Skip to main content

Insight article

January 14, 2015

Business lease applications

Ensuring both joint tenants apply for a business lease renewal to avoid losing security of tenure

In Lie v Mohile, the Court of Appeal held that an application for a new business tenancy made by one of two business partners was not valid.

This upholds the established case law of Jacobs v Chaudhuri in that all joint tenants must join in an application under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 unless the tenants can take advantage of one of the statutory exceptions.

Section 41A provides an exception for partnerships where not all of the joint tenants continue to use the demised premises for the purposes of the partnership business, namely:

  • The lease must be vested in at least two joint tenants;
  • The demise must include property occupied for the purposes of the business;
  • The business must, at some time during the tenancy, have been carried on in partnership by all of the joint tenants;
  • at least one of the joint tenants must currently carry out the business, either alone or in partnership with others and occupy no part of the property, under the tenancy, for the purposes of the business carried on by the other joint tenants or tenants;
  • It is very important, not only when a protected lease is ending but at the start of a business, that the legal structure is considered in view of any application. Doctors and dentists, in particular, often practice from shared premises, and there may be circumstances where vesting property interests in a special purpose vehicle (SPV), such as a limited company or limited liability partnership, may help avoid disputes in the future. It is sensible to take legal advice on a corporate and property level and to consider any tax implications.

Speak to property litigator Laura St-Gallay today about your business lease application.

Note: This article is not legal advice; it provides information of general interest about current legal issues.

Stay in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter

Stay in touch

By completing your details and submitting this form you confirm you are happy for us to send you marketing communications and that you agree to our Website Privacy Policy and Legal Notice and to us using Mailchimp to process your data.


Sending

News/Insight

  • Double jeopardy of digital asset inheritance planning amid probate delays
    Hidden digital assets and mounting interest on inheritance tax bills are creating a costly double risk for families dealing with estates following the death of a loved one, as probate delays continue to impact thousands across England and Wales, addi


    Read more
  • Deal or no deal? Keeping negotiations on track
    How to keep commercial deals on track with Heads of Terms, NDAs and exclusivity, improving efficiency, reducing risk and avoiding delays.


    Read more
  • Rights and wrongs: How AI is reshaping Employment Tribunal claims
    AI may be a familiar presence in the workplace, but it’s now starting to appear somewhere less expected: the Employment Tribunal (ET). Grayson Stuckey explores this trend – and what it means for employers.


    Read more
  • Renters’ Rights Act: why process and paperwork matter more than ever for landlords
    The Renters’ Rights Act has now passed into law, marking one of the most significant shifts in the private rented sector in a generation. Most of the new measures will take effect in May 2026, with a national landlord database to follow later in th


    Read more
  • Understanding the Roles of Executors and Trustees
    When making a will, you place significant trust in those appointed to carry out your wishes. Executors and trustees are key roles, often held by the same people, but their responsibilities differ. Understanding these roles and their obligations helps


    Read more

What they say...

  • W Sandover, April 2026
    Boundary Wall dispute “Although (for complex, not relevant) reasons, this matter never reached the point of either negotiations or a court case, Barker Gillette staff provided us with excellent support. I would certainly go back to them in the

  • Client, April 2026
    Excellent suppy “Karen Cole supported me through a difficult time with warmth and professionalism. She made the entire process as smooth as possible, responding quickly to communication and giving clear advice. I would highly recommend Karen to

  • Client, April 2026
    So helpful! “Pippa Marshall listened and offered supportive, practical advice. She was very friendly, easy to talk to and did not pressure me to make any costly decisions during my free 30-minute consultation. I would definitely recommend Pippa

  • Nika Franke-Matthecka, April 2026
    “We had an excellent experience working with Michael Davies and his team on the sale of our property. They were efficient, knowledgeable, and highly diligent throughout the entire process. Communication was always prompt and clear, which made w

  • Paul Woodman, March 2026
    Will writing “Excellent service from start to finish. Efficient and good value. Charlotte was very professional, knowledgeable and understanding.”

Read more
Send this to a friend