Skip to main content

News story

December 13, 2018

Brexit and employment law

Whichever side of the Brexit fence you sit on, there is no doubt that Brexit has the potential for far reaching implications for the UK.

Some have advocated that the UK’s involvement in the EU was always a bad marriage, and it could prove to be that Brexit is a bad marriage ending in divorce. Like most divorces, this one could be messy, painful, expensive, and worse still, it’s likely to take years to complete. Time will only tell if this is correct.

Looking specifically at the effect that Brexit will have on employment law, although much of UK employment law is derived from EU law, the UK’s withdrawal from the EU is unlikely to have an immediate impact. When the UK leaves the EU, the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018 will repeal the European Communities Act 1972, and existing EU law will be converted into domestic law.

Most EU Directives are already implemented in the UK by regulations or Acts of Parliament; for example, the EU Working Time Directives are implemented by the Working Time Regulations 1998. It will be for Parliament to decide whether to retain, amend or repeal domestic legislation, and the theory is that they can do this without EU input after EU membership.

Most of the impact of Brexit will be speculative. Commentators have identified the harmonisation of contracts after a TUPE transfer; the calculation of holiday pay; agency workers’ rights; and the introduction of a cap on compensation in discrimination claims as examples of areas currently governed by EU law, where changes could be made in the future by a Government looking to roll back employment regulation.

It is possible that the UK will be required to continue to implement elements of EU legislation as a condition of a negotiated trade deal between the UK and EU.

Many areas of domestic law that are derived from EU law have been heavily influenced by decisions of the European Court of Justice (ECJ), for example, working time, TUPE and discrimination law. Under the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018, UK courts will not be bound by decisions of the ECJ made on or after the exit date. However, ECJ decisions made before that date will continue to bind UK courts in the interpretation of relevant laws and will have the same precedent status as decisions of the Supreme Court.

If there is no negotiated Brexit deal, the Government has identified two areas that will be affected:

  1. employees who work in some EU countries, employed by a UK employer, may not be protected on the insolvency of the employer; and
  2. regulations will be amended so that it will not be possible to make a new request to set up a European Works Council or information and consultation procedure.

Such things are unlikely to be pivotal, and it is therefore hoped that the impact of a no-deal Brexit will not impact employment law to much of an extent.

Speak to employment solicitor Karen Cole to find out more.

Note: This article is not legal advice; it provides information of general interest about current legal issues.

Stay in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter

Stay in touch

By completing your details and submitting this form you confirm you are happy for us to send you marketing communications and that you agree to our Website Privacy Policy and Legal Notice and to us using Mailchimp to process your data.


Sending

News/Insight

  • The Employment Rights Act is a call to action for employers 
    A new year, a new employment framework: what employers need to know about the Employment Rights Act passed by parliament in December 2025.


    Read more
  • Dilapidations explained: What commercial tenants and landlords need to know
    Dilapidations are a common source of dispute at the end of a commercial lease. They can involve significant sums of money and often come as an unwelcome surprise to tenants who believed they had left a property in reasonable condition. Understanding


    Read more
  • The role of due diligence in corporate transactions
    In corporate transactions, due diligence is a key stage that usually follows agreement of Heads of Terms, allowing the Buyer to investigate the target company or its assets before committing to the deal.


    Read more
  • Love in later life and the inheritance tax trap
    Increasingly, lawyers are seeing couples who have chosen to live together rather than marry, sometimes for many years, without fully appreciating how differently the law treats them, particularly when it comes to inheritance tax and financial protect


    Read more
  • Understanding Heads of Terms in corporate transactions
    Heads of terms are a crucial first step in corporate transactions. Learn what they include, why they matter, and how they shape successful deals.


    Read more

What they say...

  • Amish Bristol, January 2026
    Absolutely brilliant, fast, professional, clear and delivered a robust service “Recent mortgage oversight from Ben Marks and Anne was superbly dealt with, and I intend on moving all my business to them. For a big firm, they really do pay attent

  • Client, January 2026
    Excellent experience “The process of my work was quick and effective.”

  • Vicky, January 2026
    Clear, friendly, helpful “Very efficient and helpful with arrangements for my will.”

  • R Cook, December 2025
    Settlement Sorted “Grayson Stuckey was great. Efficient and friendly with all aspects of the support provided. We worked well together and achieved a positive outcome. Recommended.”

  • Ivan Naisbitt, December 2025
    More than just a service “Michael Davies has been representing me for about 35 years, and I cannot recommend him or RIAA Barker Gillette (UK) highly enough. Aside from the normal conveyancing, he is always on hand to advise and guide you throug

Read more
Send this to a friend