Skip to main content

Insight article

December 13, 2018

Millennials moving away from marriage

There has been a spate of recent media articles highlighting the numbers of young people in their 20s and 30s staying away from marriage, either entirely or until later life.

As to the likely cause of this shift in Millennials behaviour, there have been many theories put forward:

  1. The high costs of the wedding day, when balanced against the pressures of the private rental market and the drive to make that first step onto the property ladder.
  2. The fear of social stigma attached to divorce. A recent BBC News article interviewed several under 30 divorcees to gather their views. The majority have regretted marrying young and now warn their friends and family against following the same path.
  3. The perception that marriage is an archaic institution developed with patriarchal views. In a political and social climate which strives for gender equality, many young adults do not believe marriage is an avenue that supports those ambitions.

Our Family law specialist, Pippa Marshall, has another viewpoint to consider…

“An increasing percentage of Millennials are becoming more aware of their legal rights and feel that they don’t perhaps need the ‘safety net’ of marriage to protect their assets or defend financial claims should a separation occur.”

Unfortunately, this “awareness” is coming from a plethora of resources of varying accuracy. The phrase “common law marriage” is too often quoted as gospel and thus significantly misconstrued. Even national insurance companies, on their quotation forms, offer a relationship definition of “Common Law Partnered”. Put simply, there is no such legal principle as a common law wife or husband. Unmarried persons, with or without children, are protected financially by the law but not to the extent in which married persons are.

Pippa further explains;

“Married couples, when resolving their financial circumstance, rely upon one area of law and this encompasses their claims in respect of all their financial assets. Conversely, for unmarried couples these claims are protected but treated differently by being split into several strands. For example, an unmarried couple with a joint property, joint business endeavour and two children would rely upon potentially three different areas of law to resolve their claims in the event of disputes. The thresholds to pursue a successful claim vary greatly from those prescribed for disputing married couples.”

Evidently, in Pippa’s view, the phrase “common law marriage” should, in fact, be the “common law myth”. However, unmarried millennials can rest assured that a range of laws protect their financial assets should their relationship end. It is imperative that these couples understand the different strands of our legal system so that they can make informed decisions and take prompt steps, practically and/or legally, to resolve any disputes which arise.

While fewer people are marrying young, a growing number of couples marry later in life. By this time, they may have developed assets or have children from a previous relationship. We will speak with Pippa again in the New Year, looking at the proactive steps couples should take before mid-life marriage and the merits of a Pre-Nuptial Agreement.

Speak to family solicitor Pippa Marshall today.

Note: This article is not legal advice; it provides information of general interest about current legal issues.

Stay in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter

Stay in touch

By completing your details and submitting this form you confirm you are happy for us to send you marketing communications and that you agree to our Website Privacy Policy and Legal Notice and to us using Mailchimp to process your data.


Sending

News/Insight

  • Can you make a WhatsApp will?
    Key legal requirements and future outlook.


    Read more
  • Supporting neurodiverse people in family law matters
    Understanding neurodiversity in the legal context.


    Read more
  • Supreme court ruling on referees’ employment status
    In PGMOL v HMRC, the Supreme Court considered whether professional referees were self-employed. The case has the potential for far-reaching implications across the employment world.


    Read more
  • Business First Magazine
    Read our expert insights on key workplace and corporate issues.


    Read more
  • Why is clear contract drafting important?
    How simple contract clauses can protect your business.


    Read more

What they say...

  • Ian, April 2025
    “Martin and his team at Barker Gillette acted for us in our purchase and sale of property. The chain was lengthy and elements of the work became complex. Martin was tenacious and resolved to answer our queries as they arose. He handled all aspe

  • Henry, April 2025
    “We have purchased flats before with 2 different solicitors who were unable to help us this time. Martin came highly recommended and are we glad. He was very professional in every way: knowledgeable, approachable, he has a friendly manner, very

  • Megan Purcell-Jones, April 2025
    “Charlotte was extremely diligent and thorough. She talked us through the process of making our wills and listened to and understood our needs and the complexities involved. Extremely patient and very clear.”

  • Hena, April 2025
    “Great experience, Patrick was very clear and gave time to explain the legal processes. Friendly and professional communication made me feel comfortable asking questions, received great legal advice.”

  • Michael Constable, April 2025
    “I wanted to revise my will and appoint RIAA Barker Gillette as my Executor and Trustees. This was handled very efficiently and professionally. It helped that I had agreed a fixed fee in advance.” Review left for: Herman Cheung

Read more
Send this to a friend