation be any protection if a conflict of interest arises through the use of any property, information or opportunity gained during a time as director. And if a director has made personal guarantees to secure company loans or debts. In that case, these remain binding, regardless of whether they have resigned. 

Importantly, directors looking to resign must ensure that the company’s finances and other corporate responsibilities are well managed to minimise any risk of personal liability later on. Compliance with the Companies Act 2006 requires directors to exercise reasonable care.

Partner and head of our company and commercial team, Victoria Holland, said:

“Even where a director leaves the business in a position of financial stability, if the company were later to become insolvent, then any director who served during the three years running up to the insolvency could be subject to investigation.

“The impact of this could be far-reaching. For example, where a director has played a role in the company’s difficulties in those three years, they could be disqualified from being a director for up to fifteen years, which could prevent them from continuing in any subsequent role as a director.” 

Partner and head of our employment team, Karen Cole, added:

“For an MP, the resignation or dismissal may be very high profile, but it’s effectively a clean break. For a director, it’s important to be sure that any resignation takes account of the whole picture and they ensure that financial management and other corporate responsibilities are all in good order before they sign the exit paperwork, if they want to minimise any future risk of personal liability.”

For employment advice and corporate queries, contact Karen Cole or Victoria Holland today.

Note: This article is not legal advice; it provides information of general interest about current legal issues.

Stay in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter

Stay in touch

By completing your details and submitting this form you confirm you are happy for us to send you marketing communications and that you agree to our Website Privacy Policy and Legal Notice and to us using Mailchimp to process your data.


Sending

News/Insight

  • The Employment Rights Act is a call to action for employers 
    A new year, a new employment framework: what employers need to know about the Employment Rights Act passed by parliament in December 2025.


    Read more
  • Dilapidations explained: What commercial tenants and landlords need to know
    Dilapidations are a common source of dispute at the end of a commercial lease. They can involve significant sums of money and often come as an unwelcome surprise to tenants who believed they had left a property in reasonable condition. Understanding


    Read more
  • The role of due diligence in corporate transactions
    In corporate transactions, due diligence is a key stage that usually follows agreement of Heads of Terms, allowing the Buyer to investigate the target company or its assets before committing to the deal.


    Read more
  • Love in later life and the inheritance tax trap
    Increasingly, lawyers are seeing couples who have chosen to live together rather than marry, sometimes for many years, without fully appreciating how differently the law treats them, particularly when it comes to inheritance tax and financial protect


    Read more
  • Understanding Heads of Terms in corporate transactions
    Heads of terms are a crucial first step in corporate transactions. Learn what they include, why they matter, and how they shape successful deals.


    Read more

What they say...

  • Amish Bristol, January 2026
    Absolutely brilliant, fast, professional, clear and delivered a robust service “Recent mortgage oversight from Ben Marks and Anne was superbly dealt with, and I intend on moving all my business to them. For a big firm, they really do pay attent

  • Client, January 2026
    Excellent experience “The process of my work was quick and effective.”

  • Vicky, January 2026
    Clear, friendly, helpful “Very efficient and helpful with arrangements for my will.”

  • R Cook, December 2025
    Settlement Sorted “Grayson Stuckey was great. Efficient and friendly with all aspects of the support provided. We worked well together and achieved a positive outcome. Recommended.”

  • Ivan Naisbitt, December 2025
    More than just a service “Michael Davies has been representing me for about 35 years, and I cannot recommend him or RIAA Barker Gillette (UK) highly enough. Aside from the normal conveyancing, he is always on hand to advise and guide you throug

Read more
Send this to a friend