Skip to main content

Insight article

January 13, 2015

A notice to quit served by one joint tenant can determine the tenancy

The Supreme Court has ruled that a notice to quit served by one joint tenant determines the tenancy and does not infringe European Human Rights.

The Supreme Court has ruled that a notice to quit served by one joint tenant determines the tenancy and does not infringe on European Human Rights.

In the case of Sims v Dacorum Borough Council, the Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal against an earlier Court of Appeal decision. The Court held that the existing law allowed a joint secure tenant to end a tenancy unilaterally and would not interfere with the co-tenant’s rights under Article 8 (the right to respect home and family life) and Article 1 (the right to peaceful enjoyment of possessions). Had the Supreme Court ruled the other way, a situation could have arisen whereby a tenant, having served a notice to quit, had to remain a tenant against their will, leading to other human rights questions.

Whilst this is a welcome relief to many housing authorities and private landlords, the specific wording in the tenancy agreement provided for determination by a single joint tenant, so it is advisable to check the wording of a tenancy agreement carefully where there are joint tenancies.

For more information, speak to property litigator Laura St-Gallay.

Note: This article is not legal advice; it provides information of general interest about current legal issues.

Stay in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter

Stay in touch

By completing your details and submitting this form you confirm you are happy for us to send you marketing communications and that you agree to our Website Privacy Policy and Legal Notice and to us using Mailchimp to process your data.


Sending

News/Insight

  • A spotlight on child arrangements in the UK
    Celebrating National Children’s Day.


    Read more
  • How should an employer respond to a ‘heat of the moment’ resignation?
    Employers should remember that a 'heat of the moment' resignation should be treated differently from those that come in the usual course of business. They are often verbal and unexpected and usually follow a workplace disagreement. To do otherwise ma


    Read more
  • An Introduction to Private Client Law
    Lasting Powers of Attorney


    Read more
  • Understanding financial provisions on divorce
    Divorce can be emotionally challenging, and navigating the financial aspects can add to the challenge.


    Read more
  • Digital divorce: the highs and lows
    According to figures from the Ministry of Justice, digital divorce applications rose by 20% in the year following the introduction of no-fault divorce (2022 to 2023).


    Read more

What they say...

  • A. J, May 2024
    “Herman was very helpful and compassionate when dealing with my will. He explained everything to me and made sure I was comfortable with the detail before preparing the final version. Excellent service.” Wills, tax and trusts

  • Deborah Mendel-Lion, May 2024
    “My house sale was dealt with extremely efficiently and professionally [by Martin Alfreds] with the minimum of stress. All correspondence was handled by return and I was informed of the progression of the sale promptly.” Residential sales

  • Peter W, May 2024
    “Patrick Simpson provided first class support when I experienced redundancy. I couldn’t have asked for more. Demonstrating his superior knowledge and experience and explaining everything to me with crystal clarity. Efficient and timely with a

  • Mr Rose, April 2024
    “The firm acted for me in an employment matter where the issues were as much practical as legal. The advice given was thorough and clear, marrying black letter law to the practicalities. This helped me greatly in achieving a satisfactory outcom

  • Brian Higgins, April 2024
    “Patrick was excellent, responded quickly and gave concise, clear advice. He made the process very straightforward.” Employment

Read more
Send this to a friend